Cited by 997HIV Research and TreatmentHIV/AIDS drug development and treatmentEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

The accuracy of reverse transcriptase from HIV-1

Roberts, John D., Bebenek, Katarzyna, Kunkel, Thomas A.·1988·Science

Abstract

A study was conducted to determine the fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed in vitro by the reverse transcriptase from a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Like other retroviral reverse transcriptases, the HIV-1 enzyme does not correct errors by exonucleolytic proofreading. Measurements with M13mp2-based fidelity assays indicated that the HIV-1 enzyme, isolated either from virus particles or from Escherichia coli cells infected with a plasmid expressing the cloned gene, was exceptionally inaccurate, having an average error rate per detectable nucleotide incorporated of 1/1700. It was, in fact, the least accurate reverse transcriptase described to date, one-tenth as accurate as the polymerases isolated from avian myeloblastosis or murine leukemia viruses, which have average error rates of ∼1/17,000 and ∼1/30,000, respectively. DNA sequence analyses of mutations generated by HIV-1 polymerase showed that base substitution, addition, and deletion errors were all produced. Certain template positions were mutational hotspots where the error rate could be as high as 1 per 70 polymerized nucleotides. The data are consistent with the notion that the exceptional diversity of the HIV-1 genome results from error-prone reverse transcription.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.2460925

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In assays of RNA-dependent DNA synthesis, there is no significant difference in mutation rates among AMV, MLV, and HIV-1 RTs.

    “Interestingly, assays designed to read mutations during RNA-dependent DNA synthesis reveal no significant difference in mutation rates among AMV, MLV, and HIV-1 RTs, indicating that HIV-1 RT’s misincorporation rate is higher during DNA-dependent DNA synthesis (Roberts et al. 1988, Boyer et al. 1992, Ji and Loeb 1992, Yu and Goodman 1992, Bakhanashvili and Hizi 1993, Kerr and Anderson 1997).”
  • In cell-free assays of DNA-dependent DNA synthesis, AMV and MLV RTs introduce nearly 10-fold fewer mutations than HIV-1 RT.

    “Based on cell-free assays designed to read mutations during DNA-dependent DNA synthesis, it has been shown that AMV and MLV RTs introduce nearly 10-fold fewer mutations when compared to HIV-1 RT (Roberts et al. 1988, 1989, Barrioluengo et al. 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roberts, J. D., Bebenek, K., & Kunkel, T. A.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Venue
Science
Published
1988-11-25
Volume
242
Issue
4882
Pages
1171-1173
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2065740427
Cited by
997
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 38
FWCI
7.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS drug development and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, error rate, DNA synthesis fidelity, exonuclease proofreading, mutational hotspots, insertion and deletion errors, viral genome diversity, retroviral evolution
MeSH terms
DNA, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel, Escherichia coli, Exonucleases, HIV, Moloney murine leukemia virus, Mutation, Avian Myeloblastosis Virus, Nucleotides, Recombinant Proteins, RNA-Directed DNA Polymerase

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review