The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Ortega Hypothesis: Citation analysis suggests that only a few scientists contribute to scientific progress.
Abstract
Let us consider, then, some general conclusions that may be drawn from the findings reported in this study. The data allow us to question the view stated by Ortega, Florey, and others that large numbers of average scientists contribute substantially to the advance of science through their research . It seems, rather, that a relatively small number of physicists produce work that becomes the base for future discoveries in physics. We have found that even papers of relatively minor significance have used to a disproportionate degree the work of the eminent scientists. Although the conclusions of this paper may be reasonably clear, the implications of these data for the structure of scientific activity, at least in physics, need careful consideration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity
Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312705052359 · Cited by 1,642
What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2008) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410810844150 · Cited by 1,607
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again
Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00011183 · Cited by 1,079
Simonton, D. K. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475 · Cited by 722
Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1983) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Cole, J. R., & Cole, S.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1972-10-27
- Volume
- 178
- Issue
- 4059
- Pages
- 368-375
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1974707207
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ortega Hypothesis: Citation analysis suggests that only a few scientists contribute to scientific progress. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.178.4059.368
- The paper
- Cole, J. R., & Cole, S. (1972). The Ortega Hypothesis: Citation analysis suggests that only a few scientists contribute to scientific progress. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.178.4059.368
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.