The hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in Arabidopsis
Open accessAbstract
Apically derived auxin has long been known to inhibit lateral bud growth, but since it appears not to enter the bud, it has been proposed that its inhibitory effect is mediated by a second messenger. Candidates include the plant hormones ethylene, cytokinin and abscisic acid. We have developed a new assay to study this phenomenon using the model plant Arabidopsis. The assay allows study of the effects of both apical and basal hormone applications on the growth of buds on excised nodal sections. We have shown that apical auxin can inhibit the growth of small buds, but larger buds were found to have lost competence to respond. We have used the assay with nodes from wild-type and hormone-signalling mutants to test the role of ethylene, cytokinin and abscisic acid in bud inhibition by apical auxin. Our data eliminate ethylene as a second messenger for auxin-mediated bud inhibition. Similarly, abscisic acid signalling is not to be required for auxin action, although basally applied abscisic can enhance inhibition by apical auxin and apically applied abscisic acid can reduce it. By contrast, basally applied cytokinin was found to release lateral buds from inhibition by apical auxin, while apically applied cytokinin dramatically increased the duration of inhibition. These results are consistent with cytokinin acting independently to regulate bud growth, rather than as a second messenger for auxin. However, in the absence of cytokinin-signalling mutants, a role for cytokinin as a second messenger for auxin cannot be ruled out.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
2 of 34 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Auxin levels in the bud increase as lateral buds begin to enlarge and grow.
“auxin levels in the bud actually increase as lateral buds begin to enlarge and grow (Gocal et al., 1991;Hillman, 1984;Pearce et al., 1995).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
Despite lower growth rates, inhibition by apical 1 mM NAA was clearly demonstrated with both etr1 and AVG treatments.
“However, despite the lower growth rates, inhibition by apical 1 mM NAA was clearly demonstrated with both etr1 and AVG treatments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1 mutant is ethylene-insensitive.
- Rests on an assumption: AVG inhibits ethylene biosynthesis.
- Findingown data
Apical NAA at 10 mM can inhibit outgrowth from longer buds up to 3.5 mm long at excision.
“NAA at this concentration (10 mM) could also inhibit outgrowth from longer buds, up to 3.5 mm long at excision (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When both hormones were applied basally, bud growth was similar to untreated controls.
“When both hormones were applied basally, bud growth was similar to that of untreated controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Basally applied ABA can enhance inhibition by apical auxin.
“although basally applied abscisic can enhance inhibition by apical auxin”
- Also stated in: § The effect of ethylene and ABA on auxin-mediated inhibition · plain
“Combining basal 3 mM ABA with apical 1 mM NAA increased the duration of inhibition signi®cantly compared with apical NAA alone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § The effect of ethylene and ABA on auxin-mediated inhibition · plain
- Findingown data
Simultaneous apical and basal 1 mM NAA increased mean duration of inhibition from 5 to 7-8 days compared with apical NAA alone.
“If 1 mM NAA was supplied both apically and basally simultaneously, the mean duration of inhibition, compared to apical NAA alone, was increased from 5 days to 7±8 days.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Basally applied cytokinin releases lateral buds from inhibition by apical auxin.
“basally applied cytokinin was found to release lateral buds from inhibition by apical auxin”
- Also stated in: § The effect of cytokinin · plain
“Basal 1 mM BA was found to release the inhibition of outgrowth by 1 mM apical auxin in most instances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § The effect of cytokinin · plain
- Findingown data
Buds exposed to combined apical NAA plus BA were more resistant to release by basal BA than buds exposed to apical NAA alone.
“Buds exposed to combined apical NAA plus BA were also more resistant to release by basal BA than buds exposed to apical NAA alone (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Dye supplied in the apical media block did not appear in the leaf or bud.
“However, dye supplied in the apical media block did not appear in the leaf or bud.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Simultaneous apical and basal 10 mM NAA completely inhibited all outgrowth for 14 days.
“NAA at a concentration of 10 mM supplied to both ends completely inhibited all outgrowth of the lateral shoots for the duration of the experiment (14 days).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Inhibition by apical NAA did not appear substantially different in abi1-1 or abi2-1 mutants compared with wild-type Landsberg erecta.
“Inhibition by apical NAA did not appear substantially different in either mutant compared with the wild-type (Landsberg erecta).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The abi1-1 and abi2-1 mutants are ABA-insensitive.
- Findingown data
The assay revealed a trend for decreasing sensitivity to inhibition by apical auxin as lateral bud size increases.
“The assay has also revealed a trend for decreasing sensitivity to inhibition by apical auxin as lateral bud size increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Apically applied ABA can reduce inhibition by apical auxin.
“apically applied abscisic acid can reduce it.”
- Also stated in: § The effect of ethylene and ABA on auxin-mediated inhibition · plain
“Conversely, supplying both 3 mM ABA and 1 mM NAA apically resulted in a shortened period of inhibition and rapid bud outgrowth thereafter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § The effect of ethylene and ABA on auxin-mediated inhibition · plain
- Findingown data
Basal NPA at 1 mM had no effect on inhibition by apical NAA.
“By contrast, basal 1 mM NPA had no effect on inhibition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Basal auxin alone did not affect bud outgrowth even at 10 mM.
“When any of the auxins were supplied in the basal medium alone, bud outgrowth did not differ from controls even when a 10 mM concentration was used (Figure 4a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
NPA alone, either basally or apically, had a slight inhibitory effect on bud growth.
“Application of NPA alone, either basally or apically, had a slight inhibitory effect on bud growth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Apically applied cytokinin dramatically increased the duration of inhibition by apical auxin.
“apically applied cytokinin dramatically increased the duration of inhibition.”
- Also stated in: § The effect of cytokinin · plain
“apical 1 mM NAA with 1 mM BA caused most buds to be inhibited for the duration of the experiment (10±14 days).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § The effect of cytokinin · plain
- Findingown data
In Landsberg, all combinations of ABA with apical 1 mM NAA resulted in much slower outgrowth than with apical 1 mM NAA alone.
“in contrast to Columbia, all combinations of ABA with apical 1 mM NAA resulted in much slower outgrowth than with apical 1 mM NAA alone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Our data show a direct relationship between the concentration of apical auxin and the duration of inhibition of bud outgrowth.
“Our data show a direct relationship between the concentration of apical auxin and the duration of the inhibition of bud outgrowth (Figure 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is significant bulk flow of solutes from the basal media block to the cauline leaf and later to the growing bud in the transpiration stream.
“By the addition of dyes, we have established that there is signi®cant bulk ¯ow of solutes from the basal media block to the cauline leaf and later to the growing bud in the transpiration stream (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Apical NAA at 1 mM inhibits lateral bud outgrowth for 4-7 days if the bud is no more than 1.5 mm at excision.
“The effect of auxin 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA, 1 mM) in the apical media block was found to inhibit lateral bud outgrowth for 4± 7 days if the bud was no more than 1.5 mm in length at excision (Figure 3a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Buds from the ABA-insensitive mutants abi1 and abi2 have a wild-type response to apical NAA in the assay.
“Buds from the ABA-insensitive mutants abi1 and abi2 have a wild-type response to apical NAA in the assay.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1, abi1, and abi2 mutants used are specific and effective in blocking ethylene action and ABA signalling, respectively, in the assayed buds.
- Findingown data
The data do not support a model in which auxin acts through ABA to inhibit bud growth.
“Our data do not support a model in which auxin acts through ABA to inhibit bud growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Inhibition of lateral buds by NAA in the apical media block is dose-dependent over 0.1-10 mM.
“Inhibition of lateral buds by NAA in the apical media block is dose-dependent (0.1±10 mM) (b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
- Findingown data
Apically derived auxin travelling in the polar transport stream inhibits the outgrowth of lateral buds.
“We have con®rmed previous studies demonstrating that apically derived auxin travelling in the polar transport stream inhibits the outgrowth of lateral buds.”
- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · plain
“Basipetal polar auxin transport is required for inhibition by apical auxin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · plain
- Findingown data
The data are not consistent with the hypothesis that inhibition by apical auxin is mediated wholly or partly by its influence on cytokinin export from roots, because auxin inhibits bud growth in the absence of roots.
“Our data are not consistent with this hypothesis because auxin is clearly able to inhibit bud growth in the absence of roots.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Application of ABA can significantly alter the duration and character of inhibition by apical auxin in a manner dependent upon the end of the nodal section to which it is applied.
“We have shown that application of ABA can signi®cantly alter the duration and character of inhibition by apical auxin in a manner dependent upon the end of the nodal section to which it is applied.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The hormone concentrations used in the assay (e.g., 1 mM NAA, 3 mM ABA) are within a physiological range and their effects reflect natural hormonal roles.
- Findingown data
In Landsberg, buds to which ABA and NAA had been supplied together apically grew out sooner than those where basal ABA or ABA on both sides was combined with apical NAA.
“However, as in Columbia, buds to which ABA and NAA had been supplied together apically grew out sooner than those where basal ABA or ABA on both sides was combined with apical NAA (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Buds longer than 1.5 mm at excision become unresponsive to inhibition by 1 mM NAA.
“Buds longer than 1.5 mm at excision become unresponsive to inhibition by 1 mM NAA (a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
- Findingown data
In the assay, apically applied cytokinin enhanced the effect of apical auxin.
“In our assay, apically applied cytokinin enhanced the effect of apical auxin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When combined with apical 1 mM NAA, ABA supplied to both sides has little effect on inhibition of lateral bud outgrowth.
“When combined with apical 1 mM NAA, the ABA enhances inhibition when supplied basally, reduces it when supplied apically, and has little effect when supplied to both sides (c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The hormone concentrations used in the assay (e.g., 1 mM NAA, 3 mM ABA) are within a physiological range and their effects reflect natural hormonal roles.
- Findingown data
Basal auxin does not inhibit lateral bud outgrowth.
“Basal auxin does not inhibit lateral bud outgrowth (a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
- Findingown data
We confirmed for Arabidopsis explants using 14C-IAA that the quantity of IAA transported to the bud from the cut apical surface did not exceed that reaching the bud from the basal end.
