The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Solid Tumors
Abstract
Comparative genomic hybridization produces a map of DNA sequence copy number as a function of chromosomal location throughout the entire genome. Differentially labeled test DNA and normal reference DNA are hybridized simultaneously to normal chromosome spreads. The hybridization is detected with two different fluorochromes. Regions of gain or loss of DNA sequences, such as deletions, duplications, or amplifications, are seen as changes in the ratio of the intensities of the two fluorochromes along the target chromosomes. Analysis of tumor cell lines and primary bladder tumors identified 16 different regions of amplification, many in loci not previously known to be amplified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification
Dean, F. B., Hosono, S., Fang, L., Wu, X., Faruqi, A. F., Bray-Ward, P., Sun, Z., Zong, Q., Du, Y., Du, J., et al. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.082089499 · Cited by 1,467
In vivo amplification of the androgen receptor gene and progression of human prostate cancer
Visakorpi, T., Hyytinen, E., Koivisto, P., Tanner, M., Keinänen, R., Palmberg, C., Palotie, A., Tammela, T., Isola, J., & Kallioniemi, O.-P. (1995) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng0495-401 · Cited by 1,484
Self-citationCarcinoma-associated fibroblasts stimulate tumor progression of initiated human epithelium
Olumi, A., Grossfeld, G., Hayward, S., Carroll, P., Cunha, G., Hein, P., & Tlsty, T. (2000) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/bcr138 · Cited by 1,463
Autophagy suppresses tumor progression by limiting chromosomal instability
Mathew, R., Kongara, S., Beaudoin, B., Karp, C. M., Bray, K., Degenhardt, K., Chen, G., Jin, S., & White, E. (2007) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1545107 · Cited by 938
Chromosome aberrations in solid tumors
Albertson, D. G., Collins, C., McCormick, F., & Gray, J. W. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1215 · Cited by 812
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kallioniemi, A., Kallioniemi, O.-P., Sudar, D., Rutovitz, D., Gray, J. W., Waldman, F., & Pinkel, D.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1992-10-30
- Volume
- 258
- Issue
- 5083
- Pages
- 818-821
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1968046362
- Cited by
- 3,297
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Solid Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1359641
- The paper
- Kallioniemi, A., Kallioniemi, O.-P., Sudar, D., Rutovitz, D., Gray, J. W., Waldman, F., & Pinkel, D. (1992). Comparative Genomic Hybridization for Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of Solid Tumors. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1359641
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
