The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproducible Research in Computational Science
Open accessAbstract
Computational science has led to exciting new developments, but the nature of the work has exposed limitations in our ability to evaluate published findings. Reproducibility has the potential to serve as a minimum standard for judging scientific claims when full independent replication of a study is not possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The difficulty in auditing spreadsheets makes them generally incompatible with the principles of computational reproducibility [5].”
From Gene name errors: Lessons not learned (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The rough consensus reduces to three ingredients.”
From Designing reproducible large-language-model-assisted scientific analyses (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“We develop a two-step attribution process which combines a transparent and reproducible 39,40 machine learning approach to identifying studies on observed climate impacts with model-based assessments of detectable anthropogenic contributions to historical temperature and precipitation trends.”
From Machine-learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Allison, D. B., Ball, C. A., Coulibaly, I., Cui, X., Culhane, A. C., Falchi, M., Furlanello, C., Game, L., Jurman, G., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.295 · Cited by 551
King, G. (1995) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096500057607 · Cited by 473
Publish your computer code: it is good enough
Barnes, N. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/467753a · Cited by 317
Accessible Reproducible Research
Mesirov, J. P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1179653 · Cited by 311
Reproducible Epidemiologic Research
Peng, R. D., Dominici, F., & Zeger, S. L. (2006) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwj093 · Cited by 292
Self-citationReproducible research and Biostatistics
Peng, R. D. (2009) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxp014 · Cited by 245
Self-citationMaking scientific computations reproducible
Schwab, M., Karrenbach, N., & Claerbout, J. F. (2000) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/5992.881708 · Cited by 232
Reproducible Research: Moving toward Research the Public Can Really Trust
Laine, C., Goodman, S. N., Griswold, M. E., & Sox, H. C. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-6-200703200-00154 · Cited by 213
Making Data Maximally Available
Hanson, B., Sugden, A. M., & Alberts, B. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1203354 · Cited by 172
King, G. (1995) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.2307/420301 · Cited by 145
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Yale Law School Roundtable on Data and Code Sharing, Comput. Sci. Eng. 12, 8 (2010).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,003
Repeatability of the searching process in reviews of restoration outcomes
Romanelli, J. P., Silva, L. G. M., Gonçalves, M. C. P., Naves, R. P., de Almeida, D. R. A., de Resende, A. F., & Rodrigues, R. R. (2021) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.13496 · Cited by 10
Nine quick tips for open meta-analyses
Moreau, D., & Wiebels, K. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012252 · Cited by 11
White, J. W., Boote, K., Kimball, B. A., Porter, C., Salmerón, M., Shelia, V., Thorp, K., & Hoogenboom, G. (2025) · npj Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1038/s44264-025-00067-z · Cited by 8
Penerapan Reproducible Research pada RStudio dengan Bahasa R dan Paket Knitr
Budiaji, W. (2019) · Khazanah Informatika Jurnal Ilmu Komputer dan Informatika · doi:10.23917/khif.v5i1.7202 · Cited by 10
Executable Simulation Model of the Liver
König, M. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801238-3.11682-4 · Cited by 9
Reproducible Large-Scale Neuroimaging Studies with the OpenMOLE Workflow Management System
Passerat‐Palmbach, J., Reuillon, R., Leclaire, M., Makropoulos, A., Robinson, E. C., Parisot, S., & Rueckert, D. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2017.00021 · Cited by 10
Returns to scale in electricity generation: Replicated and revisited
Bernstein, D. H., & Parmeter, C. F. (2017) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.12.024 · Cited by 10
Beyond lexical frequencies: using R for text analysis in the digital humanities
Arnold, T., Ballier, N., Lissón, P., & Tilton, L. (2019) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-019-09456-6 · Cited by 14
Finak, G., Mayer, B. T., Fulp, W. J., Obrecht, P., Sato, A., Chung, E., Holman, D., & Gottardo, R. (2018) · Gates Open Research · doi:10.12688/gatesopenres.12832.1 · Cited by 10
