The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wolf-Pack Buffer Zones as Prey Reservoirs
Abstract
In a declining herd, surviving deer inhabited overlapping edges of wolf-pack territories. There, wolves hunted little until desperate, in order to avoid fatal encounters with neighbors. Such encounters reduce wolf numbers and predation pressure and apparently allow surviving deer along territory edges to repopulate the area through dispersal of their prime, less vulnerable offspring into territory cores.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hunting grounds of the NR are used by multiple wolf packs, a situation that does not conform to the widely held conceptual model of distinct territorial boundaries with interstitial prey refuges that has been suggested on an empirical (Mech 1977) and theoretical (Lewis & Murray 1993) basis.”
From Landscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator–prey system (2007) · cites this paper as Mech 1977
Citations
Cites
White-Tailed Deer Migration and Its Role in Wolf Predation
Hoskinson, R. L., & Mech, L. D. (1976) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3799944 · Cited by 108
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- ERICKSON, A.B., MINN DEP CONSERV TEC 5: 65 (1961).
- HAWKINS, R.E., A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF WHITE-TAILED DEER, JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 34: 407 (1970). · DOI
- HAWKINS, R.E., DISPERSAL OF DEER FROM CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 35: 216 (1971). · DOI
- HICKERSON, H, MAN CULTURE ANIMALS: 43 (1965).
- MAHRENKE, P, JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 52: 630 (1971). · DOI
- MECH, L.D., SPACING AND POSSIBLE MECHANISMS OF POPULATION REGULATION IN WOLVES, AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST 12: 642 (1972).
- MECH, L.D., PRODUCTIVITY, MORTALITY, AND POPULATION TRENDS OF WOLVES IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA, JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 58: 559 (1977). · DOI
- MECH, L.D., NC52 US FOR SERV RES: 35 (1971).
- MECH, L.D., NC97 US FOR SERV RES: 2 (1973).
- MECH, L.D., P INT C GAME BIOL 11: 315 (1974).
- MECH, L.D., US NATL PARK SERV 7: 145 (1966).
- Mech, L. D., Proceedings of the 1975 Predation Symposium: 55 (1977).
- Murie, A., The Wolves of Mount McKinley, Fauna of the national parks of the United States, Fauna Series 5 121 (1944).
- NELSON M.E. THESIS U MINNESOTA (1977).
- PETERS, R.P., SCENT-MARKING IN WOLVES, AMERICAN SCIENTIST 63: 628 (1975).
- Pimlott, D. H., Wolf research study areas 1959-1965, Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario Department of Lands and Forests Research Report 87: 40 (1969).
- SEAL, U.S., BLOOD ANALYSES OF WOLF PUPS AND THEIR ECOLOGICAL AND METABOLIC INTERPRETATION, JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 56: 64 (1975). · DOI
- VANBALLENBERGHE, V, WOLF PACK KILLS ANOTHER WOLF, AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 90: 490 (1973). · DOI
- VANBALLENBERGHE, V, WEIGHTS, GROWTH, AND SURVIVAL OF TIMBER WOLF PUPS IN MINNESOTA, JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 56: 44 (1975). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wolves influence elk movements: Behavior shapes a trophic cascade in Yellowstone National Park
Fortin, D., Beyer, H. L., Boyce, M. S., Smith, D. W., Duchesne, T., & Mao, J. S. (2005) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/04-0953 · Cited by 1,351
“Avoidance among wolf packs creates buffer zones where ungulates may aggregate (Mech 1977, Lewis and Murray 1993).”
BackgroundAugustine, D. J., & McNaughton, S. J. (1998) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3801981 · Cited by 1,129
Wolves and the Ecology of Fear: Can Predation Risk Structure Ecosystems?
RIPPLE, W. J., & BESCHTA, R. L. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0755:wateof]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 813
“For example, in a wolf–ungulate system, ungulates may seek refuge by migrating to areas outside the core territories of wolves (migration) or survive longer outside the wolves’ core use areas (mortality) (Mech 1977).”
