The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wolf-Pack Buffer Zones as Prey Reservoirs
Abstract
In a declining herd, surviving deer inhabited overlapping edges of wolf-pack territories. There, wolves hunted little until desperate, in order to avoid fatal encounters with neighbors. Such encounters reduce wolf numbers and predation pressure and apparently allow surviving deer along territory edges to repopulate the area through dispersal of their prime, less vulnerable offspring into territory cores.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Hunting grounds of the NR are used by multiple wolf packs, a situation that does not conform to the widely held conceptual model of distinct territorial boundaries with interstitial prey refuges that has been suggested on an empirical (Mech 1977) and theoretical (Lewis & Murray 1993) basis.”
From Landscape heterogeneity shapes predation in a newly restored predator–prey system (2007) · cites this paper as Mech 1977
Citations
Cites
White-Tailed Deer Migration and Its Role in Wolf Predation
Hoskinson, R. L., & Mech, L. D. (1976) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3799944 · Cited by 108
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- ERICKSON, A.B., MINN DEP CONSERV TEC 5: 65 (1961).
- HAWKINS, R.E., A PRELIMINARY STUDY OF SOCIAL ORGANIZATION OF WHITE-TAILED DEER, JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 34: 407 (1970). · DOI
- HAWKINS, R.E., DISPERSAL OF DEER FROM CRAB ORCHARD NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE, JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 35: 216 (1971). · DOI
- HICKERSON, H, MAN CULTURE ANIMALS: 43 (1965).
- MAHRENKE, P, JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 52: 630 (1971). · DOI
- MECH, L.D., SPACING AND POSSIBLE MECHANISMS OF POPULATION REGULATION IN WOLVES, AMERICAN ZOOLOGIST 12: 642 (1972).
- MECH, L.D., PRODUCTIVITY, MORTALITY, AND POPULATION TRENDS OF WOLVES IN NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTA, JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 58: 559 (1977). · DOI
- MECH, L.D., NC52 US FOR SERV RES: 35 (1971).
- MECH, L.D., NC97 US FOR SERV RES: 2 (1973).
- MECH, L.D., P INT C GAME BIOL 11: 315 (1974).
- MECH, L.D., US NATL PARK SERV 7: 145 (1966).
- Mech, L. D., Proceedings of the 1975 Predation Symposium: 55 (1977).
- Murie, A., The Wolves of Mount McKinley, Fauna of the national parks of the United States, Fauna Series 5 121 (1944).
- NELSON M.E. THESIS U MINNESOTA (1977).
- PETERS, R.P., SCENT-MARKING IN WOLVES, AMERICAN SCIENTIST 63: 628 (1975).
- Pimlott, D. H., Wolf research study areas 1959-1965, Algonquin Provincial Park, Ontario Department of Lands and Forests Research Report 87: 40 (1969).
- SEAL, U.S., BLOOD ANALYSES OF WOLF PUPS AND THEIR ECOLOGICAL AND METABOLIC INTERPRETATION, JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 56: 64 (1975). · DOI
- VANBALLENBERGHE, V, WOLF PACK KILLS ANOTHER WOLF, AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 90: 490 (1973). · DOI
- VANBALLENBERGHE, V, WEIGHTS, GROWTH, AND SURVIVAL OF TIMBER WOLF PUPS IN MINNESOTA, JOURNAL OF MAMMALOGY 56: 44 (1975). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–140 of 140
Hunting dogs are at biggest risk to get attacked by wolves near wolves’ territory boundaries
Tikkunen, M., & Kojola, I. (2019) · Mammal Research · doi:10.1007/s13364-019-00444-3 · Cited by 12
“Wolves are particularly aggressive towards strange wolves that invade their territories, and intraspecific aggression is the most frequent cause of wolves’mortality (Cubaynes et al. 2014; Mech 1977a, 1994).”
InfluentialEffects of Human Harvesting, Residences, and Forage Abundance on Deer Spatial Distribution
Takada, H., & Nakamura, K. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14131924 · Cited by 11
“Predation risk is one of the most lethal selection pressures and strongly influences the habitat selection of prey species, such as those of the deer family (Cervidae) [1–5].”
BackgroundTadesse, S., & Kotler, B. P. (2013) · Journal of Tropical Ecology · doi:10.1017/s0266467413000710 · Cited by 12
Ant predation on two species of birch leaf-mining sawflies
Pezzolesi, L. S. W., & Hager, B. J. (1994) · doi:10.2307/2426618 · Cited by 11
Influence of living area space on agonistic interaction in Telomian dogs
Pettijohn, T. F., Davis, K. L., & Scott, J. P. (1980) · Behavioral and Neural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0163-1047(80)92343-2 · Cited by 10
Scent‐marking in captive red pandas (Ailurus fulgens)
Conover, G. K., & Gittleman, J. (1989) · doi:10.1002/zoo.1430080210 · Cited by 10
Spatial overlap of gray wolves and ungulate prey changes seasonally corresponding to prey migration
Wehr, N. H., Moore, S. A., Isaac, E. J., Kellner, K. F., Millspaugh, J. J., & Belant, J. L. (2024) · Movement Ecology · doi:10.1186/s40462-024-00466-w · Cited by 9
Functional response and population dynamics for fighting predator, based on activity distribution.
