Cited by 187Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

C57BL/6N Mutation in Cytoplasmic FMRP interacting protein 2 Regulates Cocaine Response

Open access
Kumar, Vivek, Kim, Kyungin, Joseph, Chryshanthi, Kourrich, Saïd, Yoo, Seung-Hee, Huang, Hung Chung, Vitaterna, Martha H., Pardo-Manuel de Villena, Fernando +3 more·2013·Science

Abstract

Not All Mice Are Equal: Different laboratories often use different strains of inbred animals, but one cannot make behavioral comparisons and assume that their reaction to interventions will necessarily be similar. Kumar et al. (p. 1508 ) have detected differences in cocaine response between the widely used C57BL/6N and C57BL/6J mouse strains and used quantitative trait locus analysis to identify a mutation in an inducible gene, Cyfip , that interacts with the Fragile X protein (FMRP) to regulate sensitivity and sensitization to cocaine through regulation of neuronal connectivity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1245503

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CYFIP2 is destabilized by the Ser968Phe mutation.

    “CYFIP2 is destabilized by the Ser968Phe mutation, and deletion of the allele in C57BL/6N mice results in acute and sensitized cocaine response phenotypes, suggesting that CYFIP2 is a critical regulator of the cocaine response171.”
  • Deletion of the Cyfip2 allele in C57BL/6N mice results in acute and sensitized cocaine response phenotypes.

    “CYFIP2 is destabilized by the Ser968Phe mutation, and deletion of the allele in C57BL/6N mice results in acute and sensitized cocaine response phenotypes, suggesting that CYFIP2 is a critical regulator of the cocaine response171.”
  • C57BL/6 mouse substrains have different locomotor activities and sensitized responses to cocaine and methamphetamine.

    “C57BL/6 mouse substrains have different locomotor activities and sensitized responses to cocaine and methamphetamine.”
  • Genetic screening of C57BL/6N mice, which have a low acute and sensitized response to psychostimulants compared with C57BL/6J mice, identified a Ser968Phe mutation in Cyfip2 as a causative variant.

    “Genetic screening of C57BL/6N mice, which have a low acute and sensitized response to psychostimulants compared with C57BL/6J mice, identified a Ser968Phe mutation in Cyfip2 as a causative variant171.”
  • CYFIP2 is a critical regulator of the cocaine response.

    “CYFIP2 is destabilized by the Ser968Phe mutation, and deletion of the allele in C57BL/6N mice results in acute and sensitized cocaine response phenotypes, suggesting that CYFIP2 is a critical regulator of the cocaine response171.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [1]Morse HC Origins of Inbred Mice 1979 Academic Press Inc
  2. [2]Pettitt SJ Nat Methods 2009 6 493 495 19525957 PMC3555078
  3. [3]Skarnes WC Nature 2011 474 337 342 21677750 PMC3572410
  4. [4]Waterston RH Nature 2002 420 520 562 12466850
  5. [5]Lein ES Nature 2007 445 168 176 17151600
  6. [6]Bryant CD J Neurogenet 2008 22 315 331 19085272 PMC3697827
  7. [7]Matsuo N Front Behav Neurosci 2010 4 29 20676234 PMC2912075
  8. [8]Koob GF Volkow ND Neuropsychopharmacology 2010 35 217 238 19710631 PMC2805560
  9. [9]Luscher C Malenka RC Neuron 2011 69 650 663 21338877 PMC4046255
  10. [10]Robinson TE Berridge KC Brain Res Brain Res Rev 1993 18 247 291 8401595
  11. [11]Nestler EJ Nat Rev Neurosci 2001 2 119 128 11252991
  12. [12]Cox A Genetics 2009 182 1335 1344 19535546 PMC2728870
  13. [13]Yang H Nat Genet 2011 43 648 655 21623374 PMC3125408
  14. [14]Keane TM Nature 2011 477 289 294 21921910 PMC3276836
  15. [15]Adzhubei IA Nat Methods 2010 7 248 249 20354512 PMC2855889
  16. [16]Chen Z Nature 2010 468 533 538 21107423 PMC3085272
  17. [17]Napoli I Cell 2008 134 1042 1054 18805096
  18. [18]Qurashi A Neural Dev 2007 2 18 17894861 PMC2098765
  19. [19]Schenck A Dev Biol 2004 274 260 270 15385157
  20. [20]Soderling SH J Neurosci 2007 27 355 365 17215396 PMC3740594
  21. [21]Soderling SH Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003 100 1723 1728 12578964 PMC149900
  22. [22]Kim Y Nature 2006 442 814 817 16862120
  23. [23]Bogdan S Grewe O Strunk M Mertens A Klambt C Development 2004 131 3981 3989 15269173

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kumar, V., Kim, K., Joseph, C., Kourrich, S., Yoo, S.-H., Huang, H. C., Vitaterna, M. H., Pardo-Manuel de Villena, F., Churchill, G., Bonci, A., & Takahashi, J. S.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
  • Jackson Laboratory (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Takahashi, Joseph S.
Venue
Science
Published
2013-12-20
Volume
342
Issue
6165
Pages
1508-1512
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2001644882
Cited by
187
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH061915)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (F32DA024556)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
CYFIP2, cocaine sensitization, protein destabilization, behavioral genetics, inbred mouse strains
MeSH terms
Central Nervous System Stimulants, Animals, Cocaine, Methamphetamine, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Motor Activity, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Phenylalanine, Psychomotor Performance, Serine, Mice, Knockout, Amino Acid Substitution, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Quantitative Trait Loci, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Mice, Drug-Seeking Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review