Cited by 396Social Power and Status DynamicsSocial Capital and NetworksCross-Cultural and Social Analysis

Interpersonal and Economic Resources: Their structure and differential properties offer new insight into problems of modern society.

Foa, Uriel G.·1971·Science

Abstract

High population density and increased institutional specialization, which are relatively novel features of human society. have provided conditions for a more efficient exchange of universalistic resources, while decreasing the opportunity for exchanging particularistic ones. The parallel with physical environment is striking: in both cases technology has created new problems in the process of solving old ones. Whether it is natural resources or interpersonal resources, physical ecology or social ecology, recognizing and defining the new problem is the first step toward its solution. The importance of particularistic resources in solving problems of modern society has scarcely been recognized. Welfare institutions, for example, often require clients to lose status for the money they receive. This form of exchange deprives the client of a resource which is already scarce for him, thus further reducing his chances of autonomous performance as a resource exchanger in society. By ignoring the significance of particularistic resources for social functioning, we tend to see the solution of social problems exclusively in terms of a better distribution of economic resources. Improvement of education, for instance, is considered almost equivalent to allocating more money for schools. Truly money is one of the neighbors of information in the order, but the other one is status. Evidence to suggest that higher status improves educational achievement has, indeed, been repeatedly reported (…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.171.3969.345

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 19 · Cited by 396

Authors
Foa, U. G.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Foa, Uriel G.
Venue
Science
Published
1971-01-29
Volume
171
Issue
3969
Pages
345-351
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2057335623
Cited by
396
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 33
FWCI
41.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
Keywords
interpersonal resources, social indicators, status, social exchange, social ecology, urban environment, social planning, resource classification, social problems, social welfare institutions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review