Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Unraveling the Mechanism of Protein Disaggregation Through a ClpB-DnaK Interaction

Rosenzweig, Rina, Moradi, Shoeib, Zarrine-Afsar, Arash, Glover, John R., Kay, Lewis E.·2013·Science

Abstract

Dissecting Disaggregation: The excessive accumulation of misfolded protein aggregates can overwhelm the cell's "quality control" machinery, leading to cell death. The yeast Hsp104 protein and its bacterial homolog ClpB are molecular chaperones that can "rescue" aggregated proteins by coupling the force generated from adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis to the progressive unfolding and threading of extended polypeptide segments through axial channels in these large molecular machines. Unfolded polypeptides emerging from the channel are refolded with the aid of a second chaperone system, DnaK/DnaJ/GrpE. DnaK also plays an important role in bringing regions of polypeptides within aggregates to ClpB to begin the solubilization process. Rosenzweig et al. (p. 1080 , published online 7 February; see the Perspective by Saibil ) describe a nuclear magnetic resonance–derived structure of the ClpB-DnaK complex, and verified it through mutagenesis and functional assays. The work clarifies the roles of each of the molecular players in the disaggregation reaction and provides a structural basis for the DnaK-ClpB interaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1233066

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Rosenzweig, R., Moradi, S., Zarrine-Afsar, A., Glover, J. R., & Kay, L. E.
Venue
Science
Published
2013-03
Volume
339
Issue
6123
Pages
1080-1083
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2117195560
Cited by
260
References
2
FWCI
12.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.