The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum-Enhanced Optical-Phase Tracking
Open accessAbstract
Keeping Track of Photon Phase: In optical interferometers or optical communications, information is often stored in terms of the phase of the waveform or light pulse. However, fluctuations and noise can give rise to random jitter in the phase and amplitude of the optical pulses, making it difficult to keep track of the phase. Yonezawa et al. (p. 1514 ) developed a technique based on quantum mechanical squeezing to determine the phase of randomly varying optical waveforms. The quantum mechanical technique enhanced the precision with which the phase could be determined and, as optical technologies continue to be miniaturized, should be helpful in applications within metrology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Giovannetti, V., Lloyd, S., & Maccone, L. (2011) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2011.35 · Cited by 3,894
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Caves, C. M. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 · Cited by 3,202
A gravitational wave observatory operating beyond the quantum shot-noise limit
The LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Abadie, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M., Adams, C., Adhikari, R., Affeldt, C., Allen, B., et al. (2011) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2083 · Cited by 921
Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation
Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Bartlett, S. D., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06257 · Cited by 628
Self-citation
Cited by
Enhanced sensitivity of the LIGO gravitational wave detector by using squeezed states of light
Aasi, J., Abadie, J., Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abernathy, M. R., Adams, C., Adams, T., Addesso, P., Adhikari, R. X., et al. (2013) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.177 · Cited by 1,204
Advances in photonic quantum sensing
Pirandola, S., Bardhan, B. R., Gehring, T., Weedbrook, C., & Lloyd, S. (2018) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0301-6 · Cited by 804
Quantum-enhanced measurements without entanglement
Braun, D., Adesso, G., Benatti, F., Floreanini, R., Marzolino, U., Mitchell, M. W., & Pirandola, S. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.035006 · Cited by 434
Quantum enhanced multiple phase estimation
Humphreys, P. C., Barbieri, M., Datta, A., & Walmsley, I. A. (2013) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.070403 · Cited by 379
Quantum feedback: Theory, experiments, and applications
Zhang, J., Liu, Y.-X., Wu, R.-B., Jacobs, K., & Nori, F. (2017) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.02.003 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Yonezawa, H., Nakane, D., Wheatley, T. A., Iwasawa, K., Takeda, S., Arao, H., Ohki, K., Tsumura, K., Berry, D. W., Ralph, T. C., Wiseman, H. M., Huntington, E. H., & Furusawa, A.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2012-09-21
- Volume
- 337
- Issue
- 6101
- Pages
- 1514-1517
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2319232757
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 18.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantum-Enhanced Optical-Phase Tracking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1225258
- The paper
- Yonezawa, H., Nakane, D., Wheatley, T. A., Iwasawa, K., Takeda, S., Arao, H., Ohki, K., Tsumura, K., Berry, D. W., Ralph, T. C., Wiseman, H. M., Huntington, E. H., & Furusawa, A. (2012). Quantum-Enhanced Optical-Phase Tracking. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225258
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
