Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,917

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time

Rosenzweig, Michael L.·1971·Science

Abstract

Six reasonable models of trophic exploitation in a two-species ecosystem whose exploiters compete only by depleting each other's resource supply are presented. In each case, increasing the supply of limiting nutrients or energy tends to destroy the steady state. Thus man must be very careful in attempting to enrich an ecosystem in order to increase its food yield. There is a real chance that such activity may result in decimation of the food species that are wanted in greater abundance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.171.3969.385

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 1,917

Metadata

Authors
Rosenzweig, M. L.
Venue
Science
Published
1971-01-29
Volume
171
Issue
3969
Pages
385-387
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2060852353
Cited by
1,917
References
7
FWCI
28.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.171.3969.385
The paper
Rosenzweig, M. L. (1971). Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3969.385

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.