The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reversing defaunation: Restoring species in a changing world
Abstract
The rate of biodiversity loss is not slowing despite global commitments, and the depletion of animal species can reduce the stability of ecological communities. Despite this continued loss, some substantial progress in reversing defaunation is being achieved through the intentional movement of animals to restore populations. We review the full spectrum of conservation translocations, from reinforcement and reintroduction to controversial conservation introductions that seek to restore populations outside their indigenous range or to introduce ecological replacements for extinct forms. We place the popular, but misunderstood, concept of rewilding within this framework and consider the future role of new technical developments such as de-extinction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., Mace, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11148 · Cited by 7,457
Status and Ecological Effects of the World’s Largest Carnivores
Ripple, W. J., Estes, J. A., Beschta, R. L., Wilmers, C. C., Ritchie, E. G., Hebblewhite, M., Berger, J., Elmhagen, B., Letnic, M., Nelson, M. P., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1241484 · Cited by 3,667
Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services
Cadotte, M. W., Carscadden, K., & Mirotchnick, N. (2011) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x · Cited by 2,396
Functional Extinction of Birds Drives Rapid Evolutionary Changes in Seed Size
Galetti, M., Guevara, R., Côrtes, M. C., Fadini, R., Von Matter, S., Leite, A. B., Labecca, F., Ribeiro, T., Carvalho, C. S., Collevatti, R. G., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1233774 · Cited by 768
Cited by
Patterns, Causes, and Consequences of Anthropocene Defaunation
Young, H. S., McCauley, D. J., Galetti, M., & Dirzo, R. (2016) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054142 · Cited by 523
Invasive mammal eradication on islands results in substantial conservation gains
Jones, H. P., Holmes, N. D., Butchart, S. H. M., Tershy, B. R., Kappes, P. J., Corkery, I., Aguirre-Muñoz, A., Armstrong, D. P., Bonnaud, E., Burbidge, A. A., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1521179113 · Cited by 517
Self-citationThe inflated significance of neutral genetic diversity in conservation genetics
Teixeira, J. C., & Huber, C. D. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2015096118 · Cited by 474
Restoration, Reintroduction, and Rewilding in a Changing World
Corlett, R. T. (2016) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.017 · Cited by 420
Conservation translocations: a review of common difficulties and promising directions.
Berger‐Tal, O., Blumstein, D. T., & Swaisgood, R. R. (2020) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/acv.12534 · Cited by 415
Metadata
- Authors
- Seddon, P. J., Griffiths, C. J., Soorae, P. S., & Armstrong, D. P.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2014-07-25
- Volume
- 345
- Issue
- 6195
- Pages
- 406-412
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2165390707
- Cited by
- 700
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 41.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reversing defaunation: Restoring species in a changing world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1251818
- The paper
- Seddon, P. J., Griffiths, C. J., Soorae, P. S., & Armstrong, D. P. (2014). Reversing defaunation: Restoring species in a changing world. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251818
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