Can You Repeat That? Exploring the Definition of a Successful Model Replication in Health Economics
McManus, E., Turner, D., & Sach, T. (2019) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-019-00836-y · Cited by 10
Separate authorship categories to recognize data collectors and code developers
Ewers, R. M., Barlow, J., Banks-Leite, C., & Rahbek, C. (2019) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-019-1033-9 · Cited by 10
Toward Training and Assessing Reproducible Data Analysis in Data Science Education
Yu, B., & Hu, X. (2019) · Data Intelligence · doi:10.1162/dint_a_00053 · Cited by 10
The Potential of Notebooks for Scientific Publication, Reproducibility and Dissemination
Rowe, F., Maier, G., Arribas‐Bel, D., & Rey, S. J. (2020) · REGION · doi:10.18335/region.v7i3.357 · Cited by 10
European Heart Journal quality standards
Alfonso, F., Torp-Pedersen, C. T., Carter, R. E., & Crea, F. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab324 · Cited by 10
Toward Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR) Photovoltaic System Time Series Data
Nihar, A., Curran, A. J., Karimi, A. M., Braid, J. L., Bruckman, L. S., Koyutürk, M., Wu, Y., & French, R. H. (2021) · Conference record of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference · doi:10.1109/pvsc43889.2021.9518782 · Cited by 11
pvsR: An Open Source Interface to Big Data on the American Political Sphere
Matter, U., & Stutzer, A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130501 · Cited by 12
Promises and Pitfalls of High-Throughput Biological Assays
Finak, G., & Gottardo, R. (2016) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3572-7_12 · Cited by 10
Lyon, L., Mattern, E., Jeng, W., & He, D. (2016) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.2016.14505301114 · Cited by 10
Mondelli, M. L., Peterson, A. T., & Gadelha, L. M. R., Jr. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34146-6_3 · Cited by 11
File-based localization of numerical perturbations in data analysis pipelines
Salari, A., Kiar, G., Lewis, L. B., Evans, A. C., & Glatard, T. (2020) · GigaScience · doi:10.1093/gigascience/giaa106 · Cited by 10
Enabling End-To-End Machine Learning Replicability: A Case Study in Educational Data MiningPreprint
Gardner, J., Yang, Y., Baker, R. S., & Brooks, C. A. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.05208 · Cited by 10
Tagungsband ASIM 2018 – 24. Symposium Simulationstechnik
Sundermeier, J., Gehlhoff, F., & Fay, A. (2018) · doi:10.11128/arep.56 · Cited by 10
VizNet: Towards A Large-Scale Visualization Learning and Benchmarking RepositoryPreprint
Hu, K., Gaikwad, N., Bakker, M. A., Hulsebos, M., Zgraggen, E., Hidalgo, C. A., Kraska, T., Li, G., Satyanarayan, A., & Demiralp, Ç. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.04616 · Cited by 15
Data-science ready, multisite, human diffusion MRI white-matter-tract statistics
Lerma‐Usabiaga, G., Mukherjee, P., Perry, L. M., & Wandell, B. A. (2020) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-020-00760-3 · Cited by 9
Machine learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studiesPreprint
Callaghan, M., Schleussner, C., Nath, S., Lejeune, Q., Knutson, T. R., Reichstein, M., Hansen, G., Theokritoff, E., Andrijevic, M., Brecha, R. J., et al. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-783398/v2 · Cited by 16
AutonoML: Towards an Integrated Framework for Autonomous Machine Learning
Kedziora, D. J., Musiał, K., & Gabryś, B. (2024) · Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning · doi:10.1561/2200000093 · Cited by 34
A how-to guide for code sharing in biology
Abdill, R. J., Talarico, E., & Grieneisen, L. (2024) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002815 · Cited by 13
Characterising reproducibility debt in scientific software: A systematic literature review
Hassan, Z., Treude, C., Norrish, M., Williams, G., & Potanin, A. (2024) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2024.112327 · Cited by 12
Code-sharing policies are associated with increased reproducibility potential of ecological findings
Sánchez‐Tójar, A., Bezine, A., Purgar, M., & Čulina, A. (2025) · Peer Community Journal · doi:10.24072/pcjournal.541 · Cited by 11
Tier-based standards for FAIR sequence data and metadata sharing in microbiome research
Kim, L., Lavrinienko, A., Sebechlebská, Z., Stoltenberg, S., & Bokulich, N. A. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf777 · Cited by 10
Mukhtar, A., Hadwiger, M., Wotawa, F., & Schweiger, G. (2025) · Energy and AI · doi:10.1016/j.egyai.2025.100658 · Cited by 11
On Fishing for Significance and Statistician’s Degree of Freedom in the Era of Big Molecular Data
Boulesteix, A., Hornung, R., & Sauerbrei, W. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-12153-2_7 · Cited by 9
