Cited by 50Plant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Parasitism and ResistancePlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies

Auxin and Kinetin Interaction in Apical Dominance

Davies, C. R., Seth, A. K., Wareing, P. F.·1966·Science

Abstract

The effects of auxin on the inhibition of lateral buds in decapitated bean plants are enhanced if kinetin is applied together with auxin. The uptake of 14 C-indoleacetic acid by the stumps of decapitated plants is increased in the presence of kinetin and leads to extensive transport of 14 C-indoleacetic acid in the stems. The increased bud inhibition resulting when auxin and kinetin are applied together may be due to greater amounts of auxin reaching the buds, but an alternative explanation is that metabolites are directed from the buds to the point of hormone application.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.151.3709.468

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shein and Jackson (1972) and Davies et al. (1966) found that kinetin applied alone to the cut stump of decapitated plants did not significantly alter bud outgrowth rate compared with controls.

    “Shein and Jackson (1972) and Davies et al. (1966) both found that kinetin applied alone to the cut stump of decapitated plants did not alter the rate of bud outgrowth signi®cantly compared with controls.”

    From The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in <i>Arabidopsis</i> (2000) · cites this paper as Davies et al. (1966)

  • Previous studies show that applying cytokinin together with auxin to the cut stem of decapitated plants can enhance auxin inhibition of lateral bud growth.

    “These results are consistent with previous studies showing that applying cytokinin together with auxin to the cut stem of decapitated plants can enhance auxin inhibition of lateral bud growth (Ali and Fletcher, 1971;Davies et al., 1966;Hillman, 1970;Phillips, 1969).”

    From The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in <i>Arabidopsis</i> (2000) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 1966

  • Evidence suggests that cytokinin applied to the cut stump or apical bud may strengthen auxin inhibition by enhancing IAA transport from the apex.

    “Evidence suggests that cytokinin applied to the cut stump or apical bud may strengthen auxin inhibition by enhancing IAA transport from the apex of plants (Davies et al., 1966;Li and Bangerth, 1992).”

    From The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in <i>Arabidopsis</i> (2000) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 1966

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davies, C. R., Seth, A. K., & Wareing, P. F.
Affiliations
Aberystwyth University (GB)
Venue
Science
Published
1966-01-28
Volume
151
Issue
3709
Pages
468-469
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1999109566
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Keywords
auxin, kinetin, apical dominance, decapitation, auxin transport, cytokinins, bean plants, plant hormones

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review