Garay, J., Varga, Z., Gámez, M., & Cabello, T. (2015) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.12.012 · Cited by 9
Overview of Current Research on Wolves in Russia
Poyarkov, A., Korablev, M., Bragina, E. V., & Hernandez-Blanco, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.869161 · Cited by 7
“Using buffer zone hypotesis (Mech, 1977, 1979)”.”
Meng, X.-Y., & Sun, X.-Z. (2025) · International Journal of Applied and Computational Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s40819-025-02077-4 · Cited by 6
“For instance, in predator–prey systems such as wolves and ungulates, prey species may employ spatial avoidance strategies by moving beyond predator core ranges or demonstrating increased survival rates in peripheral habitats [ 16, 17 ].”
A Mathematical Approach to Territorial Pattern Formation
Potts, J. R., & Lewis, M. A. (2014) · American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.4169/amer.math.monthly.121.09.754 · Cited by 5
Трепет, С. А., & Григорьевна, Е. Т. (2012) · Biology Bulletin · doi:10.1134/s1062359012070114 · Cited by 6
“…taken on a local scale do not ensure safety to wild ungulates and may even prove favorable for nonterritorial wolves from neighboring regions, eventually bringing more harm than good (Mech, 1977; Kudaktin, Golgof skaya, and Bibikov, 1979; Allen, 1979; Kudaktin, 1982; Suvorov and Kirienko, 2008).”
BackgroundAre Wolf-Mediated Trophic Cascades Boosting Biodiversity in the Great Lakes Region?
Rooney, T. P., & Anderson, D. P. (2009) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-85952-1_13 · Cited by 8
“In his study of a rapid decline in prey density, Mech (1977) observed that the majority of surviving white-tailed deer were found at the edges of wolf-pack territories.”
BackgroundChapter 15 Wolf Recolonization of the Madison Headwaters Area in Yellowstone
Smith, D. W., Stahler, D. R., & Becker, M. S. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/s1936-7961(08)00215-7 · Cited by 5
Cole, K. E., Moffatt, M., Codding, B. F., & Broughton, J. M. (2023) · Quaternary International · doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2023.10.006 · Cited by 5
Food habits of gray wolves in the Bogdkhan Mountain Strictly Protected Area, Mongolia
Nakazawa, C., Tungalagtuya, K., Maruyama, N., & Suda, K. (2008) · doi:10.20798/biospherecons.9.1_1 · Cited by 5
“In an area with severat wolfpacks, the wolfpack buffer zones between tenitories occupy from 25 to 40% ofa region (Mech 1977).”
BackgroundShave, J. R., Cherry, S. G., Derocher, A. E., & Fortin, D. (2020) · Wildlife Biology · doi:10.2981/wlb.00695 · Cited by 5
Caniglia, R. (2008) · doi:10.6092/unibo/amsdottorato/657 · Cited by 4
“…territory limits of neighbouring packs may partially overlap (Peters & Mech, 1975b; Peterson & Page, 1988) in a kind of buffer zone between packs (Mech, 1977d) but territory boundaries are rarely trespassed and when this occurs, it may lead to violent aggressions and intra-specific mortality…”
BackgroundEnvironmental fluctuations alter the competitive trade-offs of group size in a social primate
Jacobson, O. T., Crofoot, M. C., Finerty, G. E., Perry, S., & Barrett, B. J. (2026) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-026-03048-8 · Cited by 5
Is niche separation between wolves and cougars realized in the Rocky Mountains?
Krawchuk, K. E. (2014) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3h41jv9f · Cited by 4
“The potential for prey refuges that have been described in single predator system (Mech 1977; Hebblewhite, Merrill and McDonald 2005) may be even more limited in multiple predator systems (Kotler, Blaustein and Brown 1992; Thaker et al.”
BackgroundCosts and benefits of Daphnia antipredator behavior and consequences on community stability
Boeing, W. J. (2002) · doi:10.31390/gradschool_dissertations.717 · Cited by 5
“…Mather and Roitberg 1987), (2) modifications to life-history such as reproduction earlier in life (Gadgil and Bossert 1970; Dodson 1989a), and (3) behavioral such as migration (Mech 1977; Bollens and Frost 1989) and reduced activity (Koperski 1998) that lowers the encounter rate with predators.”
BackgroundClermont, J., Broin, F. D., Poulin, M., & Berteaux, D. (2025) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.71058 · Cited by 2
“For example, in systems where the predator is highly territorial and avoids encountering conspecifics, buffer zones between territories may serve as refuges for prey (Mech 1977; Lewis and Murray 1993).”
