The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities: Research on how similar species divide resources helps reveal the natural regulation of species diversity.
Abstract
To understand resource partitioning, essentially a community phenomenon, we require a holistic theory that draws upon models at the individual and population level. Yet some investigators are still content mainly to document differences between species, a procedure of only limited interest. Therefore, it may be useful to conclude with a list of questions appropriate for studies of resource partitioning, questions this article has related to the theory in a preliminary way. 1) What is the mechanism of competition? What is the relative importance of predation? Are differences likely to be caused by pressures toward reproductive isolation? 2) Are niches (utilizations) regularly spaced along a single dimension? 3) How many dimensions are important, and is there a tendency for more dimensions to be added as species number increases? 4) Is dimensional separation complementary? 5) Which dimensions are utilized, how do they rank in importance, and why? How do particular dimensions change in rank as species nuimber increases? 6) What is the relation of dimensional separation to difference in phenotypic indicators? To what extent does the functional relation of phenotype to resource characteristics constrain partitioning? 7) What is the distance between mean position of niches, what is the niche standard deviation, and what is the ratio of the two? What is the niche shape?
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Coexistence of species that occupy similar niches generally occurs through the differential use of resources, such as food, space, and time (Schoener, 1974).”
From Comparative Craniometric Measurements of Two Sympatric Species of Vulpes in Ikh Nart Nature Reserve, Mongolia (2018) · cites this paper as Schoener, 1974
Citations
Cites
Hutchinson, G. E. (1957) · Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology · doi:10.1101/sqb.1957.022.01.039 · Cited by 6,228
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282454 · Cited by 4,593
The Functional Response of Invertebrate Predators to Prey Density
Holling, C. S. (1966) · Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada · doi:10.4039/entm9848fv · Cited by 1,349
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 146
- ASHMOLE, N.P., BODY SIZE PREY SIZE AND ECOLOGICAL SEGREGATION IN 5 SYMPATRIC TROPICAL TERNS (AVES LARIDAE), SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY 17: 292 (1968). · DOI
- AVERY, R.A., FOOD AND FEEDING RELATIONS OF 3 SPECIES OF TRITURUS (AMPHIBIA URODELA) DURING AQUATIC PHASES, OIKOS 19: 408 (1968). · DOI
- BEDARD, J, FEEDING OF LEAST, CRESTED, AND PARAKEET AUKLETS AROUND ST LAWRENCE ISLAND, ALASKA, CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY 47: 1025 (1969). · DOI
- BREEDLOVE, D.E., COEVOLUTION - PATTERNS OF LEGUME PREDATION BY A LYCAENID BUTTERFLY, OECOLOGIA 10: 99 (1972). · DOI
- BRINKHURST, R.O., PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION OF EXPLOITATION OF SOME POTENTIAL NUTRITIONAL RESOURCES BY 3 SYMPATRIC TUBIFICID OLIGOCHAETES, JOURNAL OF THE FISHERIES RESEARCH BOARD OF CANADA 26: 2659 (1969). · DOI
- BROADHEAD, E, THE PSOCID FAUNA OF LARCH TREES IN NORTHERN ENGLAND - AN ECOLOGICAL STUDY OF MIXED SPECIES POPULATIONS EXPLOITING A COMMON RESOURCE, JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY 27: 217 (1958). · DOI
- BROADLEY, D.G., ZOOLOGICA AFRICANA 3: 1 (1967). · DOI
- BROWN, L.N., JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 45: 189 (1964). · DOI
- BROWN, W.L., CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT, SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY 5: 49 (1956). · DOI
- CAPLAN, E, DIFFERENTIAL FEEDING AND NICHE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG ORTHOPTERA, ECOLOGY 47: 1074 (1966).
- CARPENTER, C.C., COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF THE COMMON GARTER SNAKE (THAMNOPHIS-S-SIRTALIS), THE RIBBON SNAKE (THAMNOPHIS-S-SAURITUS), AND BUTLER GARTER SNAKE (THAMNOPHIS-BUTLERI) IN MIXED POPULATIONS, ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS 22: 235 (1952). · DOI
- CLARKE, B, SYSTEMATICS ASSOCIATION PUBLICATION 4: 393 (1962).
- CODY, M.L., ON METHODS OF RESOURCE DIVISION IN GRASSLAND BIRD COMMUNITIES, AMERICAN NATURALIST 102: 107 (1968). · DOI
- CODY, M.L., COEXISTENCE, COEVOLUTION AND CONVERGENT EVOLUTION IN SEABIRD COMMUNITIES, ECOLOGY 54: 31 (1973). · DOI
- CONNELL, J.H., INFLUENCE OF INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION AND OTHER FACTORS ON DISTRIBUTION OF BARNACLE CHTHAMALUS STELLATUS, ECOLOGY 42: 710 (1961). · DOI
- CRAMER, N.F., INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION, PREDATION AND SPECIES DIVERSITY - COMMENT, JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY 34: 289 (1972). · DOI
- CROKER, R.A., NICHE DIVERSITY IN 5 SYMPATRIC SPECIES OF INTERTIDAL AMPHIPODS (CRUSTACEA - HAUSTORIIDAE), ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS 37: 173 (1967). · DOI
- CULVER, D.C., ECOLOGY 51: 949 (1970). · DOI
- CULVER, D.C., NICHE ANALYSIS OF COLORADO ANTS, ECOLOGY 53: 126 (1972). · DOI
- DAWSON, N, A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE ECOLOGY OF 8 SPECIES OF FENLAND CARABIDAE (COLEOPTERA), JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY 34: 299 (1965). · DOI
- DAYTON, P.K., ROLE OF BIOLOGICAL DISTURBANCE IN MAINTAINING DIVERSITY IN DEEP SEA, DEEP-SEA RESEARCH 19: 199 (1972).
- DIAMOND, J.M., ECOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF ISLAND COLONIZATION BY SOUTHWEST PACIFIC BIRDS, .1. TYPES OF NICHE SHIFTS, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 67: 529 (1970).