Gan, R. W., Sun, D. K., Tatro, A. R., Cohen‐Mekelburg, S., Wiitala, W. L., Zhu, J., & Waljee, A. K. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0257520 · Cited by 9
An Open-Source Workflow for Spatiotemporal Studies with COVID-19 as an Example
Malarvizhi, A. S., Liu, Q., Sha, D., Lan, H., & Yang, C. P. (2021) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi11010013 · Cited by 11
Cook, R. J., & Lawless, J. F. (2023) · The Journal of Rheumatology · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2023-0499 · Cited by 9
Gender Bias Detection in Court Decisions: A Brazilian Case Study
Benatti, R. M., Severi, F. C., Avila, S., & Colombini, E. L. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658937 · Cited by 14
Using the Seven Bridges Cancer Genomics Cloud to Access and Analyze Petabytes of Cancer Data
Malhotra, R., Seth, I., Lehnert, E. M., Zhao, J., Kaushik, G. N., Williams, E. H., Sethi, A., & Davis‐Dusenbery, B. N. (2017) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.39 · Cited by 9
WURS: a simulation software for university rankings—software review
Sınıksaran, E., & Satman, M. H. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03269-8 · Cited by 9
Computational experiment design for operations model simulation
Lara, J. D., Lee, J. T., Callaway, D. S., & Hodge, B. S. (2020) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2020.106680 · Cited by 10
The Role of Containers in Reproducibility
Canon, R. S. (2020) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Containers and New Orchestration Paradigms for Isolated Environments in HPC (CANOPIE-HPC) · doi:10.1109/canopiehpc51917.2020.00008 · Cited by 10
Montemayor, C., Simone, A., Long, J., Montemayor, O. A., Delvadia, B., Rivera, R., Lewis, K. L., Shahsavari, S., Gandla, D., Dura, K., et al. (2021) · Vox Sanguinis · doi:10.1111/vox.13035 · Cited by 9
Hassanzadeh, P. (2021) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119400 · Cited by 9
Rogeaulito: A World Energy Scenario Modeling Tool for Transparent Energy System Thinking
Benichou, L., & Mayr, S. (2014) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2013.00013 · Cited by 9
Single image super resolution with guided back-projection and LoG sharpening
Ngocho, B. M., & Mwangi, E. (2016) · IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON) · doi:10.1109/melcon.2016.7495419 · Cited by 8
Russo, F., Righelli, D., & Angelini, C. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44332-4_19 · Cited by 9
Costa, V., Righelli, D., Russo, F., Berardinis, P. D., Angelini, C., & D’Apice, L. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18030494 · Cited by 9
EnosStack: A LAMP-like stack for the experimenter
Cherrueau, R.-A., Simonin, M., & van Kempen, A. (2018) · IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS) · doi:10.1109/infcomw.2018.8407024 · Cited by 9
INTEREST: INteractive Tool for Exploring REsults from Simulation sTudies
Gasparini, A., Morris, T., & Crowther, M. (2019) · Journal of Data Science Statistics and Visualisation · doi:10.52933/jdssv.v1i4.9 · Cited by 8
Case Studies and Challenges in Reproducibility in the Computational SciencesPreprint
Arabas, S., Bareford, M., de Silva, L. R., Gent, I. P., Gorman, B. M., Hajiarabderkani, M., Henderson, T., Hutton, L., Konovalov, O., Kotthoff, L., et al. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1408.2123 · Cited by 9
Design and Use of Computational Notebooks
Rule, A. (2018) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 10
Progress toward openness, transparency, and reproducibility in cognitive neurosciencePreprint
Gilmore, R. O., Diaz, M. T., Wyble, B., & Yarkoni, T. (2017) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/5veew · Cited by 11
Detailed Implementation of a Reproducible Machine Learning-Enabled Workflow
Schackart, K., Imker, H. J., & Cook, C. E. (2024) · Data Science Journal · doi:10.5334/dsj-2024-023 · Cited by 8
Guidelines for reproducible analysis of adaptive immune receptor repertoire sequencing data
Peres, A., Klein, V., Frankel, B., Lees, W., Polak, P., Meehan, M., Rocha, A., Lopes, J. C., & Yaari, G. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae221 · Cited by 8
Cáceres-Tello, J., & Galán-Hernández, J. J. (2024) · AppliedMath · doi:10.3390/appliedmath4040076 · Cited by 8
From policy to practice: progress towards data- and code-sharing in ecology and evolution
Ivimey‐Cook, E. R., Sánchez‐Tójar, A., Berberi, I., Čulina, A., Roche, D. G., Almeida, R. A., Amin, B., Bairos‐Novak, K. R., Balti, H., Bertram, M. G., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2025.1394 · Cited by 22
Guidelines for collaborative development of sustainable data treatment software