Scale‐dependence in elk habitat selection for a reintroduced population in Wisconsin, USA
Merems, J. L., Brose, A. L., Tack, J. P., Crimmins, S. M., & Deelen, T. R. V. (2024) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.70346 · Cited by 1
“Habitat selection in ungulates is strongly influenced by terrain features (Boyce et al., 2003 ), climatic conditions (Dussault et al., 2004 ), forage distribution (Fryxell et al., 2004 ), predation risk (Mech, 1977), and competition (Fretwell & Lucas, 1970).”
BackgroundBreeding behavioral activities of captive red pandas in Nepal
Maharjan, H., Sharma, H., Gutam, R., Shah, R., Pokharel, C. P., & Belant, J. (2023) · Journal of Animal Behaviour and Biometeorology · doi:10.31893/jabb.23016 · Cited by 2
“Mammalian carnivores frequently exhibit scent-marking to determine identity, reproductive status, spatial information, and communication (Peters and Mech 1975; Henry 1977; Mech 1977; Gosling 1982; Conover and Gittleman, 1989; Gorman and Trowbridge 1989).”
BackgroundWolf-Moose Spatial Dynamics in Alberta’s Athabasca Oil Sands Region
Neilson, E. (2017) · ERA: Education and Research Archive (University of Alberta) · doi:10.7939/r3cn6zc9z · Cited by 2
Planning and Performance of Wildlife Crossing Structures in a Major Transportation Corridor
Clevenger, A., Wierzchowski, J., & Waltho, N. (2002) · doi:10.1016/b978-008044117-7/50031-1 · Cited by 2
Han, R., Guin, L. N., & Acharya, S. (2022) · The European Physical Journal Plus · doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02358-7 · Cited by 1
Powell, R. A. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191949142.001.0001 · Cited by 2
Wyrick, S., Kapfer, J. M., & Waraczynski, M. A. (2025) · Northeastern Naturalist · doi:10.1656/045.032.0104 · Cited by 1
“Using WDNR shapefiles, we targeted locations near the core of each Gray Wolf terri - tory to reduce the influence of shifting territorial boundaries (Mech 1977, 1994; Peters and Mech 1975).”
Rotational Flocking with Spontaneous Directional Changes
Liu, X., Shao, G., Tang, Y.-D., & Chen, D.-X. (2021) · Complex · doi:10.1155/2021/1288161 · Cited by 1
“Indeed, despotic decision-making is more obvious in the predatory behavior of wolf packs [27].”
BackgroundPredation may counteract climatic change as a driving force for movements of mountain ungulates
Ferretti, F., & Lovari, S. (2016) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.008 · Cited by 2
Flagel, D. G., Belovsky, G. E., & West, W. E. (2016) · The American Midland Naturalist · doi:10.1674/0003-0031-176.1.147 · Cited by 2
“Deer have been observed to change their distributions as well as foraging behaviors in relation to wolves (Mech, 1977; Flagel et al., 2016), which in turn appears to be reducing deer herbivory impacts on Great Lakes forest plants, including increased sapling growth and understory forb diversity…”
BackgroundPredation impacts and management strategies for wildlife protection
Bodenchuk, M. J., & Hayes, D. J. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-46046-6_11 · Cited by 2
Panebianco, A., Gregorio, P. F., Schroeder, N., Marozzi, A., Ovejero, R., Heidel, L., Peña, F., Leggieri, L., Taraborelli, P. A., & Carmanchahi, P. (2022) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-021-03104-2 · Cited by 5
Golitko, M., & Grogan, D. M. (2026) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-025-09760-2
“Similar buffer zones have also been noted among other animal species, for instance, wolves, where lack of hunting along territorial boundaries can lead to higher game density (Mech, 1977, 1994).”
Clermont, J., Broin, F. D.-D., Poulin, M.-P., & Berteaux, D. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.08.14.607927
“As such, the spatial configuration of fox home ranges does not lead to buffer zones of low predation risk between territories as observed in some wolf-ungulate systems (Mech, 1977; Anderson et al., 2005).”
BackgroundTransitional Periodic Patterns and Triple Attractors in a Predator-Prey System with Fear and RefugePreprint
Garai, S., Pati, N. C., Layek, G. C., & Pal, N. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1088857/v1 · Cited by 1
The Future of the Eastern Timber-wolf in the United States
Fogleman, V. (1984) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892900014879
“In effect, the buffer zones formed reservoirs that served to repopulate the cores of wolf-pack territory (Mech, 1977).”
BackgroundTrade-Offs in Anti-Predator Behavior
Bednekoff, P. (2019) · Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-045337-8.00296-5
Predator-Prey Relationships: The Manager’s Perspective
David, J. H., & Michael, J. B. (2010) · Proceedings - Vertebrate Pest Conference · doi:10.5070/v424110385
“Mech (1977) suggested that wolves avoided the “buffer zones” between wolf packs to prevent intraspecific strife between neighboring packs.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Mech, L. D.
- Affiliations
- United States Fish and Wildlife Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mech, L. David
- ORCID
- Mech, L. David
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1977-10-21
- Volume
- 198
- Issue
- 4314
- Pages
- 320-321
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2102080812
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- territorial overlap, offspring dispersal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review