- 10.1126/science.179.4075.759 · DOI
- DODDS, D.G., J WILDLIFE MANAGE 24: 52 (1960). · DOI
- EDINGTON, J.M., SPATIAL PATTERNS AND HABITAT PARTITION IN BREEDING BIRDS OF AN UPLAND WOOD, JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY 41: 331 (1972). · DOI
- FIENBERG, S.E., ANALYSIS OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL CONTINGENCY TABLES, ECOLOGY 51: 419 (1970). · DOI
- FLEMING, T.H., 3 CENTRAL-AMERICAN BAT COMMUNITIES - STRUCTURE, REPRODUCTIVE-CYCLES, AND MOVEMENT PATTERNS, ECOLOGY 53: 555 (1972). · DOI
- Gause G. F. Struiggle for Existence (1934). · DOI
- GIBSON, R.N., VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION AND FEEDING RELATIONSHIPS OF INTERTIDAL FISH ON ATLANTIC COAST OF FRANCE, JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY 41: 189 (1972). · DOI
- GRANT, P.R., ANNU REV ECOL SYST 3: 79 (1972). · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1972.tb00690.x · DOI
- GREEN, R.H., MULTIVARIATE STATISTICAL APPROACH TO HUTCHINSONIAN NICHE - BIVALVE MOLLUSCS OF CENTRAL CANADA, ECOLOGY 52: 543 (1971). · DOI
- GRIFFIN, DJG, ECOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION OF GRAPSID AND OCYPODID SHORE CRABS (CRUSTACEA-BRACHYURA) IN TASMANIA, JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY 40: 597 (1971). · DOI
- HAIGH, J, CAN THERE BE MORE PREDATORS THAN PREY, THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY 3: 290 (1972). · DOI
- HAIRSTON, N.G., COMMUNITY STRUCTURE, POPULATION CONTROL, AND COMPETITION, AMERICAN NATURALIST 94: 421 (1960). · DOI · Paper page
- HAIRSTON, N.G., ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS 19: 47 (1949). · DOI
- HAIRSTON, N.G., OBSERVATIONS ON THE ECOLOGY OF PARAMECIUM, WITH COMMENTS ON THE SPECIES PROBLEM, EVOLUTION 12: 440 (1958). · DOI
- HAMILTON, T.H., CONDOR 64: 40 (1962). · DOI
- HAMMER, U.T., SEASONAL SUCCESSION AND CONGENERIC ASSOCIATIONS OF DIAPTOMUS SPP (COPEPODA) IN SOME SASKATCHEWAN PONDS, LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY 13: 476 (1968). · DOI
- HARPER, J.L., BROOKHAVEN SYMPOSIUM IN BIOLOGY 22: 48 (1969).
- HEATWOLE, H, ECOLOGY OF 3 SYMPATRIC SPECIES OF PARASITIC INSECTS OF THE GENUS MEGARHYSSA (HYMENOPTERA, ICHNEUMONIDAE), ECOLOGY 46: 140 (1965). · DOI
- HELLER, H.C., ALTITUDINAL ZONATION OF CHIPMUNKS (EUTAMIAS) - ENERGY BUDGETS, ECOLOGY 52: 424 (1971). · DOI
- HESPENHEIDE, H.A., FOOD PREFERENCE AND EXTENT OF OVERLAP IN SOME INSECTIVOROUS BIRDS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO TYRANNIDAE, IBIS 113: 59 (1971). · DOI
- HILLMAN, P.E., HABITAT SPECIFICITY IN 3 SYMPATRIC SPECIES OF AMEIVA (REPTILIA - TEIIDAE), ECOLOGY 50: 476 (1969). · DOI
- HOLLING, C.S., CANADIAN ENTOMOLOGIST 91: 385 (1959). · DOI
- HOLLING, C.S., MEMOIRS OF THE ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF CANADA 98: 5 (1966).
- HOLMES, R.T., FOOD OVERLAP AMONG COEXISTING SANDPIPERS ON NORTHERN ALASKAN TUNDRA, SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY 17: 305 (1968). · DOI
- HORN, E.G., FOOD COMPETITION AMONG CELLULAR SLIME MOLDS (ACRASIEAE), ECOLOGY 52: 475 (1971). · DOI
- HUEY R.B. THESIS U TEXAS (1969).
- HURLBUTT, H.W., COEXISTENCE AND ANATOMICAL SIMILARITY IN 2 GENERA OF MITES VEIGAIA AND ASCA, SYSTEMATIC ZOOLOGY 17: 261 (1968). · DOI
- HUTCHINSON, G.E., HOMAGE TO SANTA-ROSALIA OR WHY ARE THERE SO MANY KINDS OF ANIMALS, AMERICAN NATURALIST 93: 145 (1959). · DOI
- INGER, R.F., TEMPERATURE RESPONSES AND ECOLOGICAL RELATIONS OF 2 BORNEAN LIZARDS, ECOLOGY 40: 127 (1959). · DOI
- INGER, R.F., ECOLOGICAL AND COMPETITIVE RELATIONS AMONG 3 SPECIES OF FROGS (GENUS RANA), ECOLOGY 47: 746 (1966). · DOI
- ISTOCK, C, DISTRIBUTION COEXISTENCE AND COMPETITION OF WHIRLIGIG BEETLES, EVOLUTION 20: 211 (1966). · DOI
- JAEGER, R.G., COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION AS A FACTOR INFLUENCING DISTRIBUTIONS OF 2 SPECIES OF TERRESTRIAL SALAMANDERS, ECOLOGY 52: 632 (1971). · DOI
- JARMAN, P.J., DIETS OF LARGE MAMMALS IN WOODLAND AROUND LAKE KARIBA, RHODESIA, OECOLOGIA 8: 157 (1971). · DOI
- JENNI, D.A., A STUDY OF ECOLOGY OF 4 SPECIES OF HERONS DURING BREEDING SEASON AT LAKE ALICE ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA, ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS 39: 245 (1969). · DOI
- JOHNSTON, D.W., NICHE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG SOME DECIDUOUS FOREST FLYCATCHERS, AUK 88: 796 (1971). · DOI
- KEAST, A, BIOTROPICA 2: 61 (1970). · DOI
- KING, C.E., SOME ASPECTS OF ECOLOGY OF PSAMMOLITTORAL NEMATODES IN NORTHEASTERN GULF OF MEXICO, ECOLOGY 43: 515 (1962). · DOI
- KOHN, A.J., THE ECOLOGY OF CONUS IN HAWAII, ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS 29: 47 (1959). · DOI
- KOHN, A.J., MICROHABITATS ABUNDANCE AND FOOD OF CONUS ON ATOLL REEFS IN MALDIVE AND CHAGOS ISLANDS, ECOLOGY 49: 1046 (1968). · DOI
- KOHN, A.J., DIVERSITY, UTILIZATION OF RESOURCES, AND ADAPTIVE RADIATION IN SHALLOW-WATER MARINE INVERTEBRATES OF TROPICAL OCEANIC ISLANDS, LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY 16: 332 (1971). · DOI
- KOPLIN, J.R., HABITAT OVERLAP AND COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION IN VOLES (MICROTUS), AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 80: 494 (1968). · DOI
- KUNZ, T.H., RESOURCE UTILIZATION - TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL COMPONENTS OF BAT ACTIVITY IN CENTRAL IOWA, JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 54: 14 (1973). · DOI
- LANCIANI, C.A., RESOURCE PARTITIONING IN SPECIES OF WATER MITE GENUS EYLAIS, ECOLOGY 51: 338 (1970). · DOI
- LEVIN, S.A., COMMUNITY EQUILIBRIA AND STABILITY, AND AN EXTENSION OF COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION PRINCIPLE, AMERICAN NATURALIST 104: 413 (1970). · DOI
- LIM, B.L., DISTRIBUTION, RELATIVE ABUNDANCE, FOOD HABITS, AND PARASITE PATTERNS OF GIANT RATS (RATTUS) IN WEST MALAYSIA, JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 51: 730 (1970). · DOI
- LLOYD, M, PERIODICAL CICADA PROBLEM .2. EVOLUTION, EVOLUTION 20: 466 (1966). · DOI
- LOTKA, A.J., JOURNAL OF THE WASHINGTON ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 22: 461 (1932).
