The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproducible Research in Computational Science
Open accessAbstract
Computational science has led to exciting new developments, but the nature of the work has exposed limitations in our ability to evaluate published findings. Reproducibility has the potential to serve as a minimum standard for judging scientific claims when full independent replication of a study is not possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The difficulty in auditing spreadsheets makes them generally incompatible with the principles of computational reproducibility [5].”
From Gene name errors: Lessons not learned (2021) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The rough consensus reduces to three ingredients.”
From Designing reproducible large-language-model-assisted scientific analyses (2026) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“We develop a two-step attribution process which combines a transparent and reproducible 39,40 machine learning approach to identifying studies on observed climate impacts with model-based assessments of detectable anthropogenic contributions to historical temperature and precipitation trends.”
From Machine-learning-based evidence and attribution mapping of 100,000 climate impact studies (2021) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Allison, D. B., Ball, C. A., Coulibaly, I., Cui, X., Culhane, A. C., Falchi, M., Furlanello, C., Game, L., Jurman, G., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.295 · Cited by 551
King, G. (1995) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096500057607 · Cited by 472
Publish your computer code: it is good enough
Barnes, N. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/467753a · Cited by 317
Accessible Reproducible Research
Mesirov, J. P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1179653 · Cited by 311
Reproducible Epidemiologic Research
Peng, R. D., Dominici, F., & Zeger, S. L. (2006) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwj093 · Cited by 292
Self-citationReproducible research and Biostatistics
Peng, R. D. (2009) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxp014 · Cited by 245
Self-citationMaking scientific computations reproducible
Schwab, M., Karrenbach, N., & Claerbout, J. F. (2000) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/5992.881708 · Cited by 232
Reproducible Research: Moving toward Research the Public Can Really Trust
Laine, C., Goodman, S. N., Griswold, M. E., & Sox, H. C. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-6-200703200-00154 · Cited by 213
Making Data Maximally Available
Hanson, B., Sugden, A. M., & Alberts, B. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1203354 · Cited by 172
King, G. (1995) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.2307/420301 · Cited by 145
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Yale Law School Roundtable on Data and Code Sharing, Comput. Sci. Eng. 12, 8 (2010).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,003
Replicability: 21st Century Crisis of the Positivist Social Sciences
Kalelioğlu, U. B. (2021) · Uluslararası Sosyal Bilgilerde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi (IJONASS) · doi:10.38015/sbyy.1003103 · Cited by 4
A Practical Guide to Reproducible Modeling for Biochemical Networks
Porubsky, V. L., & Sauro, H. M. (2023) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-3008-2_5 · Cited by 4
Pragmatic reproducible research: improving the research process from raw data to results, bit by bit
Rasmussen, L. V., Whitley, E. W., & Welty, L. J. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci173741 · Cited by 4
Data Discovery for the SDGs: A Systematic Rule-based Approach
Jiang, Y.-W., & Johnson, D. (2023) · International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good (GoodIT) · doi:10.1145/3582515.3609557 · Cited by 4
Laying Foundations to Quantify the “Effort of Reproducibility”
Akella, A. P., Koop, D., & Alhoori, H. (2023) · ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries · doi:10.1109/jcdl57899.2023.00018 · Cited by 5
Information disclosure, spillovers, and knowledge accumulation
Kang, Y., Leng, X., Liao, Y., & Zheng, S. (2024) · China Economic Review · doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102135 · Cited by 4
Picault, S., Niang, G., Sicard, V., Sorin, B., Assié, S., & Ezanno, P. (2024) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106233 · Cited by 4
GasanalyzeR: advancing reproducible research using a new R package for photosynthesis data workflows