“We were able to con®rm this result for Arabidopsis explants using 14 C-IAA in our own assay (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Other auxins supplied apically also inhibit bud outgrowth.
“Other auxins supplied apically also inhibit bud outgrowth (c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
- Findingown data
A lower ABA concentration of 1.2 mM showed the same pattern except that the reduction in duration of auxin inhibition by apical ABA became less pronounced.
“Broadly the same pattern of bud outgrowth responses was seen when a lower ABA concentration of 1.2 mM was used, except that the reduction in the duration of auxin inhibition by apical ABA became less pronounced (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
abi1 buds did not respond to 3 mM ABA in any orientation, alone or in the presence of apical NAA.
“In addition, abi1 buds did not respond to 3 mM ABA in any orientation, alone or in the presence of apical NAA.”
- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · boosted
“Outgrowth of abi1-1 buds is completely insensitive to 3 mM ABA, and auxin inhibition is unaffected (d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1, abi1, and abi2 mutants used are specific and effective in blocking ethylene action and ABA signalling, respectively, in the assayed buds.
- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · boosted
- Findingown data
Increasing the basal BA:apical NAA ratio further reduced auxin inhibition of lateral buds in the assay.
“Consistent with this idea, we found that increasing the basal BA:apical NAA ratio further reduced auxin inhibition of lateral buds in the assay (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Ethylene biosynthesis and ethylene action are not required for inhibition of bud outgrowth by apical auxin.
“Our own data, from experiments with AVG and the etr1 mutant, demonstrate that ethylene biosynthesis and ethylene action, respectively, are not required for inhibition of bud outgrowth by apical auxin.”
- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · plain
“Ethylene biosynthesis and ethylene action are not required for auxin inhibition of lateral bud outgrowth; buds on the ethylene-insensitive mutant etr1 and Columbia nodal sections treated with aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) are inhibited by apical NAA (a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1, abi1, and abi2 mutants used are specific and effective in blocking ethylene action and ABA signalling, respectively, in the assayed buds.
- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · plain
- Findingown data
ABA alone at 3 mM has little effect on the rate of lateral bud outgrowth.
“ABA alone at a concentration of 3 mM has little effect on the rate of lateral bud outgrowth (c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The hormone concentrations used in the assay (e.g., 1 mM NAA, 3 mM ABA) are within a physiological range and their effects reflect natural hormonal roles.
- Findingown data
ABA at 3 mM on both sides and 1 mM NAA apically yielded a mean rate of bud growth midway between that observed for the basal and apical treatments.
“ABA at a concentration of 3 mM on both sides and 1 mM NAA apically yielded a mean rate of bud growth midway between that observed for the basal and apical treatments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Basipetal polar auxin transport is required for inhibition by apical auxin.
“Basipetal polar auxin transport is required for inhibition by apical auxin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
- Interpretationown data
ABA signalling is not required for auxin action.
“Similarly, abscisic acid signalling is not to be required for auxin action”
- Also stated in: § The effect of ethylene and ABA on auxin-mediated inhibition · hedged
“These ®ndings suggest that ABA is not acting as a secondary messenger for auxin inhibition of lateral bud outgrowth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The abi1-1 and abi2-1 mutants are ABA-insensitive.
- Also stated in: § The effect of ethylene and ABA on auxin-mediated inhibition · hedged
- Interpretationown data
Outgrowth of lateral buds from Arabidopsis can be inhibited by physiologically relevant concentrations of apical auxin.
“We have demonstrated that the outgrowth of lateral buds from Arabidopsis can be inhibited by physiologically relevant concentrations of apical auxin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Basipetal auxin transport from the apex is required for bud growth inhibition.
“This supports the conclusion reached by Tamas et al. (1989) that basipetal auxin transport from the apex is required for bud growth inhibition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tamas et al. (1989) source
- Interpretationown data
With increasing size, buds lose competence to respond to auxin.
“Therefore, it appears that, with increasing size, buds loose competence to respond to auxin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
There is no significant decrease in the potency of NAA in the split plates during the course of the experiment.
“We have established that there is no signi®cant decrease in the potency of the NAA in the split plates during the course of the experiment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Apically derived auxin inhibits lateral bud growth.
“Apically derived auxin has long been known to inhibit lateral bud growth”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
“These data strongly support the hypothesis that apically derived auxin is transported basipetally and inhibits the outgrowth of lateral buds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
- Interpretationown data
The difference in effects of basally and apically supplied auxin is not explained by a difference in the quantity of hormone reaching the bud.
“The difference in the effects of basally and apically supplied auxin is not explained by a difference in the quantity of hormone reaching the bud.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Polar auxin transport is required for inhibition by apical auxin.
“This indicates that polar auxin transport is required for inhibition by apical auxin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
A role for cytokinin as a second messenger for auxin cannot be ruled out in the absence of cytokinin-signalling mutants.
“However, in the absence of cytokinin-signalling mutants, a role for cytokinin as a second messenger for auxin cannot be ruled out.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Cytokinin acts independently to regulate bud growth, rather than as a second messenger for auxin.
“These results are consistent with cytokinin acting independently to regulate bud growth, rather than as a second messenger for auxin.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Wickson and Thimann (1958) found that kinetin alone did not markedly promote growth of lateral buds in Pisum stem sections.
“Similarly, Wickson and Thimann (1958) found that kinetin alone did not have a marked growth-promoting effect on the lateral buds of Pisum stem sections.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wickson and Thimann (1958) source
- Interpretationown data
The data favour models in which ethylene, ABA, and cytokinin act independently to regulate bud activity.
“Rather they favour models in which these hormones are acting independently to regulate bud activity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1, abi1, and abi2 mutants used are specific and effective in blocking ethylene action and ABA signalling, respectively, in the assayed buds.
- Rests on an assumption: The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
- Rests on an assumption: The hormone concentrations used in the assay (e.g., 1 mM NAA, 3 mM ABA) are within a physiological range and their effects reflect natural hormonal roles.
- Interpretationreasoning
The second messenger relaying the auxin signal into the bud is, with the possible exception of cytokinin, unlikely to be any of the hormonal candidates.
“Thus, it appears that the second messenger relaying the auxin signal into the bud is, with the possible exception of cytokinin, unlikely to be any of the hormonal candidates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1, abi1, and abi2 mutants used are specific and effective in blocking ethylene action and ABA signalling, respectively, in the assayed buds.
- Rests on an assumption: The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
- Rests on an assumption: The hormone concentrations used in the assay (e.g., 1 mM NAA, 3 mM ABA) are within a physiological range and their effects reflect natural hormonal roles.
- Premisecitation
Across many species, a reduction in ABA levels within buds positively correlates with release of buds from dormancy.
“There is a positive correlation between a reduction in ABA levels within buds of many species and the release of those buds from dormancy (Galoch et al., 1998;LeBris et al., 1999;Pearce et al., 1995;Piola et al., 1998;reviewed by Cline, 1991).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
The quantity of IAA transported to the bud from the cut apical surface of explants did not exceed that reaching the bud from the basal end.
“In addition, Lim and Tamas (1989) used 14 C-IAA to show that the quantity of IAA transported to the bud from the cut apical surface of explants did not exceed that reaching the bud from the basal end.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lim and Tamas (1989) source
- Interpretationown data
The data are consistent with an independent role for ABA in regulating bud growth.
“Our data are consistent with an independent role for ABA in regulating bud growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1, abi1, and abi2 mutants used are specific and effective in blocking ethylene action and ABA signalling, respectively, in the assayed buds.
- Rests on an assumption: The hormone concentrations used in the assay (e.g., 1 mM NAA, 3 mM ABA) are within a physiological range and their effects reflect natural hormonal roles.
- Premisecitation
Recent research does not support the hypothesis that auxin acts via ethylene in the control of apical dominance.
“The hypothesis that auxin might act via ethylene in the control of apical dominance (Blake et al., 1983;Burg and Burg, 1968;Russel and Thimann, 1988) is not supported by recent research (Cline, 1991;Li and Bangerth, 1992;Romano et al., 1993).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationown data
ABA signalling appears not to be required for auxin to inhibit bud growth.
“Therefore, ABA signalling appears not to be required for auxin to inhibit bud growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1, abi1, and abi2 mutants used are specific and effective in blocking ethylene action and ABA signalling, respectively, in the assayed buds.
- Premisecitation
Previously, workers using decapitated Arabidopsis plants have been unable to restore apical dominance using exogenous auxin treatments.
“Previously, workers using decapitated Arabidopsis plants have been unable to restore apical dominance using exogenous auxin treatments (Cline, 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cline, 1996 source
- Interpretationown data
The data are less supportive of models in which ethylene, ABA, or cytokinin act directly downstream of auxin in regulating branching.
“In general, our data are less supportive of models in which ethylene, ABA or cytokinin act directly downstream of auxin in regulating branching.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1, abi1, and abi2 mutants used are specific and effective in blocking ethylene action and ABA signalling, respectively, in the assayed buds.
- Rests on an assumption: The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
- Rests on an assumption: The hormone concentrations used in the assay (e.g., 1 mM NAA, 3 mM ABA) are within a physiological range and their effects reflect natural hormonal roles.
- Premisecitation
Previous studies show that applying cytokinin together with auxin to the cut stem of decapitated plants can enhance auxin inhibition of lateral bud growth.
“These results are consistent with previous studies showing that applying cytokinin together with auxin to the cut stem of decapitated plants can enhance auxin inhibition of lateral bud growth (Ali and Fletcher, 1971;Davies et al., 1966;Hillman, 1970;Phillips, 1969).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
Shein and Jackson (1972) and Davies et al. (1966) found that kinetin applied alone to the cut stump of decapitated plants did not significantly alter bud outgrowth rate compared with controls.
“Shein and Jackson (1972) and Davies et al. (1966) both found that kinetin applied alone to the cut stump of decapitated plants did not alter the rate of bud outgrowth signi®cantly compared with controls.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Evidence suggests that cytokinin applied to the cut stump or apical bud may strengthen auxin inhibition by enhancing IAA transport from the apex.
