Cited by 91Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsReproductive Biology and Fertility

Nuclear Wave1 Is Required for Reprogramming Transcription in Oocytes and for Normal Development

Open access
Miyamoto, Kei, Teperek, Marta, Yusa, Kosuke, Allen, George E, Bradshaw, Charles R, Gurdon, J. B.·2013·Science

Abstract

Egg WAVE1: Eggs not only activate sperm nuclei for normal development but also reprogram transplanted somatic nuclei. In addition to its well-established cytoplasmic role in actin organization, Miyamoto et al. (p. 1002 ) discovered that the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein family member 1 in oocytes cooperates with transcriptional machineries in the nucleus to activate previously silenced genes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1240376

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nuclear WAVE1 was identified as a central regulator of the transcriptional reprogramming required for Xenopus oocyte development.

    “Nuclear WAVE1 was identified as a central regulator of the transcriptional reprogramming required for Xenopus oocyte development86.”

    From The WAVE complex in developmental and adulthood brain disorders (2025) · cites this paper as [86]

    The paper reports that nuclear Wave1 is necessary for efficient transcriptional reprogramming in Xenopus oocytes (passage 2). It links Wave1 to normal embryonic development, however, rather than showing that this reprogramming is required for oocyte development (passages 1 and 5). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The role of nuclear WAVE1 in gene activation during development is likely mediated by its WAVE homology domain, indicating the potential involvement of other subunits of the WAVE complex in nuclear programming.

    “The role of nuclear WAVE1 in gene activation during development is likely mediated by its WAVE homology domain (WHD), indicating the potential involvement of other subunits of the WAVE complex in nuclear programming86.”

    From The WAVE complex in developmental and adulthood brain disorders (2025) · cites this paper as [86]

    The passage labeled Abstract (page not given) says nuclear Wave1 acts through its WHD domain, which mediates interaction with transcription regulators and affects hox-gene activation. It does not identify other WAVE-complex subunits or suggest that they participate in nuclear programming; that part is an inference beyond the paper's stated findings. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • WAVE1 knockdown in embryos results in defective Hox gene activation and abnormal development.

    “WAVE1 knockdown in embryos results in defective Hox gene activation and abnormal development.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1]Jullien J Pasque V Halley-Stott RP Miyamoto K Gurdon JB Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2011 12 453 459 21697902 PMC3657683
  2. [2]Kim K Nature 2010 467 285 290 20644535 PMC3150836
  3. [3]Gao S Biol. Reprod 2002 67 928 934 12193404
  4. [4]Ogushi S Science 2008 319 613 616 18239124
  5. [5]Miyamoto K Pasque V Jullien J Gurdon JB Genes Dev 2011 25 946 958 21536734 PMC3084028
  6. [6]Campellone KG Welch MD Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell 2010 11 237 251 PMC2929822 20237478
  7. [7]Taylor MD Sci. Transl. Med 2010 2 37ra44 PMC2943146 20574068
  8. [8]Wu X Nat. Cell Biol 2006 8 756 763 16767080
  9. [9]Ferrai C Mol. Biol. Cell 2009 20 3543 3551 19477923 PMC2719572
  10. [11]Fricke R Curr. Biol 2009 19 1429 1437 19716703
  11. [12]Ho HY Cell 2004 118 203 216 15260990
  12. [13]Miki H Suetsugu S Takenawa T EMBO J 1998 17 6932 6941 9843499 PMC1171041
  13. [14]Gurdon JB J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol 1968 20 401 414 5750105
  14. [15]Koche RP Cell Stem Cell 2011 8 96 105 21211784 PMC3220622
  15. [16]Hulstrand AM Schneider PN Houston DW Methods 2010 51 75 81 20045732 PMC2868083
  16. [17]Rawe VY Payne C Navara C Schatten G Dev. Biol 2004 276 253 267 15581863
  17. [18]Takenawa T Suetsugu S Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 2007 8 37 48 17183359
  18. [19]Yokoyama A Kitabayashi I Ayton PM Cleary ML Ohki M Blood 2002 100 3710 3718 12393701

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyamoto, K., Teperek, M., Yusa, K., Allen, G. E., Bradshaw, C. R., & Gurdon, J. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Miyamoto, Kei
  • Gurdon, J. B.
Venue
Science
Published
2013-08-30
Volume
341
Issue
6149
Pages
1002-1005
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2057429454
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (101050, 089613, 101050/Z/13/Z, WT077187, 092096, WT089613, 088333)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
WAVE1, Xenopus, RNA polymerase II, actin-binding proteins, nuclear actin, somatic cell nuclear transfer, embryonic development, gene activation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Nucleus, Female, Genes, Homeobox, Nuclear Proteins, Oocytes, RNA Polymerase II, Transcription, Genetic, Xenopus laevis, Transcriptional Activation, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Xenopus Proteins, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome Protein Family, Mice, Gene Knockdown Techniques, Cellular Reprogramming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review