BackgroundClevenger, A. P., & Waltho, N. (2000) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.00099-085.x · Cited by 480
“For example, deer are known to keep to the periphery of wolf territories (Hoskinson & Mech 1976; Mech 1977) and re- duce their feeding effort when exposed to odors of wolves and other predator species (Muller-Schwarze 1972; Sullivan et al. 1985).”
BackgroundTrophic cascades among wolves, elk and aspen on Yellowstone National Park’s northern range
Ripple, W. J., Larsen, E. J., Renkin, R. A., & Smith, D. W. (2001) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00107-0 · Cited by 452
“When wolves were present, ungulate antipredator strategies may have included the avoidance of high wolf use areas (Mech, 1977; Roby, 1978; Allen, 1979; Edwards, 1983; Ferguson et al., 1988).”
BackgroundLandscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator–prey system
Kauffman, M. J., Varley, N., Smith, D. W., Stahler, D. R., MacNulty, D. R., & Boyce, M. S. (2007) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01059.x · Cited by 350
“Hunting grounds of the NR are used by multiple wolf packs, a situation that does not conform to the widely held conceptual model of distinct territorial boundaries with interstitial prey refuges that has been suggested on an empirical (Mech 1977) and theoretical (Lewis & Murray 1993) basis.”
Mineral nutrition and spatial concentrations of African ungulates
McNaughton, S. J. (1988) · Nature · doi:10.1038/334343a0 · Cited by 313
Scent-marking by male mammals: Cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates
Gosling, L. M., & Roberts, S. C. (2001) · Advances in the Study of Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(01)80007-3 · Cited by 411
Historic aspen recruitment, elk, and wolves in northern Yellowstone National Park, USA
Ripple, W. J., & Larsen, E. J. (2000) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00014-8 · Cited by 308
Ecological Constraints on Predation by Large Felids
Sunquist, M. E., & Sunquist, F. C. (1989) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4716-4_11 · Cited by 215
Hernández, L., & Laundré, J. W. (2005) · Wildlife Biology · doi:10.2981/0909-6396(2005)11[215:fitlof]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 251
“…a shift in habitat use when ungulates are faced with predation pressures from large predators such as wolves Canis lupus and pumas Puma concolor (Mech 1977, Edwards 1983, Stephens & Peterson 1984, Altendorf et al. 2001), and evidence of reduced diet quality has also been presented (Edwards…”
BackgroundModelling territoriality and wolf–deer interactions
Lewis, M. A., & Murray, J. D. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/366738a0 · Cited by 203
HABITAT SELECTION BY ELK BEFORE AND AFTER WOLF REINTRODUCTION IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK
MAO, J. S., BOYCE, M. S., SMITH, D. W., SINGER, F. J., VALES, D. J., VORE, J. M., & MERRILL, E. H. (2005) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1691:hsbeba]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 260
Calf Survival of Woodland Caribou in a Multi-Predator Ecosystem
Gustine, D. D., Parker, K. L., Lay, R. J., Gillingham, M. P., & Heard, D. C. (2006) · Wildlife Monographs · doi:10.2193/0084-0173(2006)165[1:csowci]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 192
“In areas where pack boundaries overlapped within a season and year, we assigned the lower RSF value to that pixel because of probable decreased vigilance by pack members in those areas and, subsequently, lower predation risk (Mech 1977, Rogers et al. 1980, Mech 1994).”
BackgroundWar Zones and Game Sinks in Lewis and Clark’s West
Martin, P. S., & Szuter, C. (1999) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97417.x · Cited by 170
“Wildlife biologists have found merit in Hickerson’s war zone hypothesis and employed it in modified form to account for deer survival in a “no-wolves’ land” between territories of adjoining packs (Mech 1977).”
BackgroundPalmer, M. S., Fieberg, J., Swanson, A., Kosmala, M., & Packer, C. (2017) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12832 · Cited by 181
Regulation of Population Density Due to Individual Differences and Patchy Environment
Łomnicki, A., & Łomnicki, A. (1980) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3544426 · Cited by 155
“The importance of space division between predators and prey was recently confirmed by an interesting field study on wolves and deer (Mech 1977).”
