Cited by 229RNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA modifications and cancerEnzyme Structure and Function

Crystal structures of EF-G-ribosome complexes trapped in intermediate states of translocation

Open access
Zhou, Jie, Lancaster, Laura, Donohue, John Paul, Noller, Harry F.·2013·Science

Abstract

Introduction: One of the most critical and complex steps of protein synthesis is the coupled translocation of mRNA and tRNAs (mRNA and tRNAs) through the ribosome, catalyzed by the guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) elongation factor EF-G. Although several of the main steps have been identified, the underlying molecular mechanisms of translocation are poorly understood. A central question is how structural rearrangements in the ribosome are coupled to movement of mRNA and tRNA. Methods: We trapped and crystallized complexes of Thermus thermophilus ribosomes bound with EF-G, mRNA, and tRNA, using the antibiotic fusidic acid (which prevents release of EF-G after GTP hydrolysis) or the nonhydrolyzable GTP analog GDPNP, in intermediate states of translocation. Their crystal structures were determined to resolutions from 3.5 to 4.1 Å. Results: The structures of the fusidic acid complex (Fus) and two GDPNP complexes (GDPNP-I and GDPNP-II) reveal conformational changes occurring during intermediate states of translocation, including large-scale (15° to 18°) rotation of the 30 S subunit head and 3° to 5° rotation of the 30 S body. In all complexes, the tRNA acceptor end has moved from the 50 S subunit P site to the 50 S E site, while the anticodon stem loop (ASL) and mRNA move with the head of the 30 S subunit to positions between the P and E sites, forming chimeric pe*/E intermediate states. The elongated, mobile domain IV of EF-G moves to contact the head of the 30 S subunit and the backbone of the mRNA. Two universally conserved bases of 16 S rRNA that intercalate between bases of the mRNA may act as “pawls” of a translocational ratchet. In the GDPNP complexes, structuring of the conserved switch loop I segment, which was disordered in previous structures, completes the cage that encloses GDPNP and fixes the relative geometry of EF-G domains I, III, and V. In the Fus complex, the position of fusidic acid overlaps that of switch loop I, stabilizing contacts between domains I and III that are normally made by the structured switch loop. Conclusion: Our structures capture intermediate states of the rate-limiting step of translocation, in which movement of the tRNA ASL and mRNA is coupled to rotational movement of the 30 S subunit head. Slippage of the translational reading frame during reverse rotation of the head during translocation may be prevented by intercalation of bases C1397 and A1503 of 16 S rRNA, which project from the body of the 30 S subunit, between mRNA bases. The antibiotic fusidic acid appears to stabilize binding of EF-G to the ribosome in the GDP state by mimicking the structure of the conserved core of switch loop I of EF-G in the GTP state.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1236086

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, J., Lancaster, L., Donohue, J. P., & Noller, H. F.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Noller, Harry F.
Venue
Science
Published
2013-06-28
Volume
340
Issue
6140
Pages
1236086-1236086
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2009185547
Cited by
229
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 12
FWCI
14.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (Y1-CO-1020)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM017129, GM 59140, Y1-GM-1104, R01GM059140, GM-105404, R01GM105404, GM-17129, P41GM103393)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
elongation factor G, ribosome, mRNA translocation, 16S rRNA, fusidic acid, nonhydrolyzable GTP analogs
MeSH terms
Fusidic Acid, Guanosine Triphosphate, Protein Conformation, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Transfer, Protein Biosynthesis, Thermus thermophilus, Crystallography, X-Ray, Peptide Elongation Factor G, Ribosome Subunits, Large, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review