CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 447

How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review

Whitney, Carol·2001·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
DOI 10.3758/bf03196158
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03196158

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Open-bigram coding represents ordered pairs of letters independently of their contiguity.

    “In Grainger and van Heuven's scheme, open-bigrams code for the presence of ordered pairs of letters independently of their contiguity.”

    From A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic Processing (2011) · cites this paper as Whitney (2001)

    Section 2.4, “Bigram and Word Levels,” says bigram nodes recognize ordered pairs of letters and can be activated by noncontiguous letters. That supports the description of open-bigram coding, but the passage describes Whitney’s SERIOL framework, not Grainger and van Heuven’s scheme; our copy does not establish that attribution. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Alpern, M. (1962). Introduction. In H. Dawson (Ed.), The eye (Vol. 3, pp. 3-5). New York: Academic Press.
  2. Berry, M. J., Warland, D. K., & Meister, M. (1997). The structure and precision of retinal spike trains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 5411-5416.
  3. Bjork, E. L., & Murray, J. T. (1977). On the nature of input channels in visual processing. Psychological Review, 84, 472-484.
  4. Bryden, M. P. (1982). Laterality: Functional asymmetry in the intact brain. New York: Academic Press.
  5. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Mod- els of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
  6. Costello, A. D. L., & Warrington, E. K. (1987). The dissociation of visuospatial neglect and neglect dyslexia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 50, 1110-1116.
  7. Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behaviour, 12, 627-635.
  8. Frederiksen, J. R., & Kroll, J. F. (1976). Spelling and sound: Ap- proaches to the internal lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychol- ogy: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 361-379.
  9. Georgopoulos, A. P., Kalaska, J. F., Caminiti, R., & Massey, J. T. (1982). On the relation between the direction of two-dimensional arm movements and cell discharge in the motor cortex. Journal of Neuro- science, 2, 1527-1537.
  10. Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1991). Masked constituent letter prim- ing in an alphabetic decision task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 413-434.
  11. Hammond, E. J., & Green, D. W. (1982). Detecting targets in letter and non-letter arrays. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 67-82.
  12. Hellige, J. B. (1993). Hemispheric asymmetry: What's right and what's left? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  13. Hellige,J. B., Cowin, E. L., & Eng, T. L. (1995). Recognition of CVC syllables from LVF, RVF, and central locations: Hemispheric differ- ences and interhemispheric interactions. Journal of Cognitive Neuro- science, 7, 258-266.
  14. Koriat, A. (1985). Lateralization effects in pointed and unpointed He- brew. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 161-173.
  15. Koriat, A., & Norman, J. (1985). Reading rotated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 490-508.
  16. Mason, M. (1982). Recognition time for letters and nonletters: Effects of serial position, array size, and processing order. Journal of Exper- imental Psychology, 8, 724-738.
  17. Mayzner, M. S., & Tresselt, M. E. (1970). Visual information pro- cessing with sequential inputs: A general model for sequential blank- ing, displacement, and overprinting phenomena. In E. Harms & M. E. Tresselt (Eds.), Third Conference on the Fundamentals of Psychol- ogy: Various approaches to the study of perception (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 169, pp. 599-618). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
  18. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive acti- vation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An ac- count of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
  19. Mewhort, D. J. K., & Beal, A. L. (1977). Mechanisms of word iden- tification. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, 629-640.
  20. Mewhort, D. J. K., Merikle, P. M., & Bryden, M. P. (1969). On the transfer from iconic to short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 89-94.
  21. Mozer, M. C. (1987). Early parallel processing in reading: A connec- tionist approach. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 83-104). London: Erlbaum.
  22. Mozer, M. C., & Behrmann, M. (1992). On the interaction of selec- tive attention and lexical knowledge: A connectionist account of ne- glect dyslexia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, 96-123.
  23. O'Regan, J. K., Levy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., & Brugaillere, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 289-298.
  24. Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Baynes, K. (1992). Modes of lexical access in the callosotomized brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 155-164.
  25. Rieke, F., Warland, D. [K.], De Ruyter van Steveninck, R., & Bialek, W. (1997). Spikes: Exploring the neural code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  26. Sugishita, M., Hemmi, I., Sakuma, I., Beppu, H., & Shiokawa, Y. (1993). The problem of macular sparing after unilateral occipital le- sions. Journal of Neurology, 241, 1-9.
  27. Victor, J. D., & Purpura, K. P. (1996). Nature and precision of tempo- ral coding in visual cortex: A metric-space analysis. Journal of Neuro- physiology, 76, 1310-1326.
  28. Whitney, C. S. (in press). An explanation of the length effect for ro- tated words. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling.
  29. In J. A. Reggia, E. Ruppin, & R. S. Berndt (Eds.), Neural modeling of brain and cognitive disorders (pp. 201-228). Singapore: World Scientific.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitney, C.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2001-06
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
221-243
ISSN
  • 1069-9384
  • 1531-5320
DOI
10.3758/bf03196158
Cited by
447
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review