BackgroundThe scale-dependent impact of wolf predation risk on resource selection by three sympatric ungulates
Kittle, A. M., Fryxell, J. M., Desy, G. E., & Hamr, J. (2008) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-008-1051-9 · Cited by 130
“The presence of un-collared wolf packs adjacent to the study area might influence direct predation risk measures in peripheral quadrats; however, there tends to be an unoccupied ‘‘noman’s land’’ between neighbouring packs which should minimize this potential impact (Mech 1977).”
BackgroundBroughton, J. M. (2002) · World Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00438240220134269 · Cited by 146
“Given that all signals from local patches suggest foraging returns were declining across the entire occupational history of the mound, could the resurgence in deer use be reecting the increasing use of less-depleted deer patches located in the oak woodlands that extend far to the east of the site? Such distant patche…”
BackgroundCarnivore Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution
Buskirk, S. M., & Gittleman, J. (1989) · Springer US · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0855-3 · Cited by 153
Wolf and bear predation on white-tailed deer fawns in northeastern Minnesota
Kunkel, K. E., & Mech, L. D. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z94-207 · Cited by 133
Self-citationSpatial organization and food habits of jaguars (Panthera onca) in a floodplain forest
de Azevedo, F. C. C., & Murray, D. L. (2007) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2007.02.022 · Cited by 150
“It follows that, competition for food should be less pronounced in areas where individuals overlap, such that fewer prey would be killed in those areas than would be expected based on the availability of resources (Mech, 1977; Pierce et al., 2000).”
BackgroundClumping versus spacing out: Experiments on nest predation in fieldfares (Turdus pilaris)
Andersson, M., & Wiklund, C. (1978) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(78)90110-0 · Cited by 144
INFLUENCE OF VEGETATION, TOPOGRAPHY, AND ROADS ON COUGAR MOVEMENT IN SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
Dickson, B. G., Jenness, J., & Beier, P. (2005) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2193/0022-541x(2005)069 · Cited by 321
HOME RANGE ANALYSIS USING A MECHANISTIC HOME RANGE MODEL
Moorcroft, P. R., Lewis, M. A., & Crabtree, R. L. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1656:hrauam]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 150
Bump, J. K., Webster, C. R., Vucetich, J. A., Peterson, R. O., Shields, J. M., & Powers, M. D. (2009) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s10021-009-9274-0 · Cited by 135
What Cues Do Ungulates Use to Assess Predation Risk in Dense Temperate Forests?
Kuijper, D. P. J., Verwijmeren, M., Churski, M., Zbyryt, A., Schmidt, K., Jędrzejewska, B., & Smit, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084607 · Cited by 152
“As wolf packs tend to avoid intensive use of buffer zones, deer inhabiting those areas are predicted to experience lower predation pressure [66] and numbers can become higher at boundaries of wolf packs compared to the territory centers [66,67].”
Wolf Predation on Elk in Riding Mountain National Park, Manitoba
Carbyn, L. (1983) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3808155 · Cited by 131
What Are the Effects of Predators on Large Ungulate Populations?
Skogland, T. (1991) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545248 · Cited by 123
Diet shifts in moose due to predator avoidance
Edwards, J. (1983) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00379520 · Cited by 122
SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF MOUNTAIN LIONS: DOES A LAND-TENURE SYSTEM REGULATE POPULATION SIZE?
Pierce, B. M., Bleich, V. C., & Bowyer, R. T. (2000) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1533:soomld]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 108
Switalski, T. A. (2003) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z03-080 · Cited by 106
“Wolf buffer zones have been found to have higher deer survivorship (Hoskinson and Mech 1976; Mech 1977; Rogers et al. 1980; Lewis and Murray 1993) and provide refuge for coyotes (Berg and Chesness 1978; Fuller and Keith 1981; Arjo and Pletscher 1999).”
