Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The NIH BRAIN Initiative

Open access
Insel, Thomas R., Landis, Story C., Collins, Francis S.·2013·Science

Abstract

The NIH BRAIN Initiative will build on recent successes in neuroscience to create and apply new tools for understanding brain activity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1239276

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Insel, T. R., Landis, S. C., & Collins, F. S.
Venue
Science
Published
2013-05-10
Volume
340
Issue
6133
Pages
687-688
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1974267840
Cited by
335
References
6
FWCI
15.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The NIH BRAIN Initiative. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1239276
The paper
Insel, T. R., Landis, S. C., & Collins, F. S. (2013). The NIH BRAIN Initiative. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239276

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.