The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Association of Illness with Prior Ingestion of Novel Foods
Abstract
Rats were permitted to ingest a novel food and a familiar food. One hour later they were x-irradiated. When they were subsequently allowed to choose between these foods, their preference for the novel food was less than that exhibited by appropriate controls.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Specific hungers and poison avoidance as adaptive specializations of learning.
Rozin, P., & Kalat, J. W. (1971) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0031878 · Cited by 1,163
Garcia, J., Hankins, W. G., & Rusiniak, K. W. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4154.824 · Cited by 1,123
Endotoxin produces a depressive-like episode in rats
Yirmiya, R. (1996) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(95)01415-2 · Cited by 604
The Selection of Foods by Rats, Humans, and Other Animals
Rozin, P. (1976) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60081-9 · Cited by 474
"Learned safety" as a mechanism in long-delay taste-aversion learning in rats.
Kalat, J. W., & Rozin, P. (1973) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0034424 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Revusky, S. H., & Bedarf, E. W.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1967-01-13
- Volume
- 155
- Issue
- 3759
- Pages
- 219-220
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1503415600
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Illness with Prior Ingestion of Novel Foods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.155.3759.219
- The paper
- Revusky, S. H., & Bedarf, E. W. (1967). Association of Illness with Prior Ingestion of Novel Foods. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.155.3759.219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
