Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Black Carbon and the Carbon Cycle

Kuhlbusch, Thomas A. J.·1998·Science

Abstract

When vegetation and fossil fuels burn, the combustion creates that becomes distributed throughout the environment. Determining how it is created and where it goes is important for studying the past history of fire and for understanding global carbon and oxygen budgets. In his Research Commentary, Kuhlbusch discusses results reported in the same issue by Masiello and Druffel in which carbon mass and isotope measurements were used to study the age of black carbon in ocean sediment. They find that the black carbon is 2400 to 13,900 years older than the concurrently deposited sediment, suggesting that the black carbon must have been stored in some as-yet unknown intermediate pool.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.280.5371.1903

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Kuhlbusch, T. A. J.
Venue
Science
Published
1998-06-19
Volume
280
Issue
5371
Pages
1903-1904
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W103717088
Cited by
301
References
0
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Black Carbon and the Carbon Cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.280.5371.1903
The paper
Kuhlbusch, T. A. J. (1998). Black Carbon and the Carbon Cycle. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5371.1903

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.