- MACARTHUR, R.H., LIMITING SIMILARITY CONVERGENCE AND DIVERGENCE OF COEXISTING SPECIES, AMERICAN NATURALIST 101: 377 (1967). · DOI · Paper page
- MACARTHUR, R.H., ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AFFECTING BIRD SPECIES DIVERSITY, AMERICAN NATURALIST 98: 387 (1964). · DOI
- MACARTHUR, R.H., PATTERNS OF SPECIES DIVERSITY, BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PHILOSOPHICAL SOCIETY 40: 510 (1965). · DOI
- MACARTHUR, R.H., POPULATION ECOLOGY OF SOME WARBLERS OF NORTHEASTERN CONIFEROUS FORESTS, ECOLOGY 39: 599 (1958). · DOI
- MAGNUM, C.P., LIMNOL OCEANOGR 9: 12 (1964). · DOI
- MAITLAND, P.S., THE FEEDING RELATIONSHIPS OF SALMON, TROUT, MINNOWS, STONE LOACH AND 3-SPINED STICKLEBACKS IN THE RIVER ENDRICK, SCOTLAND, JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY 34: 109 (1965). · DOI
- MAY, R.M., NICHE OVERLAP AS A FUNCTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL VARIABILITY, PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 69: 1109 (1972).
- May R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (1973). · DOI
- MAYR, E, IBIS 115: 432 (1973).
- MCNAB, B.K., STRUCTURE OF TROPICAL BAT FAUNAS, ECOLOGY 52: 352 (1971). · DOI
- MCNAB, B.K., ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF BERGMANNS RULE, ECOLOGY 52: 845 (1971). · DOI
- MEDICA, P.A., BULLETIN OF THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES 66: 251 (1967).
- MENGE, B.A., COMPETITION FOR FOOD BETWEEN 2 INTERTIDAL STARFISH SPECIES AND ITS EFFECT ON BODY SIZE AND FEEDING, ECOLOGY 53: 635 (1972). · DOI
- Menge, J. L., Ecological Monographs 44: 189 (1974). · DOI
- MILLER, R.S., ADVANCES IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH 4: 1 (1967). · DOI
- MILLER, R.S., ECOLOGY + DISTRIBUTION OF POKET GOPHERS ( GEOMYIDAE ) IN COLORADO, ECOLOGY 45: 256 (1964). · DOI
- MILSTEAD, W.W., TEXAS JOURNAL OF SCIENCE 9: 410 (1957).
- 10.1126/science.136.3512.262 · DOI
- MOSQUIN, T, COMPETITION FOR POLLINATORS AS A STIMULUS FOR EVOLUTION OF FLOWERING TIME, OIKOS 22: 398 (1971). · DOI
- NEVO, E, COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION BETWEEN INSULAR LACERTA SPECIES (SAURIA, LACERTIDAE) - NOTES ON EXPERIMENTAL INTRODUCTIONS, OECOLOGIA 10: 183 (1972). · DOI
- NEWTON, I, ADAPTIVE RADIATION AND FEEDING ECOLOGY OF SOME BRITISH FINCHES, IBIS 109: 33 (1967). · DOI
- OLNEY, PJS, T C INT UNION GAME B 6: 309 (1963).
- ONEILL, R.V., NICHE SEGREGATION IN 7 SPECIES OF DIPLOPODS, ECOLOGY 48: 983 (1967). · DOI
- ORIANS, G.H., ECOLOGY 50: 930 (1969). · DOI
- PAINE, R.T., FOOD WEB COMPLEXITY AND SPECIES DIVERSITY, AMERICAN NATURALIST 100: 65 (1966). · DOI · Paper page
- PAINE, R.T., TROPHIC RELATIONSHIPS OF 8 SYMPATRIC PREDATORY GASTROPODS, ECOLOGY 44: 63 (1963). · DOI
- PIANKA, E.R., SYMPATRY OF DESERT LIZARDS (CTENOTUS) IN WESTERN-AUSTRALIA, ECOLOGY 50: 1012 (1969). · DOI
- PRICE, P.W., CHARACTERISTICS PERMITTING COEXISTENCE AMONG PARASITOIDS OF A SAWFLY IN QUEBEC, ECOLOGY 51: 445 (1970). · DOI
- PRICE, P.W., PARASITOIDS UTILIZING SAME HOST - ADAPTIVE NATURE OF DIFFERENCES IN SIZE AND FORM, ECOLOGY 53: 190 (1972). · DOI
- PULLIAM, H.R., FEEDING ECOLOGY OF 5 SYMPATRIC FINCH SPECIES, ECOLOGY 52: 557 (1971). · DOI
- PUTWAIN, P.D., STUDIES IN DYNAMICS OF PLANT POPULATIONS .3. INFLUENCE OF ASSOCIATED SPECIES ON POPULATIONS OF RUMEX-ACETOSA L AND R-ACETOSELLA L IN GRASSLAND, JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY 58: 251 (1970). · DOI
- RAND, A.S., ATAS DO SIMPOSIO SOBRE A BIOTA AMAZONICA 5: 73 (1967).