“Evidence suggests that cytokinin applied to the cut stump or apical bud may strengthen auxin inhibition by enhancing IAA transport from the apex of plants (Davies et al., 1966;Li and Bangerth, 1992).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
Ethylene does not act as a second messenger for auxin in correlative inhibition of bud outgrowth.
“We therefore conclude that ethylene does not act as a second messenger for auxin in correlative inhibition of bud outgrowth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1, abi1, and abi2 mutants used are specific and effective in blocking ethylene action and ABA signalling, respectively, in the assayed buds.
- May combine two claims. 33
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAuxin levels increase as buds begin to grow, and bud activity correlates with the presence of active polar auxin transport.
“Certainly, auxin levels increase as buds begin to grow (Gocal et al., 1991;Hillman, 1984;Pearce et al., 1995), and bud activity correlates with the presence of active polar auxin transport (Morris and Johnson, 1990;Morris, 1977).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSome larger buds (2-5 mm) unresponsive to 1 mM NAA can be inhibited by higher concentrations of apical NAA, but even 10 mM NAA may not inhibit buds longer than 5 mm.
“We have found that some of the larger buds (2± 5 mm), which appear unresponsive to 1 mM NAA, can be inhibited by higher concentrations of apical NAA, but that even 10 mM NAA may not inhibit buds longer than 5 mm (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen NAA was supplied basally and BA apically, mean rate of lateral outgrowth was the same as controls for the first 120 h, after which buds tended to die.
“When the orientation of the hormones was reversed, i.e.NAA basally and BA apically, the mean rate of lateral outgrowth was the same as the controls for the ®rst 120 h, after which the buds from this treatment tended to die.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBasal 1 mM BA caused a slight increase in the rate of lateral growth; buds were on average one-third longer than controls after 72 h.
“Basal 1 mM BA caused a slight increase in the rate of lateral growth, such that buds were on average one-third longer than controls after 72 h.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataabi1-1 buds were completely insensitive to ABA in any orientation and auxin inhibition was unaffected.
“When abi1-1 was tested, it was found that the buds were completely insensitive to ABA in any orientation and auxin inhibition was unaffected (Figure 5d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The abi1-1 and abi2-1 mutants are ABA-insensitive.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataInhibition by apical 1 mM NAA was more prolonged when combined with AVG (24 h longer on average) or etr1 (5-6 days longer).
“In fact, inhibition by apical 1 mM NAA was more prolonged when combined with either AVG or etr1 in the assay (24 h longer, on average, with AVG and 5±6 days longer with etr1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1 mutant is ethylene-insensitive.
- Rests on an assumption: AVG inhibits ethylene biosynthesis.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataApical NAA at 10 mM inhibits most buds for at least 7 days and many for 10-14 days.
“Concentrations of apical NAA higher than 1 mM prolonged the period of inhibition, with 10 mM inhibiting most buds for at least 7 days and many for the duration of the experiment: 10±14 days (Figure 3b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBuds larger than 1.5 mm at excision are increasingly less likely to be inhibited by 1 mM apical NAA; most buds greater than 3 mm grow out at rates not significantly different from controls.
“Buds larger than 1.5 mm at excision of the nodal section were increasingly less likely to be inhibited by 1 mM NAA for any period, and most lateral buds greater than 3 mm in length grew out at rates not signi®cantly different from control buds.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataApical 2,4-D completely inhibited buds for 2-10 days and when growth began it proceeded at a greatly reduced rate.
“By contrast, when apical 2,4-D was used, the buds were completely inhibited for 2± 10 days and when growth began it proceeded at a greatly reduced rate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataLandsberg erecta appeared generally more sensitive to ABA than Columbia; 3 mM ABA in any orientation dramatically reduced bud outgrowth.
“It was found that Landsberg erecta appeared generally more sensitive to ABA than Columbia.In Landsberg, the rate of bud outgrowth was dramatically reduced (and to approximately the same degree) by 3 mM ABA in any orientation”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataApical NPA prevents or partially relieves inhibition of bud outgrowth by apical NAA.
“When the polar transport inhibitor 1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) was supplied apically (1 mM), inhibition by 1 mM apical NAA was partially relieved (Figure 4b).”
- Also stated in: § Auxin and bud outgrowth Our data show a direct relationship between the concentration of apical auxin and the duration of the inhibition of bud outgrowth (Figure 3).Other workers have found that increasing the concentration of auxin applied to the cut stump of decapitated plants (Thimann, 1937;Went, 1939), or to the apical end of explants (Tamas et al., 1989), decreases the ®nal length of lateral buds.Wickson and Thimann (1958) observed that buds on nodal sections of Pisum sativum immersed in nutrient solutions were inhibited for approximately the same period over a range of IAA concentrations.The buds would `breakaway' after 5 days, but their subsequent growth was slower at higher IAA concentrations.In contrast, we have found that, when apical NAA is applied, the time to breakaway increases as the concentration is raised from 0.1 to 10 mM, often with little difference in the subsequent rate of outgrowth (Figure 3b).The mechanism behind this concentrationdependent timing of breakaway is unclear.A decline in the sensitivity of some auxin-responsive tissues may occur, or the ability of the nodal sections to take up and/or transport auxin may diminish with time and the build-up of callus at the cut stump.Perhaps a substance accumulates that counteracts inhibition by auxin.For instance, cells at the base of the nodal sections that have begun to differentiate into root tissue may begin to synthesize and release cytokinins.We have established that there is no signi®cant decrease in the potency of the NAA in the split plates during the course of the experiment.Plates used in the assay for 8 days were replenished with fresh nodal sections and were found to inhibit bud outgrowth for as long as fresh plates (data not shown). The assay has also revealed a trend for decreasing sensitivity to inhibition by apical auxin as lateral bud size increases.We have found that some of the larger buds (2± 5 mm), which appear unresponsive to 1 mM NAA, can be inhibited by higher concentrations of apical NAA, but that even 10 mM NAA may not inhibit buds longer than 5 mm (data not shown).Therefore, it appears that, with increasing size, buds loose competence to respond to auxin.The molecular basis for this change is unknown.One possibility is that the transition to auxin resistance corresponds to the establishment of auxin synthesis and transport in the developing bud as suggested by Snow (1937).Certainly, auxin levels increase as buds begin to grow (Gocal et al., 1991;Hillman, 1984;Pearce et al., 1995), and bud activity correlates with the presence of active polar auxin transport (Morris and Johnson, 1990;Morris, 1977). Supplying apical NPA prevented inhibition by apical NAA.This supports the conclusion reached by Tamas et al. (1989) that basipetal auxin transport from the apex is required for bud growth inhibition.In addition, our observation that basally supplied auxins failed to inhibit lateral bud outgrowth is in agreement with their ®ndings.However, they also found that supplying basal IAA to bean nodal explants could relieve inhibition by apical IAA, which is contrary to our results using NAA.This may re¯ect a difference in the action of these speci®c auxins (e.g.uptake into cells), or in the responses of the two species to basal auxin.The difference in the effects of basally and apically supplied auxin is not explained by a difference in the quantity of hormone reaching the bud.By the addition of dyes, we have established that there is signi®cant bulk ¯ow of solutes from the basal media block to the cauline leaf and later to the growing bud in the transpiration stream (data not shown).However, dye supplied in the apical media block did not appear in the leaf or bud.In addition, Lim and Tamas (1989) used 14 C-IAA to show that the quantity of IAA transported to the bud from the cut apical surface of explants did not exceed that reaching the bud from the basal end.We were able to con®rm this result for Arabidopsis explants using 14 C-IAA in our own assay (data not shown). · plain
“Supplying apical NPA prevented inhibition by apical NAA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Auxin and bud outgrowth Our data show a direct relationship between the concentration of apical auxin and the duration of the inhibition of bud outgrowth (Figure 3).Other workers have found that increasing the concentration of auxin applied to the cut stump of decapitated plants (Thimann, 1937;Went, 1939), or to the apical end of explants (Tamas et al., 1989), decreases the ®nal length of lateral buds.Wickson and Thimann (1958) observed that buds on nodal sections of Pisum sativum immersed in nutrient solutions were inhibited for approximately the same period over a range of IAA concentrations.The buds would `breakaway' after 5 days, but their subsequent growth was slower at higher IAA concentrations.In contrast, we have found that, when apical NAA is applied, the time to breakaway increases as the concentration is raised from 0.1 to 10 mM, often with little difference in the subsequent rate of outgrowth (Figure 3b).The mechanism behind this concentrationdependent timing of breakaway is unclear.A decline in the sensitivity of some auxin-responsive tissues may occur, or the ability of the nodal sections to take up and/or transport auxin may diminish with time and the build-up of callus at the cut stump.Perhaps a substance accumulates that counteracts inhibition by auxin.For instance, cells at the base of the nodal sections that have begun to differentiate into root tissue may begin to synthesize and release cytokinins.We have established that there is no signi®cant decrease in the potency of the NAA in the split plates during the course of the experiment.Plates used in the assay for 8 days were replenished with fresh nodal sections and were found to inhibit bud outgrowth for as long as fresh plates (data not shown). The assay has also revealed a trend for decreasing sensitivity to inhibition by apical auxin as lateral bud size increases.We have found that some of the larger buds (2± 5 mm), which appear unresponsive to 1 mM NAA, can be inhibited by higher concentrations of apical NAA, but that even 10 mM NAA may not inhibit buds longer than 5 mm (data not shown).Therefore, it appears that, with increasing size, buds loose competence to respond to auxin.The molecular basis for this change is unknown.One possibility is that the transition to auxin resistance corresponds to the establishment of auxin synthesis and transport in the developing bud as suggested by Snow (1937).Certainly, auxin levels increase as buds begin to grow (Gocal et al., 1991;Hillman, 1984;Pearce et al., 1995), and bud activity correlates with the presence of active polar auxin transport (Morris and Johnson, 1990;Morris, 1977). Supplying apical NPA prevented inhibition by apical NAA.This supports the conclusion reached by Tamas et al. (1989) that basipetal auxin transport from the apex is required for bud growth inhibition.In addition, our observation that basally supplied auxins failed to inhibit lateral bud outgrowth is in agreement with their ®ndings.However, they also found that supplying basal IAA to bean nodal explants could relieve inhibition by apical IAA, which is contrary to our results using NAA.This may re¯ect a difference in the action of these speci®c auxins (e.g.uptake into cells), or in the responses of the two species to basal auxin.The difference in the effects of basally and apically supplied auxin is not explained by a difference in the quantity of hormone reaching the bud.By the addition of dyes, we have established that there is signi®cant bulk ¯ow of solutes from the basal media block to the cauline leaf and later to the growing bud in the transpiration stream (data not shown).However, dye supplied in the apical media block did not appear in the leaf or bud.In addition, Lim and Tamas (1989) used 14 C-IAA to show that the quantity of IAA transported to the bud from the cut apical surface of explants did not exceed that reaching the bud from the basal end.We were able to con®rm this result for Arabidopsis explants using 14 C-IAA in our own assay (data not shown). · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBasal and apical 3 mM ABA did not affect the rate of bud outgrowth significantly in Columbia, but when supplied in both media blocks a slight reduction was observed.