Tholen, D. (2024) · AoB Plants · doi:10.1093/aobpla/plae035 · Cited by 4
Ten simple rules for training scientists to make better software
Gallagher, K., Creswell, R., Lambert, B. C., Robinson, M. J., Lei, C. L., Mirams, G. R., & Gavaghan, D. J. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012410 · Cited by 4
A transformer-based multi-feature fusion method for detecting traffic events using Twitter data
Qutaishat, D., & Li, S. (2025) · Big Earth Data · doi:10.1080/20964471.2025.2564525 · Cited by 4
Data Accessibility, Reproducibility and Trustworthiness with LAGO Data Repositories
Mayo-García, R., Nuñez, L. A., Asorey, H., Rodríguez-Pascual, M., Ramirez, D. C., & Torres-Niño, L. (2016) · International Cosmic Ray Conference · doi:10.22323/1.236.0672 · Cited by 4
Model Builder for Item Factor Analysis with OpenMx
Joshua, N. P., & Karen, M. S. (2016) · The R Journal · doi:10.32614/rj-2016-013 · Cited by 4
Simulation of the leaky pipeline: Gender diversity in U.S. K-graduate education
Andalib, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Simulation · doi:10.1080/17477778.2019.1620650 · Cited by 4
Patias, N. (2020) · REGION · doi:10.18335/region.v6i3.277 · Cited by 4
Internal replication of computational workflows in scientific research
Benjamin‐Chung, J., Colford, J. M., Mertens, A., Hubbard, A., & Arnold, B. F. (2020) · Gates Open Research · doi:10.12688/gatesopenres.13108.2 · Cited by 4
Magaña, P., Del-Rosal-Salido, J., Cobos, M., Loarca, A. L., & Ortega‐Sánchez, M. (2020) · Journal of Marine Science and Engineering · doi:10.3390/jmse8050350 · Cited by 4
Stodden, V. (2020) · International Workshop on Practical Reproducible Evaluation of Computer Systems (P-RECS) · doi:10.1145/3391800.3398172 · Cited by 6
A Personality Mining System for German Twitter Posts With Global Vectors Word Embedding
Usselmann, H., Ahmad, R., & Siemon, D. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3130937 · Cited by 4
Maximizing the utility of public data
吉村, 克., Kim, H. J., & Kim, D. R. (2023) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2023.1106631 · Cited by 4
Morrow, M., MaWhinney, S., Brooks, K. M., Huntley, R., Castillo‐Mancilla, J., Anderson, P. L., & Kiser, J. J. (2022) · Contemporary Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/j.cct.2022.107051 · Cited by 4
Reproducibility and FAIR principles: the case of a segment polarity network model
Mendes, P. (2023) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2023.1201673 · Cited by 5
Sugolov, A., Emmenegger, E., Paterson, A. D., & Sun, L. (2023) · Statistics in Biosciences · doi:10.1007/s12561-023-09375-9 · Cited by 4
Data and Code Availability in Political Science Publications from 1995 to 2022
Rainey, C., Roe, H., Wang, Q., & Zhou, H. (2025) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096524001276 · Cited by 4
Reproducible Research in Speech Sciences
Abari, K. (2012) · Cited by 4
Haas, C. N. (2016) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12730 · Cited by 5
Cancer survivability with logistic regression
Bozorgi, M., Taghva, K., & Singh, A. K. (2017) · 2017 Computing Conference · doi:10.1109/sai.2017.8252133 · Cited by 4
Hallgren, W., Santana, F., Low-Choy, S., Rehn, J., & Mackey, B. (2017) · MODSIM · doi:10.36334/modsim.2017.a1.hallgren · Cited by 4
Efficient Scientific Self-Correction in Times of Crisis
Nuijten, M. B. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65355-2_23 · Cited by 4
The approach to reproducible research of the Image Processing On Line (IPOL) journal
Nicolaï, A., Bammey, Q., Gardella, M., Nikoukhah, T., Boulant, O., Bargiotas, I., Monzón, N., Truong, C., Kerautret, B., Monasse, P., et al. (2022) · Informatio · doi:10.35643/info.27.1.7 · Cited by 4
Creating Reproducible Agent Based Models Using Formal Methods
Kehoe, J. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67477-3_3 · Cited by 4
Long term availability of raw experimental data in experimental fracture mechanics
Diehl, P., Tabiai, I., Baumann, F. W., Therriault, D., & Lévesque, M. (2018) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2018.04.030 · Cited by 4
Economiccomplexity: Computational Methods for Economic Complexity
Vargas, M. (2020) · The Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.01866 · Cited by 4
ActivePapers: a platform for publishing and archiving computer-aided research
Hinsen, K. (2015) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.5773.2 · Cited by 4
Frery, A. C. (2015) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters · doi:10.1109/lgrs.2015.2404211 · Cited by 4
Reproducibility as a Technical SpecificationPreprint
