The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recovery and Management Options for Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon in the Columbia River Basin
Abstract
Construction of four dams on the lower Snake River (in northwestern United States) between 1961 and 1975 altered salmon spawning habitat, elevated smolt and adult migration mortality, and contributed to severe declines of Snake River salmon populations. By applying a matrix model to long-term population data, we found that (i) dam passage improvements have dramatically mitigated direct mortality associated with dams; (ii) even if main stem survival were elevated to 100%, Snake River spring/summer chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) would probably continue to decline toward extinction; and (iii) modest reductions in first-year mortality or estuarine mortality would reverse current population declines.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Natural-origin fish from these stocks are of particular management concern, as they are listed under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) and poor survival through the estuary may limit their recovery (Kareiva et al. 2000).”
From Life in the Fast Lane: Feeding and Growth of Juvenile Steelhead and Chinook Salmon in Main‐Stem Habitats of the Columbia River Estuary (2022) · cites this paper as Kareiva et al. 2000
In the citing paper
“Salmon spend days to months in the large, complex, and variable lower Columbia River and estuary (LCRE) in the coastal or western subbasin west of the Cascade Mountains while migrating downstream to the Pacific Ocean as juveniles, a critical and potentially limiting stage in their life cycles (Kareiva et al. 2000) (Fig. 2a).”
From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Kareiva et al. 2000
Citations
Cites
Ricker, W. E. (1976) · Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada · doi:10.1139/f76-191 · Cited by 128
Population Viability Analysis of Spring Chinook Salmon in the South Umpqua River, Oregon
Ratner, S., Lande, R., & Roper, B. B. (1997) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95457.x · Cited by 67
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- National Research Council Upstream: Salmon and Society in the Pacific Northwest (National Academy Press Washington DC 1996).
- Waples R., Am. Fish. Soc. Symp. 17, 8 (1995).
- Supplemental Web material is available on Science Online at www.sciencemag.org/feature/data/1053311.shl.
- J. Williams S. Smith W. Muir N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. in press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Basic Principles and Ecological Consequences of Altered Flow Regimes for Aquatic Biodiversity
BUNN, S. E., & ARTHINGTON, A. H. (2002) · Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0 · Cited by 3,379
International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition
Gann, G. D., McDonald, T., Walder, B., Aronson, J. C., Nelson, C. R., Jonson, J., Hallett, J. G., Eisenberg, C., Guariguata, M. R., Liu, J., et al. (2019) · Restoration Ecology · doi:10.1111/rec.13035 · Cited by 1,581
Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world
Malmqvist, B., & Rundle, S. (2002) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892902000097 · Cited by 1,047
Water management in Iran: what is causing the looming crisis?
Madani, K. M. (2014) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-014-0182-z · Cited by 703
Isaak, D. J., Luce, C. H., Rieman, B. E., Nagel, D. E., Peterson, E. E., Horan, D. L., Parkes, S., & Chandler, G. L. (2009) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/09-0822 · Cited by 453
Metadata
- Authors
- Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., & McClure, M.
- Affiliations
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center (US)
- Santa Clara University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McClure, Michelle
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2000-11-03
- Volume
- 290
- Issue
- 5493
- Pages
- 977-979
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2071272508
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 20.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
- Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Keywords
- Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, Snake River dams, salmon population decline, extinction risk, smolt mortality, population recovery, matrix population models, Columbia River Basin
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Female, Fresh Water, Male, Models, Biological, Population Dynamics, Salmon, Northwestern United States, Models, Statistical, Survival Rate, Ecosystem
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review