Wuttke, J., Cottrell, S. P., Gonzalez, M. A., Kaestner, A. P., Markvardsen, A. J., Rod, T. H., Rozyczko, P. B., & Vardanyan, G. (2022) · Journal of Neutron Research · doi:10.3233/jnr-220002 · Cited by 10
Reproducibility challenges in robotic surgery
Faragasso, A., & Bonsignorio, F. (2023) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2023.1127972 · Cited by 8
Writing statistical methods for ecologists
Davis, A. J., & Kay, S. L. (2023) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.4539 · Cited by 8
Predicting coin flips: using resampling and hierarchical models to help untangle the NHL’s shoot-out
Lopez, M. J., & Schuckers, M. E. (2016) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2016.1198046 · Cited by 8
Wirtz, D., & Nowak, W. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.10.003 · Cited by 8
Reproducibility Analysis of Scientific Workflows
Bánáti, A., Kacsuk, P., & Kozlovszky, M. (2017) · Acta Polytechnica Hungarica · doi:10.12700/aph.14.2.2017.2.11 · Cited by 8
Strategies for integrated analysis in imaging genetics studies
Vilor‐Tejedor, N., Alemany, S., Cáceres, A., Bustamante, M., Pujol, J., Sunyer, J., & González, J. R. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.06.013 · Cited by 8
Using the Google Web 1T 5-Gram Corpus for OCR Error Correction
Cacho, J. R. F., Taghva, K., & Alvarez, D. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14070-0_71 · Cited by 8
From digital hype to analogue reality: Universal simulation beyond the quantum and exascale eras
Coveney, P. V., & Highfield, R. (2020) · Journal of Computational Science · doi:10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101093 · Cited by 8
GeenaR: A Web Tool for Reproducible MALDI-TOF Analysis
Prete, E. D., Facchiano, A. M., Profumo, A., Angelini, C., & Romano, P. D. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.635814 · Cited by 8
MadingleyR: An R package for mechanistic ecosystem modelling
Hoeks, S., Tucker, M. A., Huijbregts, M. A. J., Harfoot, M. B. J., Bithell, M., & Santini, L. (2021) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/geb.13354 · Cited by 8
Towards Improving Experimentation in Software Engineering
OliveiraJr, E., Furtado, V. R., Vignando, H., Luz, C. D., Cordeiro, A. F. R., Steinmacher, I., & Zorzo, A. F. (2021) · Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3474624.3477073 · Cited by 8
Pre-statistical harmonization of behavioral instruments across eight surveys and trials
Chen, D., Jutkowitz, E., Iosepovici, S. L., Lin, J. C. H., & Gross, A. L. (2021) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01431-6 · Cited by 8
Towards Better User Studies in Computer Graphics and Vision
Bylinskii, Z., Hertzmann, A., Zhang, Y., Herman, L., & Hutka, S. (2023) · Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision · doi:10.1561/0600000106 · Cited by 10
Nègre, D., Larhlimi, A., & Bertrand, S. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289757 · Cited by 8
Energy, economics, replication & reproduction
Racine, J. S. (2017) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2017.06.027 · Cited by 8
Detailed Provenance Capture of Data Processing
Meester, B. D., Dimou, A., Verborgh, R., & Mannens, E. (2017) · Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) · Cited by 8
Potential use of R-statistical programming in the field of geoscience
Bishwal, R. M. (2017) · IEEE International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) · doi:10.1109/i2ct.2017.8226275 · Cited by 8
Simmons, J. E., Eide, I., Rice, G. E., & Feder, P. I. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-56234-6_13 · Cited by 8
Cultural Genomics: Promises and Challenges
Chen, C., & Moyzis, R. K. (2018) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022117736526 · Cited by 8
Modeling population heterogeneity from microbial communities to immune response in cells
Pecht, T., Aschenbrenner, A. C., Ulas, T., & Succurro, A. (2019) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-019-03378-w · Cited by 11
Feygin, S., Lazarus, J. R., Forscher, E. H., Golfier-Vetterli, V., Lee, J., Gupta, A., Waraich, R. A., Sheppard, C., & Bayen, A. M. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3384344 · Cited by 8
Open Science in Machine Learning
Braun, M. L., & Ong, C. S. (2018) · Chapman & Hall/CRC eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315373461-13 · Cited by 8
(2019) · Converging evidence in language and communication research · doi:10.1075/celcr.20.c18 · Cited by 6
Performance-Based Screening of Porous Materials for Carbon Capture
Farmahini, A. H., Krishnamurthy, S., Friedrich, D., Brandani, S., & Sarkisov, L. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c01266 · Cited by 7
Recent Advances in Biological Omics Databases and Tools in Human Health
Kaithal, P., Kanchan, S., & Kesheri, M. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-1769-9_12 · Cited by 7
