The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Evolutionary Basis for Conservation Strategies
Abstract
thropocentric from their inception in the Middle Ages to the present (1, 2). During dynastic and feudal times, parts of kingdoms were set aside as hunting grounds for the aristocracy, thus preserving everything that dwelled therein. This, plus severe natural and cultural control of human populations resulted in environmen-tal protection for centuries. Today, with a burgeoning and expand-ing human population of 5.3 billion, no more than 4500 areas are protected globally (?); that is equivalent to a mere 3.2 % of our planet's landmass. National parks, wildlife refuges, biosphere re-serves, military reserves, Indian reservations, and other forms of legally protected areas have been established for aesthetic, political, or practical purposes in the last 150 years. Many reserves in less-developed nations are paper parks only; many in the more developed are lamentably endangered by touristic herds, and certain wilderness parks are threatened by short-sighted national energy
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities
Brooks, T. M., Mittermeier, R. A., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gerlach, J., Hoffmann, M., Lamoreux, J. F., Mittermeier, C. G., Pilgrim, J. D., & Rodrigues, A. S. L. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127609 · Cited by 2,396
Mammals on the EDGE: Conservation Priorities Based on Threat and Phylogeny
Isaac, N. J. B., Turvey, S. T., Collen, B., Waterman, C., & Baillie, J. E. M. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000296 · Cited by 1,109
Fjeldså, J. (1994) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/bf00055939 · Cited by 293
Conservation and the Genomics of Populations
Allendorf, F. W., Funk, W. C., Aitken, S. N., Byrne, M., Luikart, G., & Antunes, A. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198856566.001.0001 · Cited by 207
Impacts of taxonomic inertia for the conservation ofAfrican ungulate diversity: an overview
Gippoliti, S., Cotterill, F. P. D., Zinner, D., & Groves, C. P. (2018) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12335 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Erwin, T. L.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1991-08-16
- Volume
- 253
- Issue
- 5021
- Pages
- 750-752
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2023598508
- Cited by
- 374
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Evolutionary Basis for Conservation Strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.253.5021.750
- The paper
- Erwin, T. L. (1991). An Evolutionary Basis for Conservation Strategies. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.253.5021.750
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.