Cited by 17Academic Writing and Publishingscientometrics and bibliometrics researchAcademic Publishing and Open Access

Structured Abstracts for Technical Journals

Kostoff, Ronald N., Hartley, James·2001·Science

Abstract

Our reading of thousands of technical journal abstracts in myriad disciplines shows substantial information non-uniformity in the nonmedical records' abstracts. They can vary in information volume, information categories, and information clarity. Commonly, research purpose, results achieved, and

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.292.5519.1067a

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kostoff, R. N., & Hartley, J.
Affiliations
  • Office of Naval Research (US)
  • Keele University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kostoff, Ronald N.
Venue
Science
Published
2001-05-11
Volume
292
Issue
5519
Pages
1067-1067
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2056264053
Cited by
17
References
1
Citations by year
2022: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
24.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
structured abstracts, information clarity, purpose of research, research outcomes, information categories
MeSH terms
Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review