BackgroundDo wildlife passages act as prey-traps?
Little, S. J., Harcourt, R. G., & Clevenger, A. P. (2002) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(02)00059-9 · Cited by 122
“keeping to the periphery of wolf territories (Hoskinson and Mech, 1976; Mech, 1977).”
Theuerkauf, J., & Rouys, S. (2008) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.030 · Cited by 117
Spatio‐temporal dynamics in the response of woodland caribou and moose to the passage of grey wolf
Latombe, G., Fortin, D., & Parrott, L. (2013) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12108 · Cited by 107
Use of overlap zones among group-living primates: a test of the risk hypothesis
Wrangham, R., Crofoot, M., Lundy, R., & Gilby, I. (2007) · doi:10.1163/156853907782512092 · Cited by 105
“Third, if hostile interactions with neighboring groups involve a high risk of injury, this could lead to avoidance of overlap areas (Hickerson, 1965, 1970; Mech, 1977; Kelly, 2005).”
BackgroundKay, C. E. (1994) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/bf02734166 · Cited by 157
Varley, N., & Boyce, M. S. (2005) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.09.001 · Cited by 81
Horne, J. S., Garton, E. O., & Rachlow, J. (2008) · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.02.042 · Cited by 88
Recovery in complex ecosystems
O'Neill, R. (1998) · doi:10.1023/a:1009996332614 · Cited by 86
“Prey refugia are essential to the maintainance of many predator-prey systems, such as the wolf and deer ( Mech, 1977 ).”
BackgroundEmmering, Q. C., & Schmidt, K. A. (2011) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01869.x · Cited by 76
“Spatial heterogeneity in predation risk creates spatial refugia that can be potentially exploited by prey and consequently lower predator efficiency (Mech 1977; Fontaine & Martin 2006; Schmidt, Ostfeld & Smyth 2006; Schauber et al. 2009).”
BackgroundSchmidt, K. A., Ostfeld, R. S., & Smyth, K. N. (2006) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0340-9 · Cited by 86
“A similar example is played out by whitetailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) that occupy gaps that exist between adjacent wolf (Canis lupus) packs (Mech 1977; Lewis and Murray 1993).”
Antipredator strategies of caribou: dispersion along shorelines
Bergerud, A. T. (1985) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z85-199 · Cited by 82
Restoring landscapes of fear with wolves in the Scottish Highlands
Manning, A. D., Gordon, I. J., & Ripple, W. J. (2009) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2009.05.007 · Cited by 79
“The overlapping edges between pack territories, which are generally avoided by wolves, have also been shown to be have higher deer densities (Mech, 1977).”
BackgroundCommon and snow leopards share prey, but not habitats: competition avoidance by large predators?
Lovari, S., Minder, I., Ferretti, F., Mucci, N., Randi, E., & Pellizzi, B. (2013) · doi:10.1111/jzo.12053 · Cited by 79
Wolf-avoidance strategies of moose
Stephens, P. W., & Peterson, R. O. (1984) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.1984.tb01126.x · Cited by 78
Recolonizing wolves trigger a trophic cascade in Wisconsin ( USA )
Callan, R., Nibbelink, N. P., Rooney, T. P., Wiedenhoeft, J. E., & Wydeven, A. P. (2013) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12095 · Cited by 80
“Wolves are less likely to hunt in these buffer zones so as to avoid potentially fatal encounters with neighbouring wolf packs (Mech 1977).”
