The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Absence of Detectable Arsenate in DNA from Arsenate-Grown GFAJ-1 Cells
Open accessAbstract
Resisting Arsenic: The discovery of a bacterium living in the extreme conditions of Mono Lake, California, created a major controversy because it was claimed to be able to grow solely on arsenic and could substitute arsenate for phosphate in its key macromolecules, including DNA. Working with the same Halomonas spp. bacterium, known as GFAJ-1, and ultrapure reagents, Erb et al. (p. 467 ) found that the bacterium needed a low level of phosphate (1.6 µM) to grow at all. Rather than significant specific arsenic incorporation, when the organism was grown in 40 mM arsenic, its nucleic acids acquired a trace of arsenic. Similarly, Reaves et al. (p. 470 ) found that GFAJ-1 could not grow in the absence of phosphate and, moreover, that its growth was not stimulated by the addition of arsenate, although a trace amount of arsenic was also detected in DNA. Thus, GFAJ-1 shows no particular facility to substitute arsenic for phosphate, when phosphate is limiting, but it can tolerate high concentrations of the poison while efficiently scavenging phosphate.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two independent efforts have failed to replicate the main results in the original manuscript claiming arsenic-substituted DNA.
“Furthermore, two independent efforts have failed to replicate the main results in the original manuscript (Erb et al., 2012; Reaves et al., 2012).”
From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Reaves et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1126/science.1197258 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmicb.2010.00132 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1201438 · DOI
- 10.1093/molbev/msg071 · DOI
- 10.1021/ic50217a052 · DOI
- 10.1084/jem.79.2.137 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.1202098 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040351 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1017261108 · DOI
- 10.1021/ac902837x · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-12-264 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility
Van Bavel, J. J., Mende-Siedlecki, P., Brady, W. J., & Reinero, D. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1521897113 · Cited by 398
Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Adamala, K., Arina de la Rubia, L., Bond, J., Dartnell, L. R., Goldman, A. D., Lynch, K., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460 · Cited by 136
“…which has generally concluded that they are not proven by the evidence presented in the paper (Benner, 2011; Borhani, 2011; Cotner and Hall, 2011; Csabai and Szathmáry, 2011; Foster, 2011; Oehler, 2011; Redfield, 2011; Schoepp-Cothenet et al., 2011; Erb et al., 2012; Reaves et al., 2012).”
Sources of error in the retracted scientific literature
Casadevall, A., Steen, R. G., & Fang, F. C. (2014) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.14-256735 · Cited by 89
Phosphorus Limitation, Uptake, and Turnover in Benthic Stream Algae
Steinman, A. D., & Duhamel, S. (2017) · Methods in Stream Ecology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813047-6.00011-5 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Reaves, M. L., Sinha, S., Rabinowitz, J. D., Kruglyak, L., & Redfield, R. J.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Redfield, Rosemary J.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2012-07-27
- Volume
- 337
- Issue
- 6093
- Pages
- 470-473
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC3845625
- OpenAlex
- W2052038373
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 13.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Arsenic contamination and mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Keywords
- Halomonas, arsenate, arsenic tolerance, phosphate limitation, nucleic acids, arsenic resistance, Mono Lake
- MeSH terms
- Arsenates, Arsenic, Centrifugation, Density Gradient, Chromatography, Liquid, Culture Media, DNA, Bacterial, Hydrolysis, Nucleotides, Phosphates, Phosphorus, Mass Spectrometry, Halomonadaceae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review