Cited by 285Evolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyPlant Diversity and Evolution

Ancient DNA reveals elephant birds and kiwi are sister taxa and clarifies ratite bird evolution

Mitchell, Kieren J., Llamas, Bastien, Soubrier, Julien, Rawlence, Nicolas J., Worthy, Trevor H., Wood, Jamie, Lee, Michael S. Y., Cooper, Alan·2014·Science

Abstract

The evolution of the ratite birds has been widely attributed to vicariant speciation, driven by the Cretaceous breakup of the supercontinent Gondwana. The early isolation of Africa and Madagascar implies that the ostrich and extinct Madagascan elephant birds (Aepyornithidae) should be the oldest ratite lineages. We sequenced the mitochondrial genomes of two elephant birds and performed phylogenetic analyses, which revealed that these birds are the closest relatives of the New Zealand kiwi and are distant from the basal ratite lineage of ostriches. This unexpected result strongly contradicts continental vicariance and instead supports flighted dispersal in all major ratite lineages. We suggest that convergence toward gigantism and flightlessness was facilitated by early Tertiary expansion into the diurnal herbivory niche after the extinction of the dinosaurs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1251981

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent phylogenetic work supports the conclusion that the ratites are paraphyletic, implying convergent loss of flight in these lineages.

    “Recent phylogenetic work supports the conclusion that the ratites (including ostrich, emu, cassowaries, kiwis, rheas, and the extinct moas and elephant bird) are paraphyletic, implying convergent loss of flight in these lineages”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, K. J., Llamas, B., Soubrier, J., Rawlence, N. J., Worthy, T. H., Wood, J., Lee, M. S. Y., & Cooper, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ)
  • South Australian Museum (AU)
Corresponding author
Cooper, Alan
Venue
Science
Published
2014-05-23
Volume
344
Issue
6186
Pages
898-900
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1966758872
Cited by
285
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
FWCI
20.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
elephant birds, kiwi, ostrich, mitochondrial genome, phylogenetic relationships, Gondwana breakup, vicariance, gigantism, flightlessness, dinosaur extinction, Madagascar
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, DNA, Biological Evolution, Flight, Animal, Fossils, Molecular Sequence Data, New Zealand, Phylogeny, Struthioniformes, Palaeognathae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review