BackgroundBerger, J., Daneke, D. E., Johnson, J., & Berwick, S. (1983) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(83)90036-8 · Cited by 67
Predation risk and the functional response of elk–aspen herbivory
White, C. A., Feller, M. C., & Bayley, S. (2003) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(03)00119-1 · Cited by 106
Carbyn, L. N. (1982) · The Canadian field-naturalist · doi:10.5962/p.354810 · Cited by 72
Overlapping Species "Choice" by Italian Upper Pleistocene Predators
Stiner, M. (1992) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/204095 · Cited by 64
Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores
Sullivan, T. P., Nordstrom, L. O., & Sullivan, D. S. (1985) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf01012078 · Cited by 145
Use of predator odors as repellents to reduce feeding damage by herbivores
Sullivan, T. P., Nordstrom, L. O., & Sullivan, D. S. (1985) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/bf01012077 · Cited by 89
Coupled and complex: Human–environment interaction in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, USA
Bennett, D., & McGinnis, D. L. (2007) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.05.009 · Cited by 59
Scent-marking in free-ranging coyotes, Canis latrans
Barrette, C., & Messier, F. (1980) · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(80)80141-2 · Cited by 58
Pattern Formation in Ecological Communities
Levin, S. A. (1978) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2195-6_16 · Cited by 52
Eriksen, A., Wabakken, P., Zimmermann, B., Andreassen, H. P., Arnemo, J. M., Gundersen, H., Milner, J. M., Liberg, O., Linnell, J. D. C., Pedersen, H. C., et al. (2008) · Ecological Research · doi:10.1007/s11284-008-0525-x · Cited by 50
“…one might expect the moose cows to show anti-predator adaptations such as altered behavior and habitat use, as found in North American studies of wolf-ungulate relationships (Mech 1966, 1977; Peterson 1977; Edwards 1983; Stephens and Peterson 1984; Berger et al. 2001; Laundré et al. 2001).”
BackgroundWolf pack spacing: Howling as a territory-independent spacing mechanism in a territorial population
Harrington, F., & Mech, L. (1983) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/bf00343208 · Cited by 55
Self-citationMortality causes and survival estimates for adult female columbian black-tailed deer
Mcnay, R. S., & Voller, J. (1995) · doi:10.2307/3809126 · Cited by 55
Spatial interactions between sympatric carnivores: asymmetric avoidance of an intraguild predator
Grassel, S. M., Rachlow, J. L., & Williams, C. J. (2015) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1561 · Cited by 51
“White-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus; Mech 1977), elk (Cervus elaphus; Fortin et al. 2005), and coyotes (Arjo and Pletcher 1999) minimize risk of predation by avoiding areas used by wolves.”
BackgroundMelzheimer, J., Heinrich, S. K., Wasiolka, B., Mueller, R., Thalwitzer, S., Palmegiani, I., Weigold, A., Portas, R., Roeder, R., Krofel, M., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2002487117 · Cited by 54
“There are also sites visited disproportionally less frequently than others, such as territory overlaps of neighboring gray wolf packs, which were previously identified as providing naturally safe areas for wild ungulates (46).”
BackgroundSeabloom, E., & Richards, S. (2003) · doi:10.1890/02-0020 · Cited by 50
“However, territoriality is a common social behavior that can have large impacts on the distribution of herbivores and their prey by creating refuges along the peripheries of adjacent territories (Mech 1977, Robertson 1989).”
BackgroundLaliberte, A. S., & Ripple, W. J. (2003) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0994:weblac]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 46
“Keywords: historical ecology, Lewis and Clark, wildlife distribution, buffer zones, predation October 2003 / Vol. 53 No. 10 • BioScience 995 along the edges of wolf territories; wolves avoided those zones to reduce encounters with the neighboring packs (Mech 1977).”
BackgroundHale, P. (1982) · doi:10.1086/648386 · Cited by 49
Spatial ecology of large herbivore populations
Owen‐Smith, N. (2014) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00613.x · Cited by 50
Scaling up predator–prey dynamics using spatial moment equations
Barraquand, F., & Murrell, D. J. (2013) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12014 · Cited by 47
“Methods in Ecology and Evolution © 2013 British Ecological Society, Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4, 276–289 case they owe much to the territorial behaviour of predators Mech, 1977;Moorcroft &Lewis, 2006).”