- RAND, A.S., ECOLOGICAL DISTRIBUTION IN ANOLINE LIZARDS OF PUERTO-RICO, ECOLOGY 45: 745 (1964). · DOI
- RESCIGNO, A, ON COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION PRINCIPLES, BULLETIN OF MATHEMATICAL BIOPHYSICS 27: 85 (1965). · DOI
- RESCIGNO, A, STRUGGLE FOR LIFE .2. 3 COMPETITORS, BULLETIN OF MATHEMATICAL BIOPHYSICS 30: 291 (1968). · DOI
- REYNOLDSON, T. B., JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY 39: 599 (1970). · DOI
- RICKLEFS, R.W., SPECIES DIVERSITY OF EUGLOSSA IN PANAMA, ECOLOGY 50: 713 (1969). · DOI
- RICKLEFS, R.E., TEMPORAL COMPONENT OF DIVERSITY AMONG SPECIES OF BIRDS, EVOLUTION 20: 235 (1966). · DOI
- ROOT, R.B., NICHE EXPLOITATION PATTERN OF BLUE-GRAY GNATCATCHER, ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS 37: 317 (1967). · DOI
- ROSENZWEIG, M.L., POPULATION ECOLOGY OF DESERT RODENT COMMUNITIES - HABITATS AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLEXITY, ECOLOGY 50: 558 (1969). · DOI
- ROSS, H.H., PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL COEXISTENCE INDICATED BY LEAFHOPPER POPULATIONS, EVOLUTION 11: 113 (1957). · DOI
- ROUGHGARDEN, J, EVOLUTION OF NICHE WIDTH, AMERICAN NATURALIST 106: 683 (1972). · DOI
- Roughgarden, J., Theoretical Population Biology 5: 163 (1974). · DOI
- SANDERCOCK, G. A., LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY 12: 97 (1967). · DOI
- 10.1126/science.163.3874.1419 · DOI
- SANDS, W.A., ENTOMOLOGIA EXPT APP 4: 277 (1961). · DOI
- SANDS, W.A., TERMITE DISTRIBUTION IN MAN-MODIFIED HABITATS IN WEST-AFRICA, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO SPECIES SEGREGATION IN THE GENUS TRINERVITERMES (ISOPTERA, TERMITIDAE, NASUTITERMITINAE), JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY 34: 557 (1965). · DOI
- SCHOENER, T.W., SIZE PATTERNS IN WEST INDIAN ANOLIS LIZARDS .2. CORRELATIONS WITH SIZES OF PARTICULAR SYMPATRIC SPECIES - DISPLACEMENT AND CONVERGENCE, AMERICAN NATURALIST 104: 155 (1970). · DOI
- SCHOENER, T.W., MODELS OF OPTIMAL SIZE FOR SOLITARY PREDATORS, AMERICAN NATURALIST 103: 277 (1969). · DOI
- SCHOENER, T.W., AM NAT 101: 207 (1968).
- SCHOENER, T.W., ANNU REV ECOL SYST 2: 369 (1971). · DOI
- SCHOENER, T.W., BREVIORA 368: 1 (1970).
- SCHOENER, T.W., BREVIORA 375: 1 (1971).
- SCHOENER, T.W., ANOLIS LIZARDS OF BIMINI - RESOURCE PARTITIONING IN A COMPLEX FAUNA, ECOLOGY 49: 704 (1968). · DOI
- SCHOENER, T.W., NONSYNCHRONOUS SPATIAL OVERLAP OF LIZARDS IN PATCHY HABITATS, ECOLOGY 51: 408 (1970). · DOI
- SCHOENER, T.W., THE EVOLUTION OF BILL SIZE DIFFERENCES AMONG SYMPATRIC CONGENERIC SPECIES OF BIRDS, EVOLUTION 19: 189 (1965). · DOI
- SCHOENER, T.W., POPULATION-GROWTH REGULATED BY INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION FOR ENERGY OR TIME - SOME SIMPLE REPRESENTATIONS, THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY 4: 56 (1973). · DOI
- SHEPPARD, D.H., COMPETITION BETWEEN 2 CHIPMUNK SPECIES (EUTAMIAS), ECOLOGY 52: 320 (1971). · DOI
- SHEPPE, W, CANADIAN FIELD-NATURALIST 81: 81 (1967). · DOI
- SNOW, B.K., FEEDING ECOLOGY OF TANAGERS AND HONEYCREEPERS IN TRINIDAD, AUK 88: 291 (1971). · DOI
- SNOW, B.K., FEEDING NICHES OF HUMMINGBIRDS IN A TRINIDAD VALLEY, JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY 41: 471 (1972). · DOI
- Price D. J. Little Science Big Science (1963). · DOI
- STONE, J.H., CHAETOGNATHA COMMUNITY OF AGULHAS CURRENT . ITS STRUCTURE AND RELATED PROPERTIES, ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS 39: 433 (1969). · DOI
- STORER, R.W., SEXUAL DIMORPHISM AND FOOD HABITS IN 3 NORTH AMERICAN ACCIPITERS, AUK 83: 423 (1966). · DOI
- STROBECK, C, N SPECIES COMPETITION, ECOLOGY 54: 650 (1973). · DOI
- TERBORGH, J, WILSON BULLETIN 82: 29 (1970).
- TINBERGEN, L, ARCHIVES NEERLANDAISES DE ZOOLOGIE 13: 265 (1960). · DOI
- TINKLE, D.W., TULANE STUDIES IN ZOOLOGY 6: 3 (1958).
- UECKERT, D.N., DIETARY OVERLAP OF GRASSHOPPERS ON SANDHILL RANGELAND IN NORTHEASTERN COLORADO, OECOLOGIA 8: 276 (1971). · DOI
- VANCE, R.R., COMPETITION AND MECHANISM OF COEXISTENCE IN 3 SYMPATRIC SPECIES OF INTERTIDAL HERMIT CRABS, ECOLOGY 53: 1062 (1972). · DOI
- 10.1126/science.147.3655.250 · DOI
- YOUNG, A.M., COMMUNITY ECOLOGY OF SOME TROPICAL RAIN-FOREST BUTTERFLIES, AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 87: 146 (1972). · DOI
- ZARET, T.M., COMPETITION IN TROPICAL STREAM FISHES - SUPPORT FOR COMPETITIVE EXCLUSION PRINCIPLE, ECOLOGY 52: 336 (1971). · DOI
- Schoener, T. W., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 71: 4169 (1974).
- Schoener, T. W., Theoretical Population Biology 6: 265 (1974). · DOI
- Schoener, T. W., American Naturalist 108: 332 (1974). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,010
Borcherding, J., Heubel, K. U., & Storm, S. (2019) · Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries · doi:10.1007/s11160-019-09567-x · Cited by 24
“Thus, defining the limits of niche separation at which species can stably coexist is the major aim and challenge for studies dealing with resource partitioning (Schoener 1974).”
BackgroundBalčiauskas, L., Skipitytė, R., Balčiauskienė, L., & Jasiulionis, M. (2019) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5144 · Cited by 20
“, 2013), or via dietary separation of species with similar requirements, that is, resource partitioning (Calandra et al., 2015; Dueser & Shuggart, 1979; Meserve, 1981; Schoener, 1974; Symes, Wilson, Woodborne, Shaikh, & Scantlebury, 2013).”
BackgroundNovel habitat causes a shift to diurnal activity in a nocturnal species
Doody, J., McHenry, C., Rhind, D., & Clulow, S. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36384-2 · Cited by 20
Wu, Z., Zhang, X.-M., Dromard, C., Tweedley, J., & Loneragan, N. (2018) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-018-3747-0 · Cited by 20
“42 43 INTRODUCTION 44 The coexistence of similar fish species in the same habitat is often facilitated by the 45 partitioning of resources in different dimensions such as food, habitat and time (Pianka, 46 1973; Schoener, 1974; Ross, 1986).”