“Basal and apical 3 mM ABA did not affect the rate of bud outgrowth signi®cantly, but, when supplied in both media blocks, a slight reduction in growth rate was observed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe rate of lateral outgrowth in the etr1 mutant was slower than in wild-type, and 5 mM AVG reduced the rate of bud growth substantially.
“The rate of lateral outgrowth in the etr1 mutant was slower than in wild-type, and 5 mM AVG, supplied in both media blocks, also reduced the rate of bud growth substantially.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1 mutant is ethylene-insensitive.
- Rests on an assumption: AVG inhibits ethylene biosynthesis.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataApical NAA at 0.5 mM inhibits outgrowth of many buds but usually for a shorter period than 1 mM; 0.1 mM does not affect the rate of bud growth.
“Apical 0.5 mM NAA inhibited the outgrowth of many buds, but usually for a shorter period than 1 mM NAA, and apical 0.1 mM NAA did not affect the rate of bud growth (Figure 3b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn inverted nodes, NAA at the inverted apical end inhibited outgrowth, but basal NAA had no effect.
“Even with the orientation of the nodes reversed, NAA supplied at the inverted apical end was found to inhibit outgrowth, but still had no effect when provided at the basal end (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataApical cytokinin and cytokinin applied to both sides had little effect on bud growth.
“Apical cytokinin and cytokinin applied to both sides had little effect.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataApical IAA at 1 mM prevented outgrowth for 2-4 days and was similar in effect to 0.5 mM NAA.
“IAA at a concentration of 1 mM prevented outgrowth for 2±4 days and was similar in effect to 0.5 mM NAA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataApical IAA and 2,4-D also inhibit bud outgrowth; IAA is less potent than NAA.
“The most prevalent natural auxin, IAA, and the synthetic auxin 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) supplied apically were also able to inhibit bud outgrowth (Figure 3c).Apical IAA was found to be a less potent inhibitor than NAA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWhen apical NAA is applied, time to breakaway increases as the concentration is raised from 0.1 to 10 mM, often with little difference in subsequent rate of outgrowth.
“In contrast, we have found that, when apical NAA is applied, the time to breakaway increases as the concentration is raised from 0.1 to 10 mM, often with little difference in the subsequent rate of outgrowth (Figure 3b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGrowth of lateral shoots from excised node 1 was slow for the first 24 h (0-1 mm), then increased to an average of 7 mm per day between 72 and 144 h.
“Growth of lateral shoots from excised node 1 was slow for the ®rst 24 h (0±1 mm).The growth rate then increased steadily to settle at an average of 7 mm per day between 72 and 144 h (Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataApical NPA can release auxin inhibition of bud outgrowth, but basal NPA cannot.
“Apical NPA can release auxin inhibition of bud outgrowth, but basal NPA cannot (b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the assay, the cytokinin BA applied basally, apically, or both had relatively little effect on lateral bud outgrowth, although 1 mM BA applied basally slightly stimulated growth rate.
“The cytokinin BA, when applied basally, apically or both, had relatively little effect on the outgrowth of the lateral buds in the assay, although a small stimulation of the rate of growth was seen when 1 mM BA was added basally.”
- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · hedged
“When supplied alone, BA generally has little effect on the rate of bud outgrowth (a), but when supplied basally or apically with apical NAA, BA can, respectively, release or enhance inhibition of lateral bud outgrowth (b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · hedged
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataSmall buds are more sensitive to apical auxin than large buds, which become essentially unresponsive to the hormone.
“Small buds are more sensitive to apical auxin than large buds, which become essentially unresponsive to the hormone.”
- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · plain
“Buds longer than 1.5 mm at excision become unresponsive to inhibition by 1 mM NAA (a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataApical ABA reduces auxin-mediated inhibition, whereas basal ABA enhances it.
“Apical ABA can reduce auxinmediated inhibition, whilst basal ABA enhances it.”
- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · plain
“When combined with apical 1 mM NAA, the ABA enhances inhibition when supplied basally, reduces it when supplied apically, and has little effect when supplied to both sides (c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The hormone concentrations used in the assay (e.g., 1 mM NAA, 3 mM ABA) are within a physiological range and their effects reflect natural hormonal roles.
- Also stated in: § Set-up and measurements · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataBuds on nodal sections from the Landsberg erecta ecotype grew out more slowly than those of Columbia, reducing the difference between auxin-treated and control buds.
“It was also noted that buds on nodal sections from the Landsberg erecta ecotype grew out more slowly than those of Columbia, and hence the difference between auxin-treated and control buds is reduced.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe growth curve for lateral buds from node 1 on intact Columbia plants was more linear; growth was significantly slower, attaining only 3.5 mm per day after 120 h.
“The growth curve for lateral buds from node 1 on intact Columbia plants grown in sterile culture, under the same light and temperature regimes, was more linear than for the excised nodes (Figure 2).Initially growth rates were similar, but although the growth rate of lateral shoots on excised nodes accelerated after 72 h, the comparative growth of lateral shoots on intact plants was signi®cantly Sl”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe assay allows study of the effects of both apical and basal hormone applications on the growth of buds on excised nodal sections.
“The assay allows study of the effects of both apical and basal hormone applications on the growth of buds on excised nodal sections.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataEthylene biosynthesis and ethylene action do not mediate auxin inhibition of lateral bud growth.
“Our data eliminate ethylene as a second messenger for auxin-mediated bud inhibition.”
- Also stated in: § The effect of ethylene and ABA on auxin-mediated inhibition · plain
“Hence ethylene biosynthesis and ethylene action do not mediate auxin inhibition of lateral bud growth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The etr1 mutant is ethylene-insensitive.
- Rests on an assumption: AVG inhibits ethylene biosynthesis.
- Also stated in: § The effect of ethylene and ABA on auxin-mediated inhibition · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationApical auxin influences the export of cytokinins from roots.
“The export of cytokinins from roots has been shown to be in¯uenced by apical auxin, and this has led to the hypothesis that inhibition by apical auxin is mediated wholly or partly by its in¯uence on cytokinin export from the roots (Bangerth, 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bangerth, 1994 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBuds on nodal sections of Pisum sativum immersed in nutrient solutions were inhibited for approximately the same period over a range of IAA concentrations; they broke away after 5 days, but subsequent growth was slower at higher IAA concentrations.
“Wickson and Thimann (1958) observed that buds on nodal sections of Pisum sativum immersed in nutrient solutions were inhibited for approximately the same period over a range of IAA concentrations.The buds would `breakaway' after 5 days, but their subsequent growth was slower at higher IAA concentrations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wickson and Thimann (1958) source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe assay allows various combinations of plant hormones and/or phytotropins and/or metabolic inhibitors to be supplied to each side of the node separately.
“The assay we have developed allows various combinations of plant hormones and/or phytotropins and/or metabolic inhibitors to be supplied to each side of the node separately.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIncreasing the concentration of auxin applied to the cut stump of decapitated plants or to the apical end of explants decreases the final length of lateral buds.
“Other workers have found that increasing the concentration of auxin applied to the cut stump of decapitated plants (Thimann, 1937;Went, 1939), or to the apical end of explants (Tamas et al., 1989), decreases the ®nal length of lateral buds.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationKinetin enhances the movement of 32P and 14C-sucrose towards the cut stump to which IAA has been applied.
“Kinetin has also been found to enhance the movement of 32 P and 14 C-sucrose towards the cut stump to which IAA has been applied (Seth and Wareing, 1964).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Seth and Wareing, 1964 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn plants, roots are believed to be the major site of cytokinin synthesis and export cytokinins to the shoot via the xylem.
“In plants, the roots are believed to be the major site of cytokinin synthesis (Chen et al., 1985), and to export these substances to the shoot via the xylem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 1985 source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Arabidopsis era1 mutant has enhanced ABA response and reduced branching, providing evidence for a role for ABA in regulating bud growth.
“Further evidence for a role for ABA in regulating bud growth comes from analysis of the era1 mutant of Arabidopsis which has an enhanced response to ABA and reduced branching (Pei et al., 1998).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pei et al., 1998 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenIndividuals were excluded from the data set if the growing bud had touched the medium, if the cut end of the internode had been pushed out of the medium by elongation of the stem, if condensation may have bridged the gap between the two media blocks, or where microbial contamination was visible on the plate.
“Individuals were excluded from the data set if the growing bud had touched the medium, if the cut end of the internode had been pushed out of the medium by elongation of the stem, if condensation may have bridged the gap between the two media blocks, or where microbial contamination was visible on the plate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningAll data displayed in the paper represent the growth responses of lateral buds from node 1.
“All of the data displayed in this paper represent the growth responses of lateral buds from node 1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe trough between the two media blocks was checked carefully for any bridges and dried to prevent cross-contamination.
