The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reproducibility and Variability in Neural Spike Trains
Abstract
To provide information about dynamic sensory stimuli, the pattern of action potentials in spiking neurons must be variable. To ensure reliability these variations must be related, reproducibly, to the stimulus. For H1, a motion-sensitive neuron in the fly's visual system, constant-velocity motion produces irregular spike firing patterns, and spike counts typically have a variance comparable to the mean, for cells in the mammalian cortex. But more natural, time-dependent input signals yield patterns of spikes that are much more reproducible, both in terms of timing and of counting precision. Variability and reproducibility are quantified with ideas from information theory, and measured spike sequences in H1 carry more than twice the amount of information they would if they followed the variance-mean relation seen with constant inputs. Thus, models that may accurately account for the neural response to static stimuli can significantly underestimate the reliability of signal transfer under more natural conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals
Britten, K. H., Shadlen, M. N., Newsome, W. T., & Movshon, J. A. (1993) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523800010269 · Cited by 594
Cited by
Bi, G.-Q., & Poo, M.-M. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-24-10464.1998 · Cited by 4,744
Faisal, A. A., Selen, L. P. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2258 · Cited by 2,883
Parvalbumin neurons and gamma rhythms enhance cortical circuit performance
Sohal, V. S., Zhang, F., Yizhar, O., & Deisseroth, K. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07991 · Cited by 2,606
Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems
Niven, J. E., & Laughlin, S. B. (2008) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.017574 · Cited by 1,056
Whitney, C. (2001) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196158 · Cited by 619
Metadata
- Authors
- de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R., Lewen, G. D., Strong, S. P., Koberle, R., & Bialek, W.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1997-03-21
- Volume
- 275
- Issue
- 5307
- Pages
- 1805-1808
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2117509237
- Cited by
- 702
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reproducibility and Variability in Neural Spike Trains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.275.5307.1805
- The paper
- de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R., Lewen, G. D., Strong, S. P., Koberle, R., & Bialek, W. (1997). Reproducibility and Variability in Neural Spike Trains. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5307.1805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.