Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Neuromorphic Vision Sensors

Indiveri, Giacomo, Douglas, Rodney·2000·Science

Abstract

Vision is one of the most useful sensory functions, but the real-time processing of the continuous, high-dimensional input signals provided by vision sensors is a major challenge in robot design. Conventional digital vision sensors tend to have excessive power consumption, size, and cost for useful applications. In this TechView, Indiveri and Douglas discuss an alternative strategy, namely neuromorphic vision sensors that are based on biological vision systems. In these sensors, specialized sensory processing functions inspired by biological systems such as fly eyes are integrated in parallel, asynchronous circuits that respond in real time. These sensors offer significant advantages over conventional vision sensors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.288.5469.1189

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Indiveri, G., & Douglas, R.
Venue
Science
Published
2000-05-19
Volume
288
Issue
5469
Pages
1189-1190
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2049989540
Cited by
167
References
0
FWCI
4.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuromorphic Vision Sensors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.288.5469.1189
The paper
Indiveri, G., & Douglas, R. (2000). Neuromorphic Vision Sensors. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5469.1189

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.