BackgroundNagelkerken, I., Goldenberg, S., Coni, E. O., & Connell, S. (2018) · Science of the Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.168 · Cited by 20
Choudhary, S., Choudhury, B. C., & Gopi, G. V. (2018) · Aquatic conservation · doi:10.1002/aqc.2911 · Cited by 20
Zhukov, O., Kunah, O., Dubinina, Y. Y., & Novikova, V. (2018) · doi:10.2478/foecol-2018-0002 · Cited by 20
“It is also important to note that, at some spatial levels, interspecies interactions play an important role in the structuring of species complexes (Schoener, 1974; Wilson and Habiba, 1995; Belyea and Lancaster, 1999; Zhukov and Gubanova, 2015).”
BackgroundTiedemann, M., Fock, H. O., Brehmer, P., Döring, J., & Möllmann, C. (2017) · Fisheries Oceanography · doi:10.1111/fog.12224 · Cited by 28
“Niche partitioning is based on the concept that organisms outcompete competitors by diminishing resources below a competitor’s survival threshold leading to a diversification in habitat choice (Schoener, 1974).”
Backgroundde Albernaz, T. L., Secchi, E., de Oliveira, L. D., & Botta, S. (2017) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-016-2950-0 · Cited by 20
“The variation in the use of resources may occur along spatial, trophic, and temporal dimensions (Hutchinson, 1957; Schoener, 1974).”
BackgroundWarning, N. B., & Benedict, L. (2015) · doi:10.1676/14-170.1 · Cited by 20
“Population and community ecologists have described distinctive and varied ways in which organisms use space and resources (MacArthur 1972, Schoener 1974, Virzi et al. 2012).”
BackgroundBonato, K., & Fialho, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110999 · Cited by 20
“The partitioning of resources may be influenced by factors such as time, space and ontogeny [4,14,15].”
BackgroundKadye, W. T., & Booth, A. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093666 · Cited by 20
“This alternative hypothesis suggests that temporal partitioning is less important as animals tend to maximise on opportunity, and animals would therefore be able to exhibit flexibility in their diel activity [32].”
BackgroundIdentification of Cichlid Fishes from Lake Malawi Using Computer Vision
Joo, D., Kwan, Y., Song, J., Pinho, C., Hey, J., & Won, Y. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077686 · Cited by 19
Milazzo, M., Palmeri, A., Falcón, J. M., Badalamenti, F., García-Charton, J., Sinopoli, M., Chemello, R., & Brito, A. (2011) · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0485.2011.00447.x · Cited by 20
Ceneviva‐Bastos, M., Casatti, L., & Rossa‐Feres, D. D. C. (2010) · Zoologia (Curitiba) · doi:10.1590/s1984-46702010000200006 · Cited by 20
“According to niche and competition theories, the synchronized dislodgement among K. moenkhausii and Astyanax spp., observed here, could be interpreted as a resource partitioning mechanism that prevents competition (SCHOENER 1974).”
BackgroundMapping the habitat suitability of Ottelia species in Africa
Ngarega, B. K., Nzei, J., Saina, J. K., Halmy, M., Chen, J.-M., & Li, Z.-Z. (2022) · Plant Diversity · doi:10.1016/j.pld.2021.12.006 · Cited by 19
“In addition, taxa with similar distributional ranges generally utilize habitats differently to prevent complete overlap, reduce competition, and enable coexistence (Schoener, 1974).”
BackgroundDNA metabarcoding reveals broadly overlapping diets in three sympatric North American hummingbirds
Spence, A. R., Rankin, E. W. W., & Tingley, M. (2021) · Ornithology · doi:10.1093/ornithology/ukab074 · Cited by 19
“Compartmentalization through dietary niche partitioning can allow predator species to live in sympatry through specialization on specific prey items (Cody 1968, Schoener 1974, Guimerà et al.”
BackgroundResultSeki, Y., & Hayama, S. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11123398 · Cited by 19
Takada, H., Ohuchi, R., Watanabe, H., Yano, R., Miyaoka, R., Nakagawa, T., Zenno, Y., & Minami, M. (2020) · doi:10.1515/mammalia-2019-0150 · Cited by 19
Space use and temporal partitioning of sympatric Tasmanian devils and spotted‐tailed quolls
Andersen, G., Johnson, C. N., & Jones, M. E. (2020) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/aec.12865 · Cited by 19
Santos, R. D. C., Perroca, J. F., Costa, R., & Hirose, G. L. (2020) · doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2020.101218 · Cited by 19
Temporal shifts in intraspecific and interspecific diet variation among 3 stream predators
Falke, L. P., Henderson, J. S., Novak, M., & Preston, D. L. (2020) · Freshwater Science · doi:10.1086/707599 · Cited by 19
“Therelative rolesof intraspecific and interspecificnichevariation in shaping the structure and dynamics of communities remains unclear (May and MacArthur 1972, Schoener 1974, Lichstein et al. 2007, Violle et al. 2012, Hart et al. 2016).”
BackgroundNovel tri‐isotope ellipsoid approach reveals dietary variation in sympatric predators
Skinner, C., Mill, A. C., Newman, S. P., Newton, J., Cobain, M. R. D., & Polunin, N. V. C. (2019) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5779 · Cited by 27
“Resource partitioning often occurs among co‐occurring species to reduce inter‐ and intra‐ specific competition when resources are limited (Schoener, 1974).”
BackgroundRocha, R., López‐Baucells, A., Farneda, F. Z., Ferreira, D. F., Silva, I., Acácio, M., Palmeirim, J. M., & Meyer, C. F. J. (2019) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/cz/zoz042 · Cited by 21
Culbertson, K. A., & Herrmann, N. (2019) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-019-04466-1 · Cited by 19
“Niche partitioning facilitates the coexistence of competitors that divide available resources by separating along one or more niche dimensions (e.g., diet, habitat, activity time; Schoener 1974; Chesson 2000).”
BackgroundEvidence of temporal niche separation via low flowering time overlap in an old-field plant community
Jensen, A. M., Schamp, B., & Belleau, A. (2019) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-019-04386-0 · Cited by 19
“Another reason some flowering time studies do not produce evidence supporting limiting similarity is that variation in flowering time reflects one niche dimension, while other dimensions may also be important (Schoener 1974).”
BackgroundClimate‐driven build‐up of temporal isolation within a recently formed avian hybrid zone
Sirkiä, P. M., McFarlane, S. E., Jones, W. E., Wheatcroft, D. J., Ålund, M., Rybinski, J., & Qvarnström, A. (2017) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.13404 · Cited by 25
To graze or gorge: consistency and flexibility of individual foraging tactics in tits
Milligan, N., Radersma, R., Cole, E., & Sheldon, B. (2017) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12651 · Cited by 19
Khadka, K., Singh, N., Magar, K. T., & James, D. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2017.06.001 · Cited by 19
Hulsey, C. D., Zheng, J., Faircloth, B. C., Meyer, A., & Alfaro, M. E. (2017) · Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2017.05.027 · Cited by 18
“The habitat complexity that characterizes the rocky shores of Lake Malawi provides rich opportunities for niche partitioning and trophic specialization, and the mbuna do dominate and extensively exploit this habitat (MacArthur and Levins, 1964; Schoener, 1974; Ribbink et al., 1983; but see Martin and Genner, 2009).”