Machot, F. A., Horsch, M., & Ullah, H. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89274-5_3 · Cited by 7
Taraghi, M., & Yoder, L. (2025) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2025.111231 · Cited by 7
Archiving Software Surrogates on the Web for Future Reference
Holzmann, H., Sperber, W., & Runnwerth, M. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43997-6_17 · Cited by 7
Qualitätsdimensionen maschinellen Lernens in der amtlichen Statistik
Saidani, Y., Dumpert, F., Borgs, C., Brand, A., Nickl, A., Rittmann, A., Rohde, J., Salwiczek, C., Storfinger, N., & Straub, S. (2023) · AStA Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv · doi:10.1007/s11943-023-00329-7 · Cited by 7
Wirz, C. D., Sutter, C., Demuth, J. L., Mayer, K. J., Chapman, W. E., Cains, M. G., Radford, J. T., Przybylo, V. M., Evans, A., Martin, T., et al. (2024) · Earth and Space Science · doi:10.1029/2023ea003364 · Cited by 7
Bridging consciousness and AI: ChatGPT-assisted phenomenological analysis
Martínez‐Pernía, D., Troncoso, A., Chaigneau, S. E., Marchant, N., Zepeda, A., & Blanco, K. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1520186 · Cited by 8
Towards Automated Event Studies Using High Frequency News and Trading Data
Bohn, N., Rabhi, F., Kundisch, D., Yao, L., & Mutter, T. (2013) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36219-4_2 · Cited by 7
Chakraborty, J., Maltzahn, C., & Jimenez, I. (2020) · IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Containers and New Orchestration Paradigms for Isolated Environments in HPC (CANOPIE-HPC) · doi:10.1109/canopiehpc51917.2020.00007 · Cited by 7
Reproducible Analyses in Education Research
LeBeau, B. C., Ellison, S., & Aloe, A. M. (2021) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x20985076 · Cited by 9
SweetPea: A standard language for factorial experimental design
Musslick, S., Cherkaev, A., Draut, B., Butt, A. S., Darragh, P., Srikumar, V., Flatt, M., & Cohen, J. D. (2021) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01598-2 · Cited by 11
Jayawardana, Y., Ashok, V. G., & Jayarathna, S. (2022) · ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1145/3529372.3530936 · Cited by 7
Open-source code repository attributes predict impact of computer science research
Bhattarai, P., Ghassemi, M. M., & Alhanai, T. (2022) · ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1145/3529372.3530927 · Cited by 7
Knöpfle, P., & Schatto‐Eckrodt, T. (2024) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.7789 · Cited by 7
Analyzing data citation practices according to the Data Citation Index.
Robinson‐García, N., Jiménez‐Contreras, E., & Torres‐Salinas, D. (2015) · Cited by 7
Interval metamodels for the analysis of simulation Input–Output relations
Kamiński, B. (2015) · Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory · doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2015.03.008 · Cited by 7
The Need for Formally Defining “Modern Medicine” by Means of Experimental Design
Emmert‐Streib, F., Tuomisto, L., & Yli-Harja, O. P. (2016) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2016.00060 · Cited by 7
DNA methylation studies of depression with onset in the peripartum: A critical systematic review
Braun, S. E., Lapato, D. M., Brown, R., Lancaster, E. E., York, T. P., Amstadter, A. B., & Kinser, P. A. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.04.005 · Cited by 8
Gsmodutils: a python based framework for test-driven genome scale metabolic model development
Gilbert, J., Pearcy, N., Norman, R. O. J., Millat, T., Winzer, K., King, J. R., Hodgman, C. T., Minton, N. P., & Twycross, J. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz088 · Cited by 7
Muthusi, J., Mwalili, S. M., & Young, P. W. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0214262 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Peng, Roger D.
- ORCID
- Peng, Roger D.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2011-12-02
- Volume
- 334
- Issue
- 6060
- Pages
- 1226-1227
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC3383002
- OpenAlex
- W2008985174
- Semantic Scholar
- e4625641d1072542315c14083befb43cd7096aba
- Cited by
- 1,449
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 162 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 162 · 2018: 138 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 98.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES019560)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- reproducible research, scientific computing, reproducibility, scientific claims, replication
- MeSH terms
- Computers, Publishing, Research, Reproducibility of Results, Computational Biology, Editorial Policies, Biomedical Research, Biostatistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review