“This trough was checked carefully for any bridges between the two media blocks and dried in the laminar ¯ow hood, parallel to the air¯ow, for a further 30 min.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCytokinins stimulate bud outgrowth when applied to lateral buds of plants with an intact apex, or to decapitated plants treated with inhibitory concentrations of apical auxin.
“Cytokinins have been shown to stimulate bud outgrowth when applied to the lateral buds of plants with an intact apex, or to decapitated plants to which inhibitory concentrations of apical auxin were applied (Mok, 1994).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mok, 1994
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe plates were left at 4°C for at least 72 h to allow the hormone to diffuse evenly throughout the media.
“The plates were then left at 4°C for at least 72 h to allow the hormone to diffuse evenly throughout the media.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The etr1 mutant is ethylene-insensitive.
“the ethylene-insensitive mutant etr1”
The paper relies on this without support.
The abi1-1 and abi2-1 mutants are ABA-insensitive.
“the ABA-insensitive mutants abi1-1 and abi2-1”
The paper relies on this without support.
AVG inhibits ethylene biosynthesis.
“the ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor, aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The etr1, abi1, and abi2 mutants used are specific and effective in blocking ethylene action and ABA signalling, respectively, in the assayed buds.
“Our own data, from experiments with AVG and the etr1 mutant, demonstrate that ethylene biosynthesis and ethylene action, respectively, are not required for inhibition of bud outgrowth by apical auxin.”
“Buds from the ABA-insensitive mutants abi1 and abi2 have a wild-type response to apical NAA in the assay.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The excised nodal section assay reproduces the hormonal regulation of axillary bud growth in intact Arabidopsis plants.
“The assay that we have developed, combined with the wide range of Arabidopsis mutants available, is proving a valuable method for investigating the roles of different hormones in the inhibition and outgrowth of lateral buds in Arabidopsis.”
“A comparison of the rates of lateral bud outgrowth from the lowest node of intact Arabidopsis plants (Columbia ecotype) and from the same node on excised untreated sections.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The hormone concentrations used in the assay (e.g., 1 mM NAA, 3 mM ABA) are within a physiological range and their effects reflect natural hormonal roles.
“However, it is also possible that one or more of the observed responses to ABA may be non-physiological, due perhaps to the concentration of the mixed isomers used and/or contact with ectopic tissues.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
NPA is described as both partly and fully reversing inhibition
MinorThe results say apical NPA only partially relieved inhibition by apical NAA, whereas the discussion says it prevented that inhibition.
“When the polar transport inhibitor 1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA) was supplied apically (1 mM), inhibition by 1 mM apical NAA was partially relieved (Figure 4b).”
“Supplying apical NPA prevented inhibition by apical NAA.”
Cites
Growth and development of the axr1 mutants of Arabidopsis.
Lincoln, C., Britton, J. H., & Estelle, M. (1990) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.2.11.1071 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
(1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 615 · see citing works
A dominant mutation inArabidopsis confers resistance to auxin, ethylene and abscisic acid
Wilson, A. K., Pickett, F. B., Turner, J. C., & Estelle, M. A. (1990) · Molecular and General Genetics MGG · doi:10.1007/bf00633843 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
Role of Farnesyltransferase in ABA Regulation of Guard Cell Anion Channels and Plant Water Loss
Pei, Z.-M., Ghassemian, M., Kwak, C. M., McCourt, P., & Schroeder, J. I. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5387.287 · Cited by 390 · see citing works
Thimann, K. V., & Skoog, F. (1933) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.19.7.714 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
Cline, M. G. (1991) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858771 · Cited by 380 · see citing works
The Antagonism of Auxin and Kinetin in Apical Dominance
Wickson, M., & Thimann, K. V. (1958) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1958.tb08426.x · Cited by 363 · see citing works
(1987) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1.1.86 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
ON THE NATURE OF INHIBITIONS CAUSED BY AUXIN
Thimann, K. V. (1937) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1937.tb09119.x · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Phillips, I. D. J. (1975) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.26.060175.002013 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Romano, C. P., Hein, M. B., & Klee, H. J. (1991) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.5.3.438 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Molecular Genetic Approaches To Plant Hormone Biology
Klee, H. J., & Estelle, M. A. (1991) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.42.1.529 · Cited by 181
Beveridge, C. A., Symons, G. M., Murfet, I. C., Ross, J. J., & Rameau, C. (1997) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.115.3.1251 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Molecular Genetic Approaches to Plant Hormone Biology
Klee, H. J., & Estelle, M. A. (1991) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.002525 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Burg, S. P., & Burg, E. A. (1968) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.43.7.1069 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
The shoot controls zeatin riboside export from pea roots. Evidence from the branching mutant rms4
Beveridge, C. A., Murfet, I. C., Kerhoas, L., Sotta, B., Miginiac, É., & Rameau, C. (1997) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.11020339.x · Cited by 170 · see citing works
On the nature of correlative inhibition
SNOW, R. (1937) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1937.tb06917.x · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Morris, D. A. (1977) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00387930 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Localization of Cytokinin Biosynthetic Sites in Pea Plants and Carrot Roots
Chen, C.-M., Ertl, J. R., Leisner, S. M., & Chang, C.-C. (1985) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.78.3.510 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Growth and Development of the axr1 Mutants of Arabidopsis
Lincoln, C., Britton, J. H., & Estelle, M. A. (1990) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.2307/3869260 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Regulation of cytokinin content in plant cells
Kamínek, M., Motyka, V., & Vaňková, R. (1997) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb01053.x · Cited by 153 · see citing works
<i>AXR1</i> Acts after Lateral Bud Formation to Inhibit Lateral Bud Growth in Arabidopsis
Stirnberg, P., Chatfield, S. P., & Leyser, H. M. O. (1999) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.121.3.839 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Self-citationExogenous Auxin Effects on Lateral Bud Outgrowth in Decapitated Shoots
CLINE, M. (1996) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1006/anbo.1996.0119 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Beveridge, C. A., Ross, J. J., & Murfet, I. C. (1994) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.104.3.953 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Uncoupling Auxin and Ethylene Effects in Transgenic Tobacco and Arabidopsis Plants.
Romano, C. P., Cooper, M. L., & Klee, H. J. (1993) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.5.2.181 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Gocal, G. F. W., Pharis, R. P., Yeung, E. C., & Pearce, D. (1991) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.95.2.344 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Hall, S. M., & Hillman, J. R. (1975) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00383862 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Auxin-Cytokinin Interactions in Wild-Type and Transgenic Tobacco
Eklöf, S., Åstot, C., Blackwell, J., Möritz, T., Olsson, O., & Sandberg, G. (1997) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029157 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
The Roles of Phytohormones in Development as Studied in Transgenic Plants
Klee, H. J., Romano, C. P., & Binns, A. N. (1994) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689409701918 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Apical Dominance in Vicia faba
PANIGRAHI, B. M., & AUDUS, L. J. (1966) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084089 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
SOME EXPERIMENTS ON BUD GROWTH
Went, F. W. (1939) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1939.tb12877.x · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Uncoupling Auxin and Ethylene Effects in Transgenic Tobacco and Arabidopsis Plants
Romano, C. P., Cooper, M. L., & Klee, H. J. (1993) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.2307/3869584 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Morris, D., & Johnson, C. (1990) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00202333 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Regulation of bud dormancy by manipulation of ABA in isolated buds of Rosa hybrida cultured in vitro
Bris, M. L., Michaux-Ferrière, N., Jacob, Y., et al. (1999) · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1071/pp98133 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Auxin and Kinetin Interaction in Apical Dominance
Davies, C. R., Seth, A. K., & Wareing, P. F. (1966) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.151.3709.468 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Hormonal regulation of apical dominance in soybeans
Ali, A., & Fletcher, R. A. (1970) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b70-290 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Harborne, J. B. (1984) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(00)80461-6 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
SOME RESPONSES OF PLANTS TO 2,3,5-TRIIODOBENZOIC ACID
Snyder, W. E. (1949) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.24.2.195 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Ethylene, indoleacetic acid and apical dominance in peas: A reappraisal
Blake, T. J., Reid, D. M., & Rood, S. B. (1983) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1983.tb04234.x · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Tamas, I. A., Schlossberg-Jacobs, J. L., Lim, R., Friedman, L. B., & Barone, C. C. (1989) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/bf00024774 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The possible role of cytokinins, ethylene and indoleacetic acid in apical dominance
Li, C. J., & Bangerth, F. (1992) · Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2458-4_50 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Hormonal interaction in controlling apical dominance in soybeans
Ali, A., & Fletcher, R. A. (1971) · Canadian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1139/b71-243 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Pearce, D. W., Taylor, J. S., Robertson, J. M., Harker, K. N., & Daly, E. J. (1995) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb00791.x · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Interaction between auxins, gibberellins and kinins in hormone-directed transport
Seth, A., & Wareing, P. F. (1964) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/0024-3205(64)90092-x · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Stafstrom, J. P. (1993) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-9607-0_12 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
The hormonal regulation of bud outgrowth in Phaseolus vulgaris L.