BackgroundGlobal ecological success of Thalassoma fishes in extreme coral reef habitats
Fulton, C. J., Wainwright, P. C., Hoey, A. S., & Bellwood, D. R. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2624 · Cited by 18
“…a higher aspect ratio pectoral fin than their congeners may have conferred enough competitive advantage for T. quinquevittatum to dominate within wave- swept habitats (cf. Schoener, 1974), particularly in oceanic locations that are likely to experience the most extreme levels of daily wave action.”
BackgroundSánchez-Hernández, J., Gabler, H., & Amundsen, P. (2016) · Hydrobiologia · doi:10.1007/s10750-015-2547-z · Cited by 19
“That said, habitat segregation may also be a key factor for food resource partitioning (e.g. Schoener, 1974; Jepsen et al., 1997; Yu & Lee, 2005), but resources can also be shared because species may adopt important adaptive features in order to reduce interspecific competition (e.g. Nakano et al.,…”
BackgroundHerkül, K., Lauringson, V., & Kotta, J. (2016) · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1306 · Cited by 19
“It has been speculated that sympatric populations of taxonomically closely related species rely on niche separation to reduce competition pressure that, in turn, facilitates long term co- existence (Schoener 1974, Pianka 1978, Fenchel and Kolding 1979, Kolding 1981).”
BackgroundRain-driven changes in fish dynamics: a switch from spatial to temporal segregation
Payne, N., van der Meulen, D. E., Suthers, I., Gray, C., Walsh, C., & Taylor, M. (2015) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps11285 · Cited by 19
Rendon, D., Whitehouse, M., Hulugalle, N., & Taylor, P. (2015) · Environmental Entomology · doi:10.1093/ee/nvu025 · Cited by 19
Kernaghan, G. (2013) · Symbiosis · doi:10.1007/s13199-013-0265-8 · Cited by 19
“REVIEWARTICLE Functional diversity and resource partitioning in fungi associated with the fine feeder roots of forest trees Gavin Kernaghan Received: 30 November 2013 /Accepted: 6 December 2013 /Published online: 22 December 2013 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013”
BackgroundContrasting diversity dynamics of phoretic mites and beetles associated with vertebrate carrion
Barton, P., Weaver, H., & Manning, A. (2013) · Experimental & applied acarology · doi:10.1007/s10493-013-9758-7 · Cited by 19
Gardiner, L. E., Somers, C., Martino, J., Parker, D. L., & Poulin, R. (2013) · doi:10.1002/jwmg.555 · Cited by 19
Differential use of vertical space by small mammals in the Monte Desert, Argentina
Albanese, S., Rodriguez, D., & Ojeda, R. (2011) · doi:10.1644/10-mamm-a-353.1 · Cited by 19
“Habitat and diet differentiation are proposed to be 2 important mechanisms of coexistence among small mammals (Schoener 1974).”
BackgroundSchoeman, M., & Waddington, K. J. (2011) · doi:10.1080/15627020.2011.11407502 · Cited by 19
“For example, such patterns can also be predicted if resources are very abundant because there is no competition for those resources (Schoener 1974).”
BackgroundEspinosa, F., Rivera-Ingraham, G., & García-Gómez, J. (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2011.06.005 · Cited by 19
Embryonic thermosensitivity and hatchling morphology differ between two coexisting lizards
Qu, Y.-F., Li, H., Gao, J.-F., & Ji, X. (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.actao.2011.04.006 · Cited by 19
“Species cannot coexist without a quantitative partitioning of resources along the axes of diet, space and time (Schoener, 1974; Partridge, 1978; Tokeshi, 1999; Gordon, 2000).”
BackgroundSoininen, J., Heino, J., Lappalainen, J., & Virtanen, R. (2011) · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.12.001 · Cited by 19
“001 (Hutchinson, 1959; MacArthur, 1972; Pianka, 1973; Schoener, 1974; Fox, 1981; Tokeshi, 1986).”
Ortêncio, H., Reis, N., & Minte-Vera, C. (2010) · Brazilian journal of biology = Revista brasleira de biologia · doi:10.1590/s1519-69842010000500004 · Cited by 19
Hábitos alimentares da ictiofauna do córrego Franco, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil
Brandão-Gonçalves, L., Oliveira, S. D., & Lima-Junior, S. E. (2010) · doi:10.1590/s1676-06032010000200001 · Cited by 19
Wang, Z., Zhang, M., Zhao, X., Xie, J., Peng, Y., Sheldon, F. H., & Zou, F. (2024) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/jav.03131 · Cited by 18
Linck, P., Palomares, F., Negrões, N., Rossa, M., Fonseca, C. M. D., Couto, A., & Carvalho, J. (2023) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-023-01749-0 · Cited by 18
“Therefore, to reduce the negative impacts of interspecific competition, species usually segregate into three main niche dimensions: trophic dimension, temporal dimension, and spatial dimension (Schoener 1974).”
Saldo, E. A., Jensen, A., Muthersbaugh, M., Butfiloski, J. W., Cantrell, J., Kilgo, J., Ruth, C., Yarrow, G., & Jachowski, D. (2023) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.4500 · Cited by 18
Too Close for Comfort? Isotopic Niche Segregation in New Zealand’s Odontocetes
Peters, K. J., Bury, S., Hinton, B., Betty, E., Casano-Bally, D., Parra, G., & Stockin, K. (2022) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology11081179 · Cited by 18
“Since interspecific competition only occurs when the resource that the species compete for is limited [23,24], studies are required to examine the extent of species competition by assessing prey abundance, fine-scale habitat use, foraging depths, and differences between local populations for odontocete species in New…”
BackgroundEvans, B., & Mortelliti, A. (2022) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.4027 · Cited by 18
Sörenson, E., Capo, É., Farnelid, H., Lindehoff, E., & Legrand, C. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.607601 · Cited by 18
“Broadly, the considered interactions may primarily be characterized by either coexistence, governed by resource partitioning (Sörenson et al., 2020), or by competition for energy and nutrients, which may lead to competitive exclusion (Schoener, 1974; Chesson, 2000).”
BackgroundMeta-analysis of light and circadian timekeeping in rodents
Lee, R., Tapia, A., Kaladchibachi, S., Grandner, M. A., & Fernandez, F. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.12.024 · Cited by 19
Perkins, M. W., Cloyed, C., & Eason, P. (2020) · Evolutionary Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10682-020-10078-6 · Cited by 18
“Interspecific niche partitioning is ubiquitous in all ecosystems and is a key component to understanding biodiversity and community structure (Schoener 1974; Pianka 1975; Hadi et al.”
