Brief, Noninjurious Electric Waveform for Stimulation of the Brain
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A traditional safety restriction placed on a stimulus' waveform to prevent electro-chemical damage is a biphasic, asymmetric, charge-balanced waveform, first introduced by Lilly et al.
“A traditional safety restriction placed on a stimulus’ waveform in order to prevent electro-chemical damage is a biphasic, asymmetric, charge-balanced waveform, first introduced by Lilly et al. [85], and commonly referred to as the 'Lilly pulse'.”
From Safety of long-term electrical peripheral nerve stimulation: review of the state of the art (2019) · cites this paper as [85]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 287
- Authors
- Lilly, J. C., Hughes, J. R., Alvord, E. C., & Galkin, T. W.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- ORCID
- Hughes, John R.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1955-04
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 3144
- Pages
- 468-469
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2045284934
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- brain stimulation, electrical brain stimulation, neurostimulation
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Electricity, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
