The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simultaneously Recorded Trains of Action Potentials: Analysis and Functional Interpretation
Abstract
A new kind of statistical display, the joint peri-stimulus-time scatter diagram, facilitates the analysis and interpretation of two or more simultaneously recorded trains of action potentials. The display is a generalization of the cross correlation and the peri-stimulus-time histogram, and it reflects specific underlying neuronal interactions. The technique yields quantitative measures of interaction in terms of effectiveness of synaptic connections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Functional and Effective Connectivity: A Review
Friston, K. J. (2011) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0008 · Cited by 3,415
Reactivation of hippocampal ensemble memories during sleep
Wilson, M. A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1994) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8036517 · Cited by 3,118
Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging
Friston, K. J., Buechel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., & Dolan, R. J. (1997) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0291 · Cited by 3,097
Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis
Friston, K. J. (1994) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460020107 · Cited by 2,452
Dimensionality reduction for large-scale neural recordings
Cunningham, J. P., & Yu, B. M. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3776 · Cited by 1,219
Friston, K. J. (1998) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(97)00140-0 · Cited by 882
Kudrimoti, H. S., Barnes, C. A., & McNaughton, B. L. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-10-04090.1999 · Cited by 753
The elusive concept of brain connectivity
Horwitz, B. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00112-5 · Cited by 779
Analysing connectivity with Granger causality and dynamic causal modelling
Friston, K., Moran, R., & Seth, A. K. (2013) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.11.010 · Cited by 684
Beyond Phrenology: What Can Neuroimaging Tell Us About Distributed Circuitry?
Friston, K. (2002) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142846 · Cited by 465
The Predictive Value of Changes in Effective Connectivity for Human Learning
Büchel, C., Coull, J. T., & Friston, K. J. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.283.5407.1538 · Cited by 447
Understanding brain networks and brain organization
Pessoa, L. (2014) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2014.03.005 · Cited by 464
“concept that was initially devised to characterize how neurons interact and was defined as the “temporal coherence” among the activity of different neurons, as measured by crosscorrelating their spike trains [94-96].”
BackgroundMaier (2010) · Frontiers in System Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2010.00031 · Cited by 266
Time‐dependent changes in effective connectivity measured with PET
Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1993) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460010108 · Cited by 226
Book Review: Brain Function, Nonlinear Coupling, and Neuronal Transients
Friston, K. J. (2001) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/107385840100700510 · Cited by 141
Faull, O. K., & Pattinson, K. T. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.21749 · Cited by 110
“…connectivity’ within neuroimaging is a measure of the temporal synchronicity of activity within structures across the brain, and is thought to be related to the temporal coherence of neuronal activity in anatomically distinct regions (Gerstein and Perkel, 1969; van den Heuvel et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodUsing fMRI to study reward processing in humans: past, present, and future
Wang, K. S., Smith, D. V., & Delgado, M. R. (2016) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00333.2015 · Cited by 105
Esser, S. K., Hill, S., & Tononi, G. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00059.2009 · Cited by 97
Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Nonparametric Adaptive Estimation for Spike Train Analysis
Reynaud-Bouret, P., Rivoirard, V., Grammont, F., & Tuleau-Malot, C. (2014) · The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/2190-8567-4-3 · Cited by 103
Smith, D. V., Gseir, M., Speer, M. E., & Delgado, M. R. (2016) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23216 · Cited by 61
Zick, J. L., Blackman, R. K., Crowe, D. A., Amirikian, B., DeNicola, A. L., Netoff, T. I., & Chafee, M. V. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.05.010 · Cited by 50
Lee, A. K., & Wilson, M. A. (2004) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.01030.2003 · Cited by 40
Lattice physics approaches for neural networks
Bardella, G., Franchini, S., Pani, P., & Ferraina, S. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111390 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerstein, G. L., & Perkel, D. H.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1969-05-16
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 3881
- Pages
- 828-830
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2014744085
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
