The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Graphical Representation and Stability Conditions of Predator-Prey Interactions
Abstract
The general nature of the predator-prey interaction has been depicted as a graph of predator versus prey densities from which conditions for stability of the interaction are predicted. An example of a three-species interaction is also presented. Variations of the graph are introduced, and it is shown that an otherwise unstable interaction may be stabilized by the presence of either an inviolable prey hiding place, or extremely low predation pressure at moderate predator and high prey densities, or another predator-limiting resource. Stability is always conferred when the predator is severely limited at its equilibrium density by one of its resources other than its supply of prey. Predators should tend to be limited at their equilibrium densities by more than one of their resources. When either of the two foregoing situations pertains, regular predator-prey oscillations should not be observable. The stability of the interaction close to equilibrium was found to depend exclusively, in the mathematically-continuous model, upon the slopes of two lines in the graph at equilibrium. Stability can be asymptotic rather than oscillatory in type. An equation for the period of oscillatory interactions is also advanced. The effects of Natural Selection on the isoclines, and thus the stability, is not clear-cut. Selection of the prey tends to stabilize the interaction; the opposite is true for selection on the predator.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics
Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173179 · Cited by 5,502
Exploitation Ecosystems in Gradients of Primary Productivity
Oksanen, L., Fretwell, S. D., Arruda, J., & Niemela, P. (1981) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283817 · Cited by 1,767
Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature.
McCann, K., Hastings, A., & Huxel, G. R. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/27427 · Cited by 1,657
The Ecology of Fear: Optimal Foraging, Game Theory, and Trophic Interactions
Brown, J. S., Laundre, J. W., & Gurung, M. (1999) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.2307/1383287 · Cited by 1,347
Indirect effects of contaminants in aquatic ecosystems
Fleeger, J. W., Carman, K. R., & Nisbet, R. M. (2003) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/s0048-9697(03)00141-4 · Cited by 963
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosenzweig, M. L., & MacArthur, R. H.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1963-07
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 895
- Pages
- 209-223
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2052125279
- Cited by
- 2,049
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Graphical Representation and Stability Conditions of Predator-Prey Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/282272
- The paper
- Rosenzweig, M. L., & MacArthur, R. H. (1963). Graphical Representation and Stability Conditions of Predator-Prey Interactions. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/282272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.