Hillman, J. (1970) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00387174 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Phillips, I. D. J. (1969) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00388957 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Patrick, J. (1979) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00381262 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The Second Messenger in Apical Dominance Controlled by Auxin
Russell, W., & Thimann, K. V. (1990) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-74545-4_49 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
The Roles of Phytohormones in Development as Studied in Transgenic Plants
Klee, H. J., & Romano, C. P. (1994) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/713608064 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Piola, F., Label, P., Vergne, P., et al. (1998) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s002990050571 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Croxdale, J. G. (1977) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00391907 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Lim, R., & Tamas, I. A. (1989) · Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/bf00024773 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The effect of decapitation on the levels of IAA and ABA in the lateral buds of Betula pendula roth
Galoch, E., Zielińska, M., & Burkacka-Łaukajtys, E. (1998) · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum · doi:10.1007/s11738-998-0026-0 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
SHEIN, T., & JACKSON, D. I. (1972) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084635 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Pearce, D. W., Taylor, J. S., Robertson, J. M., et al. (1995) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.1995.940116.x · Cited by 2
Studies on the Growth Hormone of Plants
Thimann, K. V., & Bonner, J. (1932) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.18.12.692
Regulation of cytokinin content in plant cells
Kaminek, M., Motyka, V., & Vankova, R. (1997) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.1997.1010404.x
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Hillman J., 1984, Hormonal Plant Physiology, 127
- Russell W., 1988, Plant Growth Substances, 419
- Tucker D.J., 1980, Apical dominance. A personal view., Br. Plant Growth Regul. Group News Bull., 4, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
<i>Arabidopsis BRANCHED1</i> Acts as an Integrator of Branching Signals within Axillary Buds
Aguilar-Martínez, J. A., Poza-Carrión, C., & Cubas, P. (2007) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.106.048934 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
“The auxin:cytokinin ratio is a strong determinant of the degree of lateral shoot outgrowth (Sachs and Thimann, 1967; Chatfield et al., 2000).”
BackgroundInfluentialFranklin, K. A. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02507.x · Cited by 801 · see citing works
“These include elongation growth and apical dominance, processes commonly associated with shade avoidance (Chatfield et al., 2000; Sawa et al., 2002).”
BackgroundLin, H., Wang, R., Qian, Q., Yan, M., Meng, X., Fu, Z., Yan, C., Jiang, B., Su, Z., Li, J., et al. (2009) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.109.065987 · Cited by 670 · see citing works
“outgrowth of tiller buds of the wild type was significantly promoted, which is consistent with the long-established concept that too little auxin transport also leads to an increased shoot branching (Chatfield et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMolecular Basis of Plant Architecture
Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2008) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092902 · Cited by 643 · see citing works
Hormonal Interactions in the Regulation of Plant Development
Vanstraelen, M., & Benková, E. (2012) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155741 · Cited by 631 · see citing works
<i>DWARF10</i> , an <i>RMS1/MAX4/DAD1</i> ortholog, controls lateral bud outgrowth in rice
Arite, T., Iwata, H., Ohshima, K., Maekawa, M., Nakajima, M., Kojima, M., Sakakibara, H., & Kyozuka, J. (2007) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03210.x · Cited by 618 · see citing works
Sorefan, K., Booker, J., Haurogné, K., Goussot, M., Bainbridge, K., Foo, E., Chatfield, S., Ward, S., Beveridge, C., Rameau, C., et al. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.256603 · Cited by 604 · see citing works
“This substance is very unlikely to be ABA because of the lack of ABA-related phenotypes in max4 mutants (data not shown) and the lack of requirement for ABA in auxin-mediated inhibition of bud outgrowth (Chatfield et al. 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationBooker, J., Auldridge, M. E., Wills, S., McCarty, D. R., Klee, H. J., & Leyser, O. (2004) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.06.061 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Self-citationBooker, J., Sieberer, T., Wright, W. J., Williamson, L. C., Willett, B., Stirnberg, P., Turnbull, C. G. N., Srinivasan, M., Goddard, P., & Leyser, O. (2005) · Developmental Cell · doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2005.01.009 · Cited by 556 · see citing works
Self-citationAuxin, cytokinin and the control of shoot branching
Müller, D., & Leyser, O. (2011) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcr069 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Self-citationThe microRNA regulated SBP-box genes SPL9 and SPL15 control shoot maturation in Arabidopsis
Schwarz, Š., Grande, A. V., Bujdoso, N., Saedler, H., & Huijser, P. (2008) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9310-z · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Auxin controls local cytokinin biosynthesis in the nodal stem in apical dominance
Tanaka, M., Takei, K., Kojima, M., Sakakibara, H., & Mori, H. (2006) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02656.x · Cited by 512 · see citing works
The Arabidopsis MAX Pathway Controls Shoot Branching by Regulating Auxin Transport
Bennett, T., Sieberer, T., Willett, B., Booker, J., Luschnig, C., & Leyser, O. (2006) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.058 · Cited by 488 · see citing works
Self-citationXu, M., Zhu, L., Shou, H., & Wu, P. (2005) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pci183 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Antagonistic action of strigolactone and cytokinin in bud outgrowth control
Dun, E. A., de Saint Germain, A., Rameau, C., & Beveridge, C. A. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.186783 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
“The growth of activated wild-type Arabidopsis buds on isolated nodal segments in split-plate assays is accelerated by basal treatment with 6-benzylaminopurine (BA; synthetic CK) to the medium (Chatfield et al., 2000).”
BackgroundGiliberto, L., Perrotta, G., Pallara, P., Weller, J. L., Fraser, P. D., Bramley, P. M., Fiore, A., Tavazza, M., & Giuliano, G. (2004) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.104.051987 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
“Apical dominance is a complex phenomenon involving the hormones auxin and cytokinin (Chatfield et al., 2000) as well as other, yet unidentified signaling molecules (Booker et al., 2004).”
BackgroundZou, J., Zhang, S., Zhang, W., Li, G., Chen, Z., Zhai, W., Zhao, X. F., Pan, X., Xie, Q., & Zhu, L. (2006) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02916.x · Cited by 426 · see citing works
“Apically derived auxin is known to regulate shoot branching by inhibiting the activity of axillary meristems in Arabidopsis, and many other plants (Chatfield et al., 2000), but its mechanism of action is complex and indirect (reviewed by Leyser, 2003). Xu et al. (2005) reported that, in OsPIN1 RNAi transgenic plants,…”
BackgroundStrigolactones enhance competition between shoot branches by dampening auxin transport
Crawford, S., Shinohara, N., Sieberer, T., Williamson, L., George, G., Hepworth, J., Müller, D., Domagalska, M. A., & Leyser, O. (2010) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.051987 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
“We therefore investigated the ability of 5 M basal GR24 to inhibit bud activation in the presence of 0.5 M apical NAA, which usually inhibits bud outgrowth for about 3 days (Chatfield et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationHormonal control of shoot branching
Ongaro, V., & Leyser, O. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erm134 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
“Downloaded from http://jxb.oxfordjournals.org by on 26 February 2010 transpiration stream can release Arabidopsis buds from inhibition imposed by apical auxin ( Chatfield et al., 2000 ).”
MethodSelf-citationAuldridge, M. E., Block, A. K., Vogel, J. T., Dabney‐Smith, C., Mila, I., Bouzayen, M., Magallanes‐Lundback, M., DellaPenna, D., McCarty, D. R., & Klee, H. J. (2006) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02666.x · Cited by 369 · see citing works
“While ABA has been implicated in bud inhibition (Chatfield et al., 2000), none of the NCED loss-of-function mutants display a shoot branching phenotype (B.”
BackgroundMultiple pathways regulate shoot branching
Rameau, C., Bertheloot, J., Leduc, N., Andrieu, B., Foucher, F., & Sakr, S. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00741 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Control of Outgrowth and Dormancy in Axillary Buds
Shimizu‐Sato, S., & Mori, H. (2001) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.010841 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
McSteen, P., & Leyser, O. (2005) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.56.032604.144122 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Self-citationBarbier, F. F., Péron, T., Lecerf, M., Pérez-Garcia, M.-D., Barrière, Q., Rolc̆ı́k, J., Boutet‐Mercey, S., Citerne, S., Lemoine, R., Porcheron, B., et al. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erv047 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
“To monitor sugar availability for buds, we cultivated bud-bearing stem segments in vitro and supplied them with different sugar conditions, including different sucrose concentrations and non-metabolizable sucrose analogues (Chatfield et al., 2000; Henry et al., 2011; Rabot et al., 2012).”
Method<i>BRANCHED1</i> Promotes Axillary Bud Dormancy in Response to Shade in <i>Arabidopsis</i>
González-Grandío, E., Poza-Carrión, C., Sorzano, C. O. S., & Cubas, P. (2013) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.112.108480 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
“Direct ABA applications support a role of ABA in bud suppression (Chatfield et al., 2000), but the genetic evidence is contradictory: Arabidopsis sextuple mutants for six ABA receptors (PYR1, PYL1, PYL2, PYL4, PYL5, and PYL8), which display dramatically impaired ABA-dependent gene expression (Gonzalez-Guzman et al.”
BackgroundHubbard, L., McSteen, P., Doebley, J., & Hake, S. (2002) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/162.4.1927 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
An analysis of sucker regeneration of trembling aspen
Frey, B. R., Lieffers, V. J., Landhäusser, S. M., et al. (2003) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x03-053 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
The Arabidopsis transcription factor HY5 integrates light and hormone signaling pathways
Cluis, C. P., Mouchel, C. F., & Hardtke, C. S. (2004) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02052.x · Cited by 267 · see citing works
The control of shoot branching: an example of plant information processing
Leyser, O. (2009) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01930.x · Cited by 253 · see citing works
“Consistent with a role for this pathway in bud regulation, AXR1 is necessary for the full inhibition of Arabidopsis buds by apical auxin (Chatfield et al. 2000).”
BackgroundSelf-citationImproving Lodging Resistance: Using Wheat and Rice as Classical Examples
Shah, L., Yahya, M., Shah, S. M. A., Nadeem, M., Ali, A. R., Ali, A., Wang, J., Riaz, M. W., Rehman, S., Wu, W., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms20174211 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Auxin cross-talk: integration of signalling pathways to control plant development
Swarup, R., Parry, G., Graham, N. S., Allen, T., & Bennett, M. J. (2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0377-3_12 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
“The ratio hypothesis has been extended to the intact plant to explain other hormone-regulated developmental processes such as apical dominance (Chatfield et al., 2000; Kotov and Kotova, 2000; Emery et al., 1998).”
BackgroundRegulation of shoot branching by auxin
Leyser, O. (2003) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2003.09.008 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citationApical Dominance and Shoot Branching. Divergent Opinions or Divergent Mechanisms?
Dun, E. A., Ferguson, B. J., & Beveridge, C. A. (2006) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.106.086868 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
“Tamas et al. (1989) and Chatfield et al. (2000) showed that apical application of NPA prevents the inhibitory effect of auxin on bud outgrowth in detached stem segments of Phaseolus and Arabidopsis, respectively.”