BackgroundNiche dynamics of sympatric non‐breeding shearwaters under varying prey availability
Carvalho, P. C., & Davoren, G. (2020) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/ibi.12783 · Cited by 18
Wang, B., Xu, Y., Price, M., Yang, N., Liu, W., Zhu, B., Zhong, X., & Ran, J. (2020) · doi:10.1111/ibi.12842 · Cited by 18
The association between morphological and ecological characters across a global passerine radiation.
Kennedy, J. D., Marki, P. Z., Fjeldså, J., & Rahbek, C. (2019) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13169 · Cited by 18
“…a multitude of ecological and evolutionary processes, including adaptations for ecological segregation (Hutchinson, 1959; Pigot & Tobias, 2013; Schoener, 1974), its underlying mechanistic basis (Bock, 1966; Fjeldså, 1982), the formation and maintenance of communities (Miles & Ricklefs, 1984;…”
BackgroundSimbula, G., Luiselli, L., & Vignoli, L. (2019) · Zoologischer Anzeiger · doi:10.1016/j.jcz.2019.08.001 · Cited by 18
“An animal ecological niche is a multifactorial concept that can be subdivided into several dimensions (Pianka 1974; Schoener 1974a, 1982).”
BackgroundMeulenbroek, P., Stranzl, S., Ouéda, A., Sendzimir, J., Mano, K., Kaboré, I., Ouedraogo, R., & Melcher, A. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11195444 · Cited by 18
“The specific composition of communities is mainly influenced by the interaction between animals and their biotic and abiotic environments [17].”
BackgroundAmerican marten and fisher do not segregate in space and time during winter in a mixed‐forest system
Croose, E., Bled, F., Fowler, N. L., Beyer, D. E., & Belant, J. L. (2019) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5097 · Cited by 22
“For eco‐ logical and behavioral mechanisms, there are three major niche di‐ mensions along which differentiation may occur: space, time, and resources (Amarasekare, 2003; Schoener, 1974).”
BackgroundGrismer, L., Wood, P. L., Quah, E., Anuar, S., Ngadi, E., Izam, N. A. M., & Ahmad, N. (2018) · Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx067 · Cited by 18
Identifying critical interactions in complex competition dynamics between bean beetles
Kawatsu, K., & Kishi, S. (2018) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/oik.04103 · Cited by 18
An overview of understudied interaction types amongst large carnivores
Saggiomo, L., Picone, F., Esattore, B., & Sommese, A. (2017) · doi:10.1016/j.fooweb.2017.01.001 · Cited by 18
Bender, L. C., Rosas-Rosas, O. C., & Weisenberger, M. E. (2017) · Mammal Research · doi:10.1007/s13364-017-0318-0 · Cited by 18
“Differences in use of resources are thought to promote coexistence among sympatric carnivores (Schoener 1974; Sarmento et al. 2011; Sollmann et al. 2012).”
BackgroundMatley, J., Tobin, A., Simpfendorfer, C., Fisk, A., & Heupel, M. (2017) · doi:10.3354/meps11971 · Cited by 18
Ecological niche of coastal Beaufort Sea fishes defined by stable isotopes and fatty acids
Brewster, J. D., Giraldo, C., Swanson, H., Walkusz, W., Loewen, T. N., Reist, J. D., Stern, G. A., & Loseto, L. L. (2016) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps11887 · Cited by 27
Vignoli, L., Bissattini, A. M., & Luiselli, L. (2016) · doi:10.1111/bij.12906 · Cited by 18
Dietary partitioning between European roe deer and European brown hare
Sangiuliano, A., Lovari, S., & Ferretti, F. (2016) · European Journal of Wildlife Research · doi:10.1007/s10344-016-1023-z · Cited by 22
Watch out where you sleep: nocturnal sleeping behaviour of Bay Island lizards
Mohanty, N. P., Harikrishnan, S., & Vasudevan, K. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.1856 · Cited by 18
Cosham, J. A., Beazley, K., & McCarthy, C. (2016) · doi:10.1139/er-2015-0053 · Cited by 18
“Agonistic interactions are more likely when microhabitat and 279 resources are shared (Schoener 1983); understanding the factors characterizing species’ 280 respective niches and the amount of overlap between these is important.”
Gantchoff, M. G., & Belant, J. L. (2015) · Austral Ecology · doi:10.1111/aec.12303 · Cited by 14
Roswag, A., Becker, N. I., & Encarnação, J. A. (2015) · Population Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10144-015-0508-z · Cited by 18
“The multi-dimensional nature of the ecological niche means that resource partitioning occurs in several dimensions (Schoener 1974).”
BackgroundInfluentialAnthonysamy, W. J., Dreslik, M., Mauger, D., & Phillips, C. (2014) · Copeia · doi:10.1643/ce-13-100 · Cited by 18
“R ESOURCE partitioning is fundamental to community structuring (Schoener, 1968, 1974) and may arise from competition, predation, and physiological constraints, as well as complex interactions among these biological mechanisms (Toft, 1985).”
BackgroundSingh, G., & Agarwal, N. K. (2013) · doi:10.31018/jans.v5i2.334 · Cited by 18
“The habitat has been identified as one of the primary criteria on which many biological communities are organised (Schoener, 1974; Galacaoes et al., 1996).”
BackgroundAn investigation of enhanced mercury bioaccumulation in fish from offshore feeding
Chételat, J., Cloutier, L., & Amyot, M. (2013) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-013-1087-4 · Cited by 18
Contrasting patterns of trait‐based community assembly in lianas and trees from temperate Australia
Gallagher, R. V., & Leishman, M. R. (2012) · Oikos · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20025.x · Cited by 17
Adaptation and migration of a population between patches
Mirrahimi, S. (2012) · doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.753 · Cited by 18
“More precisely, from VolterraGauses competitive exclusion principle (see [18, 29]) it is known in theoretical biology that in a model with K limiting factors (as nutrients or geographic parameters) at most K distinct species can generally survive.”
MethodDivergence of the growth characteristics and longevity of coexisting Platycephalidae (Pisces)
Barnes, L., Gray, C., & Williamson, J. (2011) · doi:10.1071/mf11045 · Cited by 18
Ammunét, T., Heisswolf, A., Klemola, N., & Klemola, T. (2010) · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2009.01154.x · Cited by 18
“Competition theory states that shared resources, spatiotemporal co-occurrence and ecological similarity may all strengthen the competitive interactions between two species (Schoener, 1974).”
BackgroundA review of niche segregation across sympatric breeding seabird assemblages
Petalas, C., van Oordt, F., Lavoie, R. A., & Elliott, K. H. (2024) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/ibi.13310 · Cited by 27
Smith, K., Venter, J., Peel, M., Keith, M., & Somers, M. J. (2023) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.10380 · Cited by 17
Pan, X., Xie, Z.-J., Zhou, Z., Sun, X., Liu, D., Wu, D., Scheu, S., & Maraun, M. (2023) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109162 · Cited by 17
The Evolution of Competitive Ability
Sakarchi, J., & Germain, R. (2022) · American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/722234 · Cited by 17
“While theoretically it has been shown that an interspecific competition coefficient can be partitioned into each species’ effect and response (MacArthur 1972; Schoener 1974; May 1975; Ackermann and Doebeli 2004), to our knowledge, no study to date has attempted to do so empirically.”