BackgroundWolf number changes in Bieszczady National Park, Poland
Śmietana, W., & Wajda, J. (1997) · doi:10.4098/at.arch.97-26 · Cited by 46
Analysis of a model for wolf territories
Lewis, M. A., White, K. A. J., & Murray, J. D. (1997) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s002850050075 · Cited by 41
Bison and elk in the American Southwest: In search of the pristine
Truett, J. C. (1996) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/bf01204004 · Cited by 42
Flagel, D. G., Belovsky, G. E., & Beyer, D. E. (2015) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-015-3515-z · Cited by 48
Deer Distribution in Relation to Wolf Pack Territory Edges
Mech, L. D., Dawson, D. K., Peek, J. M., Korb, M., & Rogers, L. L. (1980) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3808381 · Cited by 38
“The data generally support the hypotheses that deer densities tend to he greater along wolf pack territory buffer zones than in territory centers (Hoskinson and Mech 1976; Mech 1977a,b; Nelson and Mech, unpubl. data).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationFactors influencing predation on juvenile ungulates and natural selection implications
Barber-Meyer, S. M., & Mech, L. D. (2008) · Wildlife Biology in Practice · doi:10.2461/wbp.2008.4.2 · Cited by 36
Self-citationThe scent of wolves: pyrazine analogs induce avoidance and vigilance behaviors in prey
Osada, K., Miyazono, S., & Kashiwayanagi, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00363 · Cited by 39
“However, urine is an important mode of chemical communication for the wolf (Peters and Mech, 1975; Mech, 1977).”
BackgroundInteraction theory in forest ecology and management
Leary, R. A. (1985) · Forestry sciences · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5151-8 · Cited by 35
“, deer herds occupying areas at the boundaries of wolf pack territories (Mech 1977; Rogers, et aI., 1980, Nelson and Mech 1981), ii) biochemical separation, e.”
BackgroundTórrez-Herrera, L. L., Davis, G., & Crofoot, M. (2020) · International journal of primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-019-00110-0 · Cited by 33
“…safe havens for prey species that may generate source-sink dynamics at the population level, e.g., wolf (Canis lupus) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) populations (Mech 1977; Mech et al. 1980) and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and red colobus monkey (Colobus badius) (Stanford 1995).”
BackgroundSpatial dynamics of lions and their prey along an environmental gradient
Ogutu, J. O., & Dublin, H. (2004) · African Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0141-6707.2004.00440.x · Cited by 31
Wolf-deer interactions: a mathematical model
White, K. A. J., Murray, J. D., & Lewis, M. A. (1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0046 · Cited by 33
The Interaction of Humans, Megaherbivores, and Habitats in the Late Pleistocene Extinction Event
Owen‐Smith, N. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-5202-1_3 · Cited by 34
Community consequences of foraging under fear
Teckentrup, L., Grimm, V., Kramer‐Schadt, S., & Jeltsch, F. (2018) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.05.015 · Cited by 30
Threat of predation: do ungulates behave aggressively towards different members of a coyote pack?
Gese, E. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z98-232 · Cited by 30
“Countering these tests by predators, ungulates have developed antipredator strategies and behaviors (Mech 1977; Geist 1982; Estes 1991; Nelson and Mech 1991).”
BackgroundThe scaling of geographic ranges: implications for species distribution models
Yackulic, C. B., & Ginsberg, J. R. (2015) · Landscape Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0333-y · Cited by 29
“individual movements, wolf sociality has been shown to create areas between pack home ranges where space use is orders of magnitude lower, deer survivorship is higher and rates of herbivory are much greater (Mech 1977; Lewis and Murray 1993).”
