Cited by 1,580Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation.

Open access
Keane, Thomas M., Goodstadt, Leo, Danecek, Petr, White, Michael A., Wong, Kim, Yalcin, Binnaz, Heger, Andreas, Agam, Avigail +33 more·2011·Nature

Abstract

We report genome sequences of 17 inbred strains of laboratory mice and identify almost ten times more variants than previously known. We use these genomes to explore the phylogenetic history of the laboratory mouse and to examine the functional consequences of allele-specific variation on transcript abundance, revealing that at least 12% of transcripts show a significant tissue-specific expression bias. By identifying candidate functional variants at 718 quantitative trait loci we show that the molecular nature of functional variants and their position relative to genes vary according to the effect size of the locus. These sequences provide a starting point for a new era in the functional analysis of a key model organism. The laboratory mouse has become the workhorse of biomedical research. The draft sequence of the mouse reference genome was published in 2002, but some forms of variation are still poorly documented. Two papers in this issue go a long way towards filling the gaps. The generation and analysis of sequence from 17 key mouse genomes, including most of the commonly used inbred strains and their progenitors, reveal extensive genetic variation and provide insights into the molecular nature of functional variants as well as the phylogenetic history of the lab mouse. The data will be an important resource for a new era of functional analysis. The second paper describes the landscape of structural variants in the genomes of 13 classical and four wild-derived inbred mouse strains, mapping many of them to base-pair resolution. Despite their prevalence, structural variants are shown to have a relatively small impact on phenotypic variation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature10413

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Until now, most gene expression studies of different mouse strains have used the BL6 reference genome despite millions of known genetic variations between strains.

    “Until now, most gene expression studies of different mouse strains have used the BL6 reference genome despite millions of known genetic variations between strains.14,15”

    From High-quality mouse reference genomes reveal the structural complexity of the murine protein-coding landscape (2026) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Abstract identifies C57BL/6J as the mouse reference genome, and Data generation and variant discovery (page not provided) reports millions of variants across strains. Neither passage establishes that most gene-expression studies of different strains used that reference genome; the paper describes its own analysis, not the prevalence of that practice. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A requirement for N-masking is that SNP positions are known, for example via a public resource like the Mouse Genomes Project.

    “A requirement for N-masking is that SNP positions are known, e.g. via a public resource like the Mouse Genomes Project which provides high quality variant calls for a large number of mouse strains 8”
  • The DO founder strain genomes were assembled by alignment of short DNA sequence reads to the mouse reference genome as a first step in identifying SNPs, indels, and structural variants.

    “These genomes were assembled by alignment of short DNA sequence reads to the mouse reference genome as a first step in identifying SNPs, indels, and structural variants (Keane et al. 2011).”
  • Compared to previous de novo mouse strain genomes and variation catalogs, these long-read genome assemblies show significant improvement in the most complex regions, such as MHC, defensin, TCR, and Ly49 loci.