Crick, T., Hall, B. A., & Ishtiaq, S. S. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.01310 · Cited by 4
Boutiques: a flexible framework for automated application integration in computing platformsPreprint
Glatard, T., Kiar, G., Aumentado‐Armstrong, T., Beck, N., Bellec, P., Bernard, R., Bonnet, A., Camarasu-Pop, S., Cervenansky, F., Das, S., et al. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.09713 · Cited by 4
Samota, E. K., & Davey, R. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/581033 · Cited by 4
Research data management for open science
Lefebvre, A. (2021) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · doi:10.33540/447 · Cited by 4
LabInform: A Modular Laboratory Information SystemBuilt From Open Source ComponentsPreprint
Biskup, T. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-vz360 · Cited by 4
Word final schwa is driven by intonation – the case of Bari ItalianPreprint
Grice, M., Savino, M., & Roettger, T. B. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/e9cug · Cited by 4
Yarus, J. M., Yarus, J. M., & French, R. H. (2023) · Encyclopedia of earth sciences series/Encyclopedia of earth sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85040-1_137 · Cited by 5
Dörr, A.-K., Welling, J., Dörr, A., Gosch, J., Möhlen, H., Schmithausen, R. M., Kehrmann, J., Meyer, F., & Kraiselburd, I. (2024) · Gigabyte · doi:10.46471/gigabyte.132 · Cited by 3
Algorithms and software for open quantum system dynamics
Chin, A. W., Keeling, J., Segal, D., & Wang, H. (2025) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0289390 · Cited by 3
Natural language processing enhanced literature reviews
Liu, D., Thomas, M. A., & Yan, L. (2025) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962251371062 · Cited by 5
Griego, C. D., Scotti, K. L., Terveen, E., Chan, J., Sheng, D., González-Espinoza, A., & Warren, C. (2025) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.156917.2 · Cited by 3
Ten simple rules for effective research data management
Hassenstein, M. J., & Jung, K. (2025) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013779 · Cited by 3
Transparent reporting is central to reproducible radiological AI research: A call to action
White, S. J., Yaxley, K. L., To, M., & Chau, M. T. (2026) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2026.112777 · Cited by 3
The Interoperability Challenge in DFT Workflows Across Implementations
Steensen, S. K., Thakur, T. S., Dillenz, M., Carlsson, J. M., Rêgo, C. R. C., Flores, E., Hajiyani, H., Hanke, F., García-Lastra, J. M., Wenzel, W., et al. (2026) · Advanced Intelligent Discovery · doi:10.1002/aidi.202500232 · Cited by 3
Nine quick tips for software containerization
Moreau, D., & Wiebels, K. (2026) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014197 · Cited by 4
Third Time’s a Charm: A Tripartite Approach for Teaching Project Organization to Students
Mehta, C. C., & Moore, R. H. (2022) · Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education · doi:10.1080/26939169.2022.2118644 · Cited by 3
Towards a Science of Humanities: How Big Data can Solve the Limitations of Scientometrics
Arroyo‐Machado, W., & Robinson‐García, N. (2023) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110753523-006 · Cited by 3
Ikäheimonen, A., Li, J., Yao, K., Zuo, S., Aledavood, T., & Hölttä‐Otto, K. (2024) · Journal of Engineering Design · doi:10.1080/09544828.2024.2396194 · Cited by 3
How to write a scientific paper in fifteen steps
Drake, J. M., & Han, B. A. (2025) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013505 · Cited by 3
Context is Key for Reproducibility of Empirical Studies in Human-Computer Interaction
Vanderdonckt, J. M., & Vatavu, R.-D. (2025) · ACM Conference on Reproducibility and Replicability (ACM REP) · doi:10.1145/3736731.3746142 · Cited by 3
Opening Doors to Sharing Social Media Data
Morstatter, F., Liu, H., & Zeng, D. D. (2012) · IEEE Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1109/mis.2012.19 · Cited by 3
Classification of scientific workflows based on reproducibility analysis
Banati, A., Kacsuk, P., & Kozlovszky, M. (2016) · International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics · doi:10.1109/mipro.2016.7522161 · Cited by 3
Language-Agnostic Reproducible Data Analysis Using Literate Programming
Vassilev, B., Louhimo, R., Ikonen, E., & Hautaniemi, S. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164023 · Cited by 5
Scientific Visualization and Reproducibility for "Open" Environmental Science
Cushing, J. B., Lach, D. H., Zanocco, C. M., & Halama, J. J. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2018.8622039 · Cited by 3
