The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing basic research
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912281589 · Cited by 5,397
Price, D. J. D. S. (1963) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/pric91844 · Cited by 4,264
Garfield, E. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471 · Cited by 2,788
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Massa, M. S. (2018) · The Structure of Theological Revolutions · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190851408.003.0003 · Cited by 1,966
Social Stratification in Science
Cole, J. R., Cole, S., & deB. Beaver, D. (1974) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1987897 · Cited by 1,135
Some Results on the Function and Quality of Citations
Moravcsik, M. J., & Murugesan, P. (1975) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631277500500106 · Cited by 693
Scientific Output and Recognition: A Study in the Operation of the Reward System in Science
Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1967) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091085 · Cited by 647
National Institute Economic Review
(1975) · National Institute Economic Review · doi:10.1177/002795017507300108 · Cited by 549
Scientists at Major and Minor Universities: A Study of Productivity and Recognition
Crane, D. (1965) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091138 · Cited by 502
Citation Indexing for Studying Science
GARFIELD, E. (1970) · Nature · doi:10.1038/227669a0 · Cited by 391
Cited by
A review of the literature on citation impact indicators
Waltman, L. (2016) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007 · Cited by 1,356
Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories
Aksnes, D. W., Langfeldt, L., & Wouters, P. (2019) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244019829575 · Cited by 1,257
Bornmann, L. (2011) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112 · Cited by 567
The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance
Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1985) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(85)90012-5 · Cited by 472
The evolution of science policy and innovation studies
Martin, B. R. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012 · Cited by 379
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J.
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1983-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-90
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1559646899
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 19.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing basic research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7
- The paper
- Martin, B. R., & Irvine, J. (1983). Assessing basic research. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(83)90005-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.