BackgroundAuxin Acts in Xylem-Associated or Medullary Cells to Mediate Apical Dominance
Booker, J., Chatfield, S. P., & Leyser, O. (2003) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.007542 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
“The response of isolated cauline nodes to auxin was determined using the split-plate assay as described by Chatfield et al. (2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAbscisic Acid Is a General Negative Regulator of Arabidopsis Axillary Bud Growth
Yao, C., & Finlayson, S. A. (2015) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.15.00682 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
“These results are in general agreementwith a previous study that proposed a role for ABA in inhibiting auxin transport in Arabidopsis stem segments (Chatfield et al., 2000).”
BackgroundResultCytokinin Targets Auxin Transport to Promote Shoot Branching
Waldie, T., & Leyser, O. (2018) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.17.01691 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
“For testing bud responses to NAA, BA, and GR24, plants were grown under sterile conditions and one-node assays were performed as described previously (Chatfield et al., 2000; Müller et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationHormonal regulation of branching in grasses
McSteen, P. (2009) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.108.129056 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Tantikanjana, T., Yong, J. W. H., Letham, D. S., Griffith, M., Hussain, M., Ljung, K., Sandberg, G., & Sundaresan, V. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.887301 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
“Experimental procedures applied to this problem have progressed from classic studies with exogenous application of hormones, to more recent studies of transgenic plants transformed with bacterial hormone biosynthesis genes (Morris 1986; Tamas 1995; Chatfield et al. 2000; Hedden and Phillips 2000).”
BackgroundZheng, M., Zhang, L. N., Tang, M., Liu, J., Liu, H., Yang, H., Fan, S., Terzaghi, W., Wang, H., & Hua, W. (2019) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13228 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
“Auxin probably partially reduces cytokinin export from roots and synthesis at the node, thus inhibiting bud growth (Chatfield et al., 2000; Nordstrom et al., 2004).”
BackgroundEthylene and Auxin Control the Arabidopsis Response to Decreased Light Intensity
Vandenbussche, F., Vriezen, W. H., Smalle, J., et al. (2003) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.103.022665 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
“These responses also can be induced by auxins (Smalle et al., 1997; Chatfield et al., 2000; Sawa et al., 1 This work was supported by the Fund for Scientific Research (Flanders; grants no.”
BackgroundCytokinin is required for escape but not release from auxin mediated apical dominance
Müller, D., Waldie, T., Miyawaki, K. N., To, J. P. C., Melnyk, C. W., Kieber, J. J., Kakimoto, T., & Leyser, O. (2015) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12862 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
“These results are consistent with previous observations that CKs have relatively little effect on the outgrowth of isolated buds, but they can overcome the suppressive effect of apical auxin (Chatfield et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationShoot and inflorescence branching
Schmitz, G., & Theres, K. (2005) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2005.07.010 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
“The influence of both auxin and cytokinin was confirmed in isolated Arabidopsis inflorescence nodes [28].”
BackgroundAuxin cross-talk: integration of signalling pathways to control plant development
Swarup, R., Parry, G., Graham, N. S., Allen, T., & Bennett, M. J. (2002) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1023/a:1015250929138 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
“The ratio hypothesis has been extended to the intact plant to explain other hormone-regulated developmental processes such as apical dominance (Chatfield et al., 2000; Kotov and Kotova, 2000; Emery et al., 1998).”
BackgroundTsui, M. M. K., & York, J. D. (2009) · Advances in Enzyme Regulation · doi:10.1016/j.advenzreg.2009.12.002 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
“axillary bud growth and hence axillary shoot branching (Chatfield et al., 2000; Napoli et al., 1999).”
BackgroundMediation of Herbicide Effects by Hormone Interactions
Großmann, K. (2003) · Journal of Plant Growth Regulation · doi:10.1007/s00344-003-0020-0 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Connective Auxin Transport in the Shoot Facilitates Communication between Shoot Apices
Bennett, T., Hines, G., van Rongen, M., Waldie, T., Sawchuk, M. G., Scarpella, E., Ljung, K., & Leyser, O. (2016) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002446 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“Plates containing 55 ml of ATS-agar (no sucrose) [79] were made, from which a 1 cm band was removed when set, leaving two 25 ml blocks of agar (after [40]).”
MethodSelf-citationSugar availability suppresses the auxin‐induced strigolactone pathway to promote bud outgrowth
Bertheloot, J., Barbier, F. F., Boudon, F., Pérez-Garcia, M.-D., Péron, T., Citerne, S., Dun, E. A., Beveridge, C. A., Godin, C., & Sakr, S. (2019) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.16201 · Cited by 158 · see citing works
Degenhardt, R. F., & Bonham‐Smith, P. C. (2008) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.107.111799 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
“As RPL23aA-ihp-4 has aberrant phyllotaxis, apical dominance, and root development, all of which are auxin-mediated processes (Reed et al., 1998; Chatfield et al., 2000; Reinhardt, 2005), we investigated whether vascular patterning was also disrupted.”
BackgroundStrigolactone regulates shoot development through a core signalling pathway
Bennett, T., Liang, Y., Seale, M., Ward, S. P., Müller, D., & Leyser, O. (2016) · Biology Open · doi:10.1242/bio.021402 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“5 mm in length were excised and placed between two agar blocks, to which hormones could be added independently (Chatfield et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAbscisic Acid Regulates Axillary Bud Outgrowth Responses to the Ratio of Red to Far-Red Light
Reddy, S. K., Holalu, S. V., Casal, J. J., & Finlayson, S. A. (2013) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.113.221895 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
“However, several studies using exogenous ABA (Arney and Mitchell, 1969; Chatfield et al., 2000; Cline and Oh, 2006), the carotenoid (and ABA) biosynthesis inhibitor fluridone (Le Bris et al., 1999), or excised nodes of transgenic ABA-insensitive plants (Arend et al., 2009) have implied a role for…”
BackgroundAgustí, J., Lichtenberger, R., Schwarz, M., Nehlin, L., & Greb, T. (2011) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1001312 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
“Ex planta tissue-culture systems have been used very successfully for analyzing various plant developmental processes [38,42,51,52], demonstrating the robustness of plant organ dynamics when exposed to selected key signals.”
BackgroundMethodHormonally controlled expression of the Arabidopsis <i>MAX4</i> shoot branching regulatory gene
Bainbridge, K., Sorefan, K., Ward, S., & Leyser, O. (2005) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02548.x · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Self-citationZou, J., Chen, Z., Zhang, S., Zhang, W., Jiang, G., Zhao, X. F., Zhai, W., Pan, X., & Zhu, L. (2005) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-005-0007-0 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“(Cline 1991; Chatfield et al. 2000 ), but, as shown in the present study, we could not find possible relations between the high tillering characteristic of the htd-1 mutant and the two plant hormones IAA and ABA.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialGrowth and productivity of potato as influenced by cultivar and reproductive growth
Tekalign, T., & Hammes, P. S. (2005) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.021 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“Chatfield et al. (2000) reported that shoot apical meristem maintains its role as the primary site of growth by inhibiting the growth of axillary meristems.”
BackgroundLight and Plant Growth Regulators on In Vitro Proliferation
Cavallaro, V., Pellegrino, A., Muleo, R., & Forgione, I. (2022) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants11070844 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Strigolactone regulation of shoot branching in chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum)
Liang, J., Zhao, L., CHALLIS, R. J., & Leyser, O. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq133 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“The hormone responses of buds on isolated stem segments were assessed using the method described by Chatfield et al. (2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSeale, M., Bennett, T., & Leyser, O. (2017) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.145649 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
“Plants were grown axenically and stem segments bearing one cauline node with an associated bud less than 1.5 mm were excised and inserted between two agar slabs in a Petri dish (Chatfield et al., 2000).”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationRuonala, R., Rinne, P., Baghour, M., Möritz, T., Tuominen, H., & Kangasjärvi, J. (2006) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02722.x · Cited by 116 · see citing works
“The indirect effect of auxin appears not to be relayed by ethylene in Arabidopsis (Chatfield et al., 2000).”
BackgroundLight Signaling in Bud Outgrowth and Branching in Plants
Leduc, N., Roman, H., Barbier, F. F., Péron, T., Huché‐Thélier, L., Lothier, J., Demotes‐Mainard, S., & Sakr, S. (2014) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants3020223 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
“The involvement of ABA as a possible inhibitor of shoot branching has been considered, based on the facts that (i) increased auxin levels go along with higher ABA levels in axillary buds [158–160]; (ii) ABA levels in dormant axillary buds decrease in response to decapitation of the main shoot [159,161]; and (iii) exog…”
BackgroundWard, S. P., & Leyser, O. (2003) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2003.10.002 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Self-citationPhotosynthetic leaf area modulates tiller bud outgrowth in sorghum
Kebrom, T. H., & Mullet, J. E. (2014) · Plant Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12500 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Barbier, F. F., Cao, D., Fichtner, F., Weiste, C., Pérez-Garcia, M.-D., Caradeuc, M., Gourrierec, J. L., Sakr, S., & Beveridge, C. A. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17427 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Strigolactone Inhibition of Branching Independent of Polar Auxin Transport
Brewer, P. B., Dun, E. A., Gui, R., Mason, M. G., & Beveridge, C. A. (2015) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.15.00014 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Li, X., Chen, X., Guo, X., et al. (2015) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12474 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Schneider, A., Godin, C., Boudon, F., Demotes‐Mainard, S., Sakr, S., & Bertheloot, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01296 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“…of bud outgrowth was long hypothesized based on the observations that exogenous ABA supply inhibits bud outgrowth (White and Mansfield, 1977; Chatfield et al., 2000; Cline and Oh, 2006; Corot et al., 2017; Yuan et al., 2018) and that the bud ABA content is negatively correlated to the bud…”
BackgroundABA and Bud Dormancy in Perennials: Current Knowledge and Future Perspective
Pan, W., Liang, J., Sui, J., Li, J., Liu, C., Xin, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, S., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., et al. (2021) · Genes · doi:10.3390/genes12101635 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Auxin and cytokinin coordinate the dormancy and outgrowth of axillary bud in strawberry runner
Qiu, Y., Guan, S., Wen, C., Li, P., Gao, Z., & Chen, X. (2019) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-019-2151-x · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Exogenous hormonal application improves grain yield of wheat by optimizing tiller productivity
Cai, T., Xu, H., Peng, D., et al. (2013) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.008 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Cai, T., Meng, X., Liu, X., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01886 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
“, 2014), hormones play key roles in the development of wheat tillering, and the external application of hormones can regulate the occurrence and growth of tillers (Chatfield et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2011b).”
