Interpersonal and Economic Resources: Their structure and differential properties offer new insight into problems of modern society.
Abstract
High population density and increased institutional specialization, which are relatively novel features of human society. have provided conditions for a more efficient exchange of universalistic resources, while decreasing the opportunity for exchanging particularistic ones. The parallel with physical environment is striking: in both cases technology has created new problems in the process of solving old ones. Whether it is natural resources or interpersonal resources, physical ecology or social ecology, recognizing and defining the new problem is the first step toward its solution. The importance of particularistic resources in solving problems of modern society has scarcely been recognized. Welfare institutions, for example, often require clients to lose status for the money they receive. This form of exchange deprives the client of a resource which is already scarce for him, thus further reducing his chances of autonomous performance as a resource exchanger in society. By ignoring the significance of particularistic resources for social functioning, we tend to see the solution of social problems exclusively in terms of a better distribution of economic resources. Improvement of education, for instance, is considered almost equivalent to allocating more money for schools. Truly money is one of the neighbors of information in the order, but the other one is status. Evidence to suggest that higher status improves educational achievement has, indeed, been repeatedly reported (…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In exchange for other resources such as money, services, time, status and love, people are willing to provide personal resources, including those in the form of personal information.
“In exchange for other resources such as money, services, time, status and love, people are willing to provide personal resources, including those in the form of personal information (Resource Exchange Theory; Donnenwerth and Foa, 1974;Foa, 1971).”
From The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior – a systematic literature review (2017) · cites this paper as Foa, 1971
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 19 · Cited by 396
- Authors
- Foa, U. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Foa, Uriel G.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1971-01-29
- Volume
- 171
- Issue
- 3969
- Pages
- 345-351
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2057335623
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 33
- FWCI
- 41.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
- Keywords
- interpersonal resources, social indicators, status, social exchange, social ecology, urban environment, social planning, resource classification, social problems, social welfare institutions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review