BackgroundRioux, È., Pelletier, F., & St-Laurent, M.-H. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.8742 · Cited by 17
Guden, R. M., Derycke, S., & Moens, T. (2021) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2021.777425 · Cited by 16
Vollrath, S., Possamai, B., Schneck, F., Hoeinghaus, D., Albertoni, E., & Garcia, A. (2021) · Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom · doi:10.1017/s0025315421000242 · Cited by 17
“Understanding the processes and mechanisms controlling a species’ trophic niche and potential consequences for coexistence of phylogenetically, morphologically or functionally similar species is a long-standing problem in ecology (Schoener, 1974; Layman & Winemiller, 2005; Andrade et al., 2019).”
BackgroundCompetition and coexistence among terrestrial mammalian carnivores
Li, Z., Duo, L., Li, S., & Wang, T. (2021) · Biodiversity Science · doi:10.17520/biods.2020359 · Cited by 17
“的重要组成部分(Hutchinson, 1957, 1959)。时间也可 以看作一种限制性资源, 为食肉动物提供了一种行 为改变维度来促进共存(Halle, 2000)。动物的活动节 律是描述其时间生态位的主要方式, 是描述一天中 动物怎样分配活动时间的一种量化方式(Schoener, 1974); 活动节律受到生物机体内在调节与外部因 素的共同影响 , 以适应自然环境的周期性变化 (Kronfeld-Schor & Dayan, 2003)。目前有关食肉动物”
Phenotypic Clumping Decreases With Flock Richness in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks
Bangal, P., Sridhar, H., & Shanker, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2020.537816 · Cited by 17
“Competitive interactions are known to influence species distribution and coexistence (MacArthur, 1958; Connell, 1961; also reviewed in Schoener, 1974, 1983; Rusterholz, 1981) although evidence for this is not unequivocal (Park and Lloyd, 1955).”
Backgroundde Roos, A. (2020) · Ecological research · doi:10.1111/1440-1703.12174 · Cited by 17
“Despite this interest in stage-specific interactions Werner and Gilliam (1984) pointed out that also at that time ecologists were paradoxically paying in general less attention to the community consequences of the 10-fold variation in body size that is regularly observed within species than to the difference in body s…”
BackgroundJuárez-Camargo, P., Sosa-lopez, A., Torres‐Rojas, Y., Mendoza-Franco, E., & Aguíñiga-García, S. (2020) · doi:10.3856/vol48-issue4-fulltext-2453 · Cited by 17
“…low isotopic variability (standard deviation) indicated specialization in a particular trophic group (crustaceans), which indicated an ecological strategy for the optimization in the use of trophic resources, to reduce or avoid the level of intraspecific competition (Schoener, 1974; Werner, 1979).”
BackgroundRéale, D. J. F., Khelfaoui, M., Montiglio, P., & Gingras, Y. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03340-4 · Cited by 22
“This cluster also included publications on species competition [SCHOENER-TW (Schoener 1974)], on the diversity and organization of communities [CODY-ML, PIANKA-ER, HUTCHINSON-GE (Hutchinson 1959; Pianka 1973; Cody 1974)], and on population dynamics [MAY-RM (May 1974, 1976)].”
BackgroundRobinet, C., Merceron, G., CANDELA, A. M., & Marivaux, L. (2019) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyz194 · Cited by 21
“The differential exploitation of resources facilitates the coexistence of species (Schoener 1974).”
BackgroundResource Partitioning Among Woodpeckers in Northeastern Oregon
Evelyn, L. B., Peterson, S., & Thomas, J. H. W. (2018) · doi:10.2737/pnw-rn-444 · Cited by 17
“Theoretically, two species cannot coexist over time using the limited resources in identical ways because one eventually replaces the other (Schoener 1974).”
BackgroundFine-scale processes shape ecosystem service provision by an Amazonian hyperdominant tree species
Thomas, E., Atkinson, R., & Kettle, C. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29886-6 · Cited by 17
Rhoades, O. K., Best, R., & Stachowicz, J. (2018) · American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/698325 · Cited by 17
“Species vary broadly in their resource use within communities (Schoener 1974), and resource partitioning * Corresponding author; email: okrhoades@ucdavis.edu.”
BackgroundWill, A., & Kitaysky, A. (2018) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps12471 · Cited by 18
“…Stable isotope analysis · Habitat heterogeneity · Resource partitioning Mar Ecol Prog Ser 593: 247–260, 2018 Resource partitioning is considered to be an im - portant mechanism by which species are able to re - duce competition for common resources and co-exist (Schoener 1974, Finke & Snyder 2008).”
BackgroundPine, M., Wang, D., Porter, L., & Wang, K.-X. (2018) · doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsx197 · Cited by 17
“…followed by chorus-type SP1 between 20:00 and 23:00 h, then chorus-type SP3 with peak activity occurring between midnight and 02:00 h. Resource partitioning is a fundamental ecological concept for reducing competition between co-occurring species (Schoener, 1974; Hastings and Sirovic, 2015).”
BackgroundFunctional and numerical responses of shrews to competition vary with mouse density
Eckrich, C. A., Flaherty, E., & Ben-David, M. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0189471 · Cited by 17
Foraging niche separation in sympatric temperate-latitude fur seal species
Hoskins, A., Schumann, N., Costa, D., & Arnould, J. (2017) · doi:10.3354/meps12024 · Cited by 17
“The niche overlap index used in this study did not account for interspecific differences in prey size, a factor which can contribute to niche separation (Schoener 1974).”
MethodTemporal Segregation between Dung-Inhabiting Beetle and Fly Species
Sladecek, F., Segar, S., Lee, C., Wall, R., & Konvička, M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170426 · Cited by 17
“Temporal gradients have generally been considered to play a key role in species coexistence (by separating similar competitors), although habitat filtering is probably also involved [5, 7, 12].”
BackgroundSogawa, S., Sugisaki, H., Saito, H., Okazaki, Y., Ono, T., Shimode, S., & Kikuchi, T. (2016) · doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2015.12.010 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoener, T. W.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schoener, Thomas W.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1974-07-05
- Volume
- 185
- Issue
- 4145
- Pages
- 27-39
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2034690972
- Cited by
- 4,129
- References
- 141
- Citations by year
- 2026: 174 · 2025: 168 · 2024: 149 · 2023: 162 · 2022: 176 · 2021: 181 · 2020: 177 · 2019: 168 · 2018: 149 · 2017: 140 · 2016: 136 · 2015: 139 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 128 · 2012: 114
- FWCI
- 49.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- resource partitioning, ecological communities, interspecific competition, niche overlap, niche breadth, predation, reproductive isolation, phenotypic variability, species number, community theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review