BackgroundPeng, M., Cui, Y., Bi, Y., & Rothstein, S. J. (2006) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2006.02691.x · Cited by 83 · see citing works
“for an auxin effect on axillary bud outgrowth was carried out using a split plate system (Chatfield et al., 2000).”
MethodPhytochrome B Promotes Branching in Arabidopsis by Suppressing Auxin Signaling
Reddy, S. K., & Finlayson, S. A. (2014) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.113.234021 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“Vol. 164, 2014 phyB Axillary Bud Outgrowth Shows Elevated Sensitivity to Auxin To explore whether the branching defect in phyB was a result of increased auxin responsiveness, a split plate bud outgrowth assay (Chatfield et al., 2000) was conducted.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAuxin signalling: the beginning, the middle and the end
Leyser, O. (2001) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00189-8 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationSuppression of a Vegetative MADS Box Gene of Potato Activates Axillary Meristem Development
Rosin, F. M., Hart, J. K., Onckelen, H. A. V., & Hannapel, D. J. (2003) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.102.012500 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“Chatfield et al. (2000) demonstrated that basipetal auxin transport was a potent inhibitor of axillary meristem growth.”
BackgroundEthylene‐triggered abscisic acid: A principle in plant growth regulation?
Großmann, K., & Hansen, H. (2001) · Physiologia Plantarum · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2001.1130102.x · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Kebrom, T. H., & Mullet, J. E. (2016) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.16.00014 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
“Cytokinin (CK) promotes and ABA inhibits bud outgrowth through their actions within the bud (Pillay 180 and Railton, 1983; Chatfield et al., 2000; Shimizu-Sato and Mori, 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Interactions among DWARF10, Auxin and Cytokinin Underlie Lateral Bud Outgrowth in Rice
Zhang, S., Li, G., Fang, J., Chen, W., Jiang, H., Zou, J., Liu, X., Zhao, X. F., Li, X., Chu, C., et al. (2010) · Journal of Integrative Plant Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00960.x · Cited by 75 · see citing works
“However, in Arabidopsis, there were also the cases where the elevated auxin transport in max mutants caused the increased branching phenotype (Chatfield et al. 2000; Bennett et al. 2006).”
BackgroundLessons from a century of apical dominance research
Beveridge, C. A., Rameau, C., & Yapa, A. W. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erad137 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“Genetic studies indicated that ABA was not a good candidate for the secondary messenger because auxin inhibition of bud outgrowth was not affected in ABA-insensitive mutants (Chatfield et al., 2000) and ABA mutants do not collectively exhibit altered branching phenotypes.”
Axillary bud outgrowth in herbaceous shoots: how do strigolactones fit into the picture?
Waldie, T., Hayward, A. C., & Beveridge, C. A. (2010) · Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/s11103-010-9599-2 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“In these isolated nodes, basally supplied cytokinin can counteract the inhibitory effect of apically supplied auxin on bud outgrowth ( Chatfield et al. 2000 ).”
BackgroundRole of Cytokinin, Strigolactone, and Auxin Export on Outgrowth of Axillary Buds in Apple
Tan, M., Li, G., Chen, X., Xing, L., Ma, J., Zhang, D., Ge, H., Han, M., Sha, G., & An, N. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00616 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
“Exogenous auxin or endogenous auxin produced in stem tissues indirectly inhibit branching, and involving the expression of SL biosynthesis genes and repression of CK biosynthesis in stem tissues (Chatfield et al., 2000; Brewer et al., 2009; Young et al., 2014).”
BackgroundOutgrowth of the axillary bud in rose is controlled by sugar metabolism and signalling
Wang, M., Pérez-Garcia, M.-D., Davière, J., Barbier, F. F., Ogé, L., Gentilhomme, J., Voisine, L., Péron, T., Launay‐Avon, A., Clément, G., et al. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erab046 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Jang, C. S., Kamps, T. L., Skinner, D., Schulze, S. R., Vencill, W. K., & Paterson, A. H. (2006) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.106.082891 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
“Although auxin is recognized as an inhibitor of lateral bud growth, Chatfield et al. (2000) suggested that cytokinin may act independently as a key hormone for regulation of initiation and early outgrowth of axillary buds, such as those leading to rhizomes.”
BackgroundSekhar, S., Panda, B. B., Mohapatra, T., Das, K., Shaw, B. P., Kariali, E., & Mohapatra, P. K. (2015) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2015.03.003 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
FHY3 promotes shoot branching and stress tolerance in Arabidopsis in an AXR1‐dependent manner
Stirnberg, P., Zhao, S., Williamson, L. C., Ward, S. P., & Leyser, O. (2012) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2012.05038.x · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“Secondly, increased branching in axr1 may be due to increased cytokinin biosynthesis, because auxin suppresses cytokinin biosynthesis in an AXR1-dependent manner (Nordström et al., 2004), and stem-derived cytokinin can activate bud growth (Chatfield et al., 2000).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationA Reappraisal of the Role of Abscisic Acid and its Interaction with Auxin in Apical Dominance
Cline, M. G., & OH, C. (2006) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcl173 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“Chatfield et al. (2000) reported strong inhibition of lateral bud growth with basally applied ABA in Landsberg erecta but not in the Columbia ecotype of A. thaliana.”
BackgroundInfluentialWen, L., Zhong, W. J., Huo, X., Zhuang, W., Ni, Z., & Gao, Z. (2016) · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/14620316.2016.1160546 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Suttle, J. C. (2007) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044451018-1/50056-7 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Overexpression of a petunia zinc‐finger gene alters cytokinin metabolism and plant forms
Nakagawa, H., Jiang, C., Sakakibara, H., Kojima, M., Honda, I., Ajisaka, H., Nishijima, T., Koshioka, M., Homma, T., Mander, L. N., et al. (2004) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02316.x · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Signals Regulating Dormancy in Vegetative Buds
Chao, W. S., & Anderson, V. J. (2007) · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Tan, M., Li, G., Qi, S., Liu, X., Chen, X., Ma, J., Zhang, D., & Han, M. (2018) · Gene · doi:10.1016/j.gene.2018.01.101 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Wang, G., Römheld, V., Li, C., & Bangerth, F. K. (2005) · Journal of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2005.09.014 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Signaling network regulating plant branching: Recent advances and new challenges
Kotov, A. A., Kotova, L. M., & Romanov, G. A. (2021) · Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.110880 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Nie, J., Wen, C., Xi, L., Lv, S., Zhao, Q., Kou, Y., Ma, N., Zhao, L., & Zhou, X. (2018) · Plant Cell Reports · doi:10.1007/s00299-018-2290-9 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Little, C. H. A., MacDonald, J. E., & Olsson, O. (2002) · International Journal of Plant Sciences · doi:10.1086/339642 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Cui, X., Ge, C., Wang, R., Wang, H., Chen, W., Fu, Z., Jiang, X., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2010) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2010.51 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Holalu, S. V., & Finlayson, S. A. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erw479 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
“Pharmaceutical approaches have shown that exogenous ABA treatment inhibits branching in a variety of species (Arney and Mitchell, 1969; Chatfield et al., 2000; Cline and Oh, 2006), whereas the ABA biosynthesis inhibitor fluridone promoted branching in rose (Rosa hybrida) (Le Bris et al.”
BackgroundDierck, R., Keyser, E. D., Riek, J. D., Dhooghe, E., Huylenbroeck, J. V., Prinsen, E., & Straeten, D. V. D. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161732 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Growth and productivity of potato as influenced by cultivar and reproductive growth
Tekalign, T., & Hammes, P. S. (2005) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2005.01.029 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Corot, A., Roman, H., Douillet, O., Autret, H., Pérez-Garcia, M.-D., Citerne, S., Bertheloot, J., Sakr, S., Leduc, N., & Demotes‐Mainard, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01724 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“…to the stem inhibited bud outgrowth in rose under high PPFD, i.e., in environmental conditions favorable to outgrowth, in accordance with previous data in Arabidopsis, pea, Ipomoea nil, and tomato (Arney and Mitchell, 1969; Chatfield et al., 2000; Cline and Oh, 2006; Yao and Finlayson, 2015).”
InfluentialHaq, B. U., Ahmad, M. Z., Rehman, N. U., Wang, J., Li, P., Li, D., & Zhao, J. H. (2017) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-017-1182-4 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“SLs and auxins together control shoot budding and branching [17, 50].”
Chen, X., Zhou, X., Xi, L., Li, J., Zhao, R., Ma, N., & Zhao, L. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061717 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“plant growth regulators (PGR) were applied on two-bud segments including bud 3 and bud 4 cultured in a split-plate system (Figure S4) [46].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
- Authors
- Chatfield, S. P., Stirnberg, P., Forde, B. G., & Leyser, O.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- Lancaster University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Leyser, Ottoline
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-169
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2070702008
- Semantic Scholar
- e5cf2b14ba6d4791675335aae6be357567843f9b
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 14.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Plant Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Directorate for Biological Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
- Keywords
- axillary bud outgrowth, cytokinins, ethylene, abscisic acid, second messengers, Arabidopsis thaliana
- MeSH terms
- Abscisic Acid, Cytokinins, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Interactions, Ethylenes, Indoleacetic Acids, Plant Growth Regulators, Arabidopsis, Plant Shoots
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review