    “Compared to previous de novo mouse strain genomes and variation catalogs,14,15,18 these long-read genome assemblies show significant improvement in the most complex regions, such as MHC, defensin, T cell receptor (TCR), and Ly49 loci.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. [1]Paigen K One hundred years of mouse genetics: an intellectual history. II. The molecular revolution (1981-2002) Genetics 2003 163 1227 1235 12702670 PMC1462511
  2. [2]Paigen K One hundred years of mouse genetics: an intellectual history. I. The classical period (1902-1980) Genetics 2003 163 1 7 12586691 PMC1462407
  3. [3]Dietrich WF Genetic identification of Mom-1, a major modifier locus affecting Min-induced intestinal neoplasia in the mouse Cell 1993 75 631 639 8242739
  4. [4]Church DM Lineage-specific biology revealed by a finished genome assembly of the mouse PLoS Biol 2009 7 e1000112 19468303 PMC2680341
  5. [6]van der Weyden L Adams DJ Bradley A Tools for targeted manipulation of the mouse genome Physiol. Genomics 2002 11 133 164 12464689
  6. [7]Ringwald M The IKMC web portal: a central point of entry to data and resources from the International Knockout Mouse Consortium Nucleic Acids Res 2011 39 D849 D855 20929875 PMC3013768
  7. [8]Skarnes WC A conditional knockout resource for the genome-wide study of mouse gene function Nature 2011 474 337 342 21677750 PMC3572410
  8. [9]Frazer KA A sequence-based variation map of 8.27 million SNPs in inbred mouse strains Nature 2007 448 1050 1053 17660834
  9. [10]Quinlan AR Genome-wide mapping and assembly of structural variant breakpoints in the mouse genome Genome Res 2010 20 623 635 20308636 PMC2860164
  10. [11]Gale GD A genome-wide panel of congenic mice reveals widespread epistasis of behavior quantitative trait loci Mol. Psychiatry 2009 14 631 645 18379576 PMC3014058
  11. [12]Iakoubova OA Genome-tagged mice (GTM): two sets of genome-wide congenic strains Genomics 2001 74 89 104 11374905
  12. [13]Bennett BJ A high-resolution association mapping panel for the dissection of complex traits in mice Genome Res 2010 20 281 290 20054062 PMC2813484
  13. [14]Singer JB Genetic dissection of complex traits with chromosome substitution strains of mice Science 2004 304 445 448 15031436
  14. [15]Shao H Analyzing complex traits with congenic strains Mamm. Genome 2010 21 276 286 20524000 PMC3805105
  15. [16]Hunter KW Crawford NP The future of mouse QTL mapping to diagnose disease in mice in the age of whole-genome association studies Annu. Rev. Genet 2008 42 131 141 18759635
  16. [17]Rozmahe R Modulation of disease severity in cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator deficient mice by a secondary genetic factor Nature Genet 1996 12 280 287 8589719
  17. [18]Shao H Genetic architecture of complex traits: large phenotypic effects and pervasive epistasis Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2008 105 19910 19914 19066216 PMC2604967
  18. [19]Flint J Mackay TF Genetic architecture of quantitative traits in mice, flies, and humans Genome Res 2009 19 723 733 19411597 PMC3647534
  19. [21]Turner DJ Keane TM Sudbery I Adams DJ Next-generation sequencing of vertebrate experimental organisms Mamm. Genome 2009 20 327 338 19452216 PMC2714443
  20. [22]Guan C Ye C Yang X Gao J A review of current large-scale mouse knockout efforts Genesis 2010 48 73 85 20095055
  21. [23]Churchill GA The Collaborative Cross, a community resource for the genetic analysis of complex traits Nature Genet 2004 36 1133 1137 15514660
  22. [24]Valdar W Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice Nature Genet 2006 38 879 887 16832355
  23. [25]Davis RC A genome-wide set of congenic mouse strains derived from DBA/2J on a C57BL/6J background Genomics 2005 86 259 270 16039824
  24. [26]Steward CA Genome-wide end-sequenced BAC resources for the NOD/MrkTac and NOD/ShiLtJ mouse genomes Genomics 2010 95 105 110 19909804 PMC2824108
  25. [27]Sherry ST Ward M Sirotkin K dbSNP-database for single nucleotide polymorphisms and other classes of minor genetic variation Genome Res 1999 9 677 679 10447503
  26. [29]Deem A Break-induced replication is highly inaccurate PLoS Biol 2011 9 e1000594 21347245 PMC3039667
  27. [30]Mihola O Trachtulec Z Vlcek C Schimenti JC Forejt J A mouse speciation gene encodes a meiotic histone H3 methyltransferase Science 2009 323 373 375 19074312
  28. [31]McDonald JP 129-derived strains of mice are deficient in DNA polymerase iota and have normal immunoglobulin hypermutation J. Exp. Med 2003 198 635 643 12925679 PMC2194173
  29. [32]Koike H Arguello PA Kvajo M Karayiorgou M Gogos JA Disc1 is mutated in the 129S6/SvEv strain and modulates working memory in mice Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2006 103 3693 3697 16484369 PMC1450143
  30. [33]Lutzmann M Mechali M How to load a replicative helicase onto chromatin: a more and more complex matter during evolution Cell Cycle 2009 8 1309 1313 19342892
  31. [34]Mural RJ A comparison of whole-genome shotgun-derived mouse chromosome 16 and the human genome Science 2002 296 1661 1671 12040188
  32. [35]White MA Ane C Dewey CN Larget BR Payseur BA Fine-scale phylogenetic discordance across the house mouse genome PLoS Genet 2009 5 e1000729 19936022 PMC2770633
  33. [36]Pamilo P Nei M Li WH Accumulation of mutations in sexual and asexual populations Genet. Res 1987 49 135 146 3596234
  34. [37]Rosenberg NA The probability of topological concordance of gene trees and species trees Theor. Popul. Biol 2002 61 225 247 11969392
  35. [39]Slatkin M Pollack JL The concordance of gene trees and species trees at two linked loci Genetics 2006 172 1979 1984 16361238 PMC1456312
  36. [40]McDaniell R Heritable individual-specific and allele-specific chromatin signatures in humans Science 2010 328 235 239 20299549 PMC2929018
  37. [41]Huang DW Extracting biological meaning from large gene lists with DAVID Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics 2009 13 Unit 13.11 19728287
  38. [42]Solberg LC A protocol for high-throughput phenotyping, suitable for quantitative trait analysis in mice Mamm. Genome 2006 17 129 146 16465593
  39. [43]Yalcin B Flint J Mott R Using progenitor strain information to identify quantitative trait nucleotides in outbred mice Genetics 2005 171 673 681 16085706 PMC1456780
  40. [44]Mott R Talbot CJ Turri MG Collins AC Flint J A method for fine mapping quantitative trait loci in outbred animal stocks Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2000 97 12649 12654 11050180 PMC18818