GHTraffic: A Dataset for Reproducible Research in Service-Oriented Computing
Bhagya, T., Dietrich, J. B., Guesgen, H. W., & Versteeg, S. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS) · doi:10.1109/icws.2018.00023 · Cited by 3
A multiple testing framework for diagnostic accuracy studies with co‐primary endpoints
Westphal, M., Zapf, A., & Brannath, W. (2022) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.9308 · Cited by 4
The Missing Pieces of Open Design Enablement: A Recent History of Google Efforts : lnvited Paper
Ansell, T., & Saligane, M. (2020) · International Conference on Computer Aided Design · Cited by 3
Social Influence Leads to the Formation of Diverse Local Trends
Epstein, Z., Groh, M., Dubey, A., & Pentland, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3479553 · Cited by 6
A Dockerized big data architecture for sports analytics
Özgüven, Y. M., Gönener, U., & Eken, S. (2022) · Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.2298/csis220118010o · Cited by 3
Sánchez‐Reyes, L. L., & McTavish, E. J. (2022) · Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education · doi:10.1080/26939169.2022.2099487 · Cited by 3
Research Data Curation in Visualization : Position Paper
Garkov, D., Müller, C., Braun, M., Weiskopf, D., & Schreiber, F. (2022) · IEEE Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches for Visualization (BELIV) · doi:10.1109/beliv57783.2022.00011 · Cited by 3
Mazzola, G. B., Baker, D. J., Vukovics, K., Davis, C. M., & Elliott, E. M. (2023) · Musicae Scientiae · doi:10.1177/10298649221149109 · Cited by 9
Ten simple rules for working with other people’s code
Pilgrim, C., Kent, P. R. C., Hosseini, K., & Chalstrey, E. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011031 · Cited by 3
A reproducible and replicable approach for harmonizing Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 images
Marujo, R. F. B., Carlos, F. M., da Costa, R. W., Arcanjo, J. S., Fronza, J. G., Soares, A. R., de Queiroz, G. R., & Ferreira, K. R. (2023) · Frontiers in Remote Sensing · doi:10.3389/frsen.2023.1254242 · Cited by 3
Hussein, H., Farfar, K. E., Oelen, A., Karras, O., & Auer, S. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-8088-8_19 · Cited by 3
A systematic approach for assessing the importance of visual differences in reproduced maps
Koukouraki, E., & Kray, C. (2024) · Cartography and Geographic Information Science · doi:10.1080/15230406.2024.2409920 · Cited by 3
Standard methods and good practices in Apis honey bee omics research
Techer, M. A., Chakrabarti, P., Caesar, L., Eynard, S. E., Farrell, M., Foster, L. J., Gorrochategui-Ortega, J., Henriques, D., Li‐Byarlay, H., Morré, J. T., et al. (2025) · Journal of Apicultural Research · doi:10.1080/00218839.2025.2455852 · Cited by 5
Kuczyńska, M., Kot, M., Stocki, M., Zapora, E., Jagielski, T., Perlińska-Teresiak, M., & Kalińska, A. (2025) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms26125451 · Cited by 3
Enabling reproducible obia with open-source software in docker containers
Knoth, C., & Nüst, D. (2016) · International Conference on Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) · doi:10.3990/2.456 · Cited by 3
Learnings from developing an applied data science curricula for undergraduate and graduate students
French, R. H., & Bruckman, L. S. (2020) · MRS Advances · doi:10.1557/adv.2020.135 · Cited by 3
Summit: Automated Analysis of Arrayed Single-Cell Gel Electrophoresis
Vlassakis, J., Yamauchi, K. A., & Herr, A. E. (2021) · SLAS TECHNOLOGY · doi:10.1177/24726303211036869 · Cited by 3
Selden, R. Z. (2022) · Lithic Technology · doi:10.1080/01977261.2022.2095492 · Cited by 3
A Framework to capture and reproduce the Absolute State of Jupyter Notebooks
Wannipurage, D., Marru, S., & Pierce, M. (2022) · Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing · doi:10.1145/3491418.3530296 · Cited by 3
Perdiz arrow points from Caddo burial contexts aid in defining discrete behavioral regions
Selden, R. Z., & Dockall, J. E. (2023) · Southeastern Archaeology · doi:10.1080/0734578x.2023.2182260 · Cited by 3
Reproducibility and Its Application to Technical Service Processes
Mitchell, E. T. (2015) · Technical Services Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07317131.2015.1059681 · Cited by 3
A Modelling Ecosystem for Prognostics
Astfalck, L., Hodkiewicz, M. R., KEATING, A. J., Cripps, E., & PECHT, M. G. (2016) · Annual Conference of the PHM Society · doi:10.36001/phmconf.2016.v8i1.2568 · Cited by 3
Role of pitch in perceiving politeness in Korean.