BackgroundCorlett, R. T. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-66877-8_7 · Cited by 32
Long-term Research on Wolves in the Superior National Forest
Mech, L. D. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85952-1_2 · Cited by 33
“We plotted these locations from October 1 through March 30 and April 1 through September 30 each year, and used minimum convex polygons (MCPs; Mohr 1947) to represent territories (Mech 1973, 1977b, 1986) .”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationWhite, P. J., Garrott, R. A., Cherry, S., Watson, F. G. R., Gower, C. N., Becker, M. S., & Meredith, E. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/s1936-7961(08)00221-2 · Cited by 18
TILSON, R. L., & Tenaza, R. R. (1982) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.1350020404 · Cited by 25
Schmidt, K. A., & Schauber, E. M. (2007) · Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1560/ijee.53.3.389 · Cited by 18
“Likewise, Mech (1977) 178 noted that wolves form stable territories that are separated by buffer zones up to 2 km wide, into 179 which wolves rarely venture to avoid antagonistic interactions with neighboring packs.”
BackgroundIntense or Spatially Heterogeneous Predation Can Select against Prey Dispersal
Barraquand, F., & Murrell, D. J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028924 · Cited by 19
“This should equally be expected in territorial mammalian predators that have dens, such as in canids where a negative spatial correlation with their ungulate prey has previously been observed [30] and confirmed by modeling [31].”
ResultA differential game theoretical analysis of mechanistic models for territoriality
Hamelin, F. M., & Lewis, M. A. (2009) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s00285-009-0316-1 · Cited by 38
Human disturbance alters the predation rate of moose in the Athabasca oil sands
Neilson, E., & Boutin, S. (2017) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1913 · Cited by 19
THE PROBLEMS OF OVERPOPULATION OF DEER IN NORTH AMERICA
Klein, D. R. (1981) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385280-9.50013-5 · Cited by 14
Ethnohistory: A Choice between Being Anthropology or Being Nothing
Abler, T. (1982) · doi:10.1525/cia.1982.4.1.45 · Cited by 17
Seasonal Habitat Use by Nubian Ibex (Capra Nubiana) Evaluated with Behavioral Indicators
Tadesse, S., & Kotler, B. P. (2011) · Israel Journal of Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1560/ijee.57.3.223 · Cited by 17
Territory boundary avoidance as a stabilizing factor in wolf-deer interactions
Taylor, R. J., & Pekins, P. J. (1991) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(91)90031-a · Cited by 13
Possible Effects of Forestry on Inland Waters of Tasmania: A Review
Michaelis, F. (1984) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892900014703 · Cited by 16
Unger, D. E., Keenlance, P., Kohn, B. E., & Anderson, E. M. (2009) · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85952-1_11 · Cited by 16
“Previous research has shown that wolf territories often overlap (Van Ballenberghe et al. 1975 ; Peterson 1977 ; Fritts and Mech 1981 ; Nelson and Mech 1981 ; Peterson et al. 1984 ; Jeþdrzejewski et al. 2007) . This tendency also occurred in northwestern Wisconsin and east-central Minnesota (Gehring 1995 ; Shelley and…”
ResultConsumption of Carnivores by Wolves: A Worldwide Analysis of Patterns and Drivers
Martins, I. M., Krofel, M., Mota, P. G., & Álvares, F. (2020) · Diversity · doi:10.3390/d12120470 · Cited by 19
“Wolves usually have higher risks of fatal encounters in the edges of their territories because in these “buffer zones” the chance to find a member of a neighborhood wolf pack is higher and these situations can lead to lethal competition interactions for territory (Mech 1977; Mech, 1994).”
BackgroundMaking the Most of Radio Tracking—A Summary of Wolf Studies in Northeastern Minnesota
Mech, L. D. (1980) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-024928-5.50012-9 · Cited by 16
Self-citationTakada, H. (2020) · Mammalian Biology · doi:10.1007/s42991-019-00005-w · Cited by 18
“2010), are often forced to use safer habitats with poorer forage instead of riskier habitats with richer forage (Mech 1977; Edwards 1983; Altendorf et al.”
BackgroundOlson, L. O., Deelen, T. R. V., Storm, D. J., & Crimmins, S. M. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2021-0024 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Mech, L. D.
- Affiliations
- United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mech, L. David
- ORCID
- Mech, L. David
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1977-10-21
- Volume
- 198
- Issue
- 4314
- Pages
- 320-321
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2102080812
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- territorial overlap, offspring dispersal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review