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keane, T. M., Goodstadt, L., Danecek, P., White, M. A., Wong, K., Yalcin, B., Heger, A., Agam, A., Slater, G., Goodson, M., Furlotte, N. A., Eskin, E., Nellåker, C., Whitley, H., Cleak, J., Janowitz, D., Hernandez-Pliego, P., Edwards, A., Belgard, T. G., Oliver, P. L., McIntyre, R. E., Bhomra, A., Nicod, J., Gan, X., Yuan, W., van der Weyden, L., Steward, C. A., Bala, S., Stalker, J., Mott, R., Durbin, R., Jackson, I. J., Czechanski, A., Guerra-Assunção, J. A., Donahue, L. R., Reinholdt, L. G., Payseur, B. A., Ponting, C. P., Birney, E., Flint, J., & Adams, D. J.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • MRC Human Genetics Unit (GB)
  • Jackson Laboratory (US)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
Corresponding author
Adams, David J.
Venue
Nature
Published
2011-09
Volume
477
Issue
7364
Pages
289-294
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2005501593
Cited by
1,580
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 74 · 2024: 100 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 130 · 2020: 130 · 2019: 103 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 114 · 2016: 118 · 2015: 122 · 2014: 106 · 2013: 126 · 2012: 102
FWCI
69.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0918000)
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International
  • Wellcome Trust (079912, 085906/Z/08/Z, 083573, 077192, 082356, 090532, 083573/Z/07/Z, 085906, 083573/Z/07)
  • Immune Tolerance Network
  • Cancer Research UK (A6997)
  • National Institutes of Health (n01ai15416-28-0-11)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_EX_G0802457)
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F022697/1)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K25HL080079)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (T32HG002536)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (N01-AI-015416)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007359)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
inbred mouse strains, mRNA levels, quantitative trait loci, functional variants, structural variants, wild-derived mouse strains, phenotypic variability, gene expression regulation
MeSH terms
Alleles, Animals, Animals, Laboratory, Gene Expression Regulation, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Inbred Strains, Phenotype, Phylogeny, Genetic Variation, Genome, Genomics, Quantitative Trait Loci, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review