The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Response of a Protein Structure to Cavity-Creating Mutations and Its Relation to the Hydrophobic Effect
Open accessAbstract
Six "cavity-creating" mutants, Leu 46 → Ala (L46A), L99A, L118A, L121A, L133A, and Phe 153 → Ala (F153A), were constructed within the hydrophobic core of phage T4 lysozyme. The substitutions decreased the stability of the protein at pH 3.0 by different amounts, ranging from 2.7 kilocalories per mole (kcal mol -1 ) for L46A and L121A to 5.0 kcal mol -1 for L99A. The double mutant L99A/F153A was also constructed and decreased in stability by 8.3 kcal mol -1 . The x-ray structures of all of the variants were determined at high resolution. In every case, removal of the wild-type side chain allowed some of the surrounding atoms to move toward the vacated space but a cavity always remained, which ranged in volume from 24 cubic angstroms (Å 3 ) for L46A to 150 Å 3 for L99A. No solvent molecules were observed in any of these cavities. The destabilization of the mutant Leu → Ala proteins relative to wild type can be approximated by a constant term (∼2.0 kcal mol -1 ) plus a term that increases in proportion to the size of the cavity. The constant term is approximately equal to the transfer free energy of leucine relative to alanine as determined from partitioning between aqueous and organic solvents. The energy term that increases with the size of the cavity can be expressed either in terms of the cavity volume (24 to 33 cal mol -1 Å -3 ) or in terms of the cavity surface area (20 cal mol -1 Å -2 ). The results suggest how to reconcile a number of conflicting reports concerning the strength of the hydrophobic effect in proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Redesigning an FKBP–ligand interface to generate chemical dimerizers with novel specificity
Clackson, T., Yang, W., Rozamus, L. W., Hatada, M., Amara, J. F., Rollins, C. T., Stevenson, L. F., Magari, S. R., Wood, S. A., Courage, N. L., et al. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.18.10437 · Cited by 558
Rohloff, J. C., Gelinas, A. D., Jarvis, T. C., Ochsner, U. A., Schneider, D. J., Gold, L., & Janjic, N. (2014) · Molecular Therapy - Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1038/mtna.2014.49 · Cited by 533
Additivity principles in biochemistry.
Dill, K. A. (1997) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.272.2.701 · Cited by 347
Ogata, K., Kanei-Ishii, C., Sasaki, M., Hatanaka, H., Nagadoi, A., Enari, M., Nakamura, H., Nishimura, Y., Ishii, S., & Sarai, A. (1996) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0296-178 · Cited by 320
Systematic mutational analysis of the yeast ACT1 gene.
Wertman, K. F., Drubin, D. G., & Botstein, D. (1992) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/132.2.337 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Eriksson, A. E., Baase, W. A., Zhang, X. J., Heinz, D. W., Blaber, M., Baldwin, E. P., & Matthews, B. W.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1992-01-10
- Volume
- 255
- Issue
- 5041
- Pages
- 178-183
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2069297570
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of a Protein Structure to Cavity-Creating Mutations and Its Relation to the Hydrophobic Effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.1553543
- The paper
- Eriksson, A. E., Baase, W. A., Zhang, X. J., Heinz, D. W., Blaber, M., Baldwin, E. P., & Matthews, B. W. (1992). Response of a Protein Structure to Cavity-Creating Mutations and Its Relation to the Hydrophobic Effect. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1553543
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.