Idemaru, K., Winter, B., & Brown, L. (2015) · ICPhS · Cited by 3
Alencar, P., Cowan, D. D., Mulholland, D., MacVicar, B., Courtenay, S. C., Murphy, S. D., & McGarry, F. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) · doi:10.1109/bigdata.2017.8258408 · Cited by 3
Andersen, J. B., Bertelsen, M. B., Schou, M. H., Ciosici, M. R., & Assent, I. (2020) · Workshop on Evaluation and Comparison of NLP Systems (Eval4NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.eval4nlp-1.12 · Cited by 3
Welty, L. J., Rasmussen, L. V., Baldridge, A. S., & Whitley, E. W. (2020) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa043 · Cited by 3
NPARS—A Novel Approach to Address Accuracy and Reproducibility in Genomic Data Science
Ma, L., Peterson, E. A., Shin, I. J., Muesse, J. L., Marino, K., Steliga, M. A., & Johann, D. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2021.725095 · Cited by 3
Reproducible Spectrum and Hyperspectrum Data Analysis Using NeXL
Ritchie, N. W. M. (2022) · Microscopy and Microanalysis · doi:10.1017/s143192762200023x · Cited by 4
Computational science: shifting the focus from tools to models
Hinsen, K. (2014) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.3978.1 · Cited by 3
Diagnostische Tests mit R und knitr
Spoden, C., & Buchwald, F. (2017) · Diagnostica · doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000189 · Cited by 3
Pixel: a content management platform for quantitative omics data
Denecker, T., Durand, W., Maupetit, J., Hébert, C., Camadro, J., Poulain, P., & Lelandais, G. (2019) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.6623 · Cited by 3
Michener, W. K. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-59928-1_7 · Cited by 3
A Framework for Reproducible, Interactive Research: Application to health and social sciencesPreprint
Vissoci, J. R. N., Rodrigues, C. G., de Andrade, L., Santana, J. E., Zaveri, A. J., & Pietrobon, R. S. (2013) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1304.5688 · Cited by 3
An Open Science Platform for the Next Generation of DataPreprint
Sweeney, L., & Crosas, M. (2013) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2302084 · Cited by 4
Scientific notations for the digital eraPreprint
Hinsen, K. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1605.02960 · Cited by 3
Linked Data in Neuroscience: Applications, Benefits, and ChallengesPreprint
Nichols, B. N., Ghosh, S., Auer, T., Grabowski, T. J., Maumet, C., Keator, D. B., Martone, M. E., Pohl, K. M., & Poline, J. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/053934 · Cited by 4
Perceptions, motivations and behaviours towards 'research impact': a cross-disciplinary perspective
Chikoore, L. (2016) · Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) · Cited by 3
YAMP: a containerised workflow enabling reproducibility in metagenomics researchPreprint
Visconti, A., Martin, T. C., & Falchi, M. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/223016 · Cited by 4
Video can make science more open, transparent, robust, and reproduciblePreprint
Gilmore, R. O., & Adolph, K. E. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/tcfqf · Cited by 3
Towards a Culture of Open Science and Data Sharing in Health and Medical Research
Rowhani-Farid, A. (2018) · Queensland University of Technology · doi:10.5204/thesis.eprints.119697 · Cited by 3
Mouse Model Systems of Autism Spectrum Disorder: Replicability and Informatics SignaturePreprint
Kabitzke, P., Morales, D. V., He, D., Cox, K., Sutphen, J. C., Thiede, L., Sabath, E. V., Hanania, T., Biemans, B., & Brunner, D. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/561233 · Cited by 3
Computational and informatics advances for reproducible data analysis in neuroimagingPreprint
Poldrack, R. A., Gorgolewski, K. J., & Varoquaux, G. P. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.10024 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Peng, R. D.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Peng, Roger D.
- ORCID
- Peng, Roger D.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2011-12-02
- Volume
- 334
- Issue
- 6060
- Pages
- 1226-1227
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC3383002
- OpenAlex
- W2008985174
- Semantic Scholar
- e4625641d1072542315c14083befb43cd7096aba
- Cited by
- 1,449
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 162 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 85 · 2021: 121 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 162 · 2018: 138 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 106 · 2015: 82 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 98.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES019560)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- reproducible research, scientific computing, reproducibility, scientific claims, replication
- MeSH terms
- Computers, Publishing, Research, Reproducibility of Results, Computational Biology, Editorial Policies, Biomedical Research, Biostatistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review