The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Creating a Buzz About Insect Genomes
Open accessAbstract
WHEN E. O. WILSON PROCLAIMED THAT INSECTS ARE THE “little creatures who run the world” (1), he was simply reaffi rming the long-recognized dominance of the largest class of animals on our planet. Insects constitute approximately 53% of all living species, with one group alone (the ants), accounting for almost a quarter of terrestrial animal biomass (2). These tiny creatures also exert outsized impacts on human affairs. By serving as pollinators to more than 75% of fl owering plant species (3), insects are essential to the maintenance and productivity of natural and agricultural ecosystems. But other insects consume or damage more than 25% of all agricultural, forestry, and livestock production in the United States, costing our economy more than $30 billion annually (4). These losses occur despite more than 150 years of concerted efforts to prevent them. Insects and other arthropods not only affect our food supply, they also carry disease. Parasites and pathogens carried by insects and their relatives have led to more loss of human life than all wars in recorded history; even today, insect-borne diseases are a leading cause of death of children under the age of 5 (5). The annual cost of vector-borne diseases worldwide is estimated at almost $50 billion (6). Clearly, our health and well-being depend on our ability to understand and manage arthropods of agricultural, medical, and veterinary importance. In the past decade, biomedical research has increasingly relied on information obtained from sequencing the human genome, and early genome-enabled successes have inspired a new vision of genomic medicine (7). We believe that genomics also can improve our lives by contributing to a better understanding of insect biology and transforming our ability to manage arthropods that threaten our health, food supply, and economic security. Because of the overwhelming diversity and abundance of insects, achieving these goals will require a project of grand scale. Therefore, we, the undersigned, are pleased to announce the launch of the “i5k” initiative to sequence the genomes of 5000 species of insects and other arthropods during the next 5 years (8). This project is aimed at sequencing and analyzing the genomes of all species known to be important to worldwide agriculture and food safety, medicine, and energy production; all species used as models in biology; the most abundant insects in world ecosystems; and, to achieve a deep understanding of arthropod evolution, representatives of insect relatives in every major branch of arthropod phylogeny. The i5k initiative will be broad and inclusive, seeking to involve scientists from around the world and obtain funding from academia, governments, industry, and private sources. We also aim to encourage new collaborative research by computer scientists, bioinformaticians, and biologists to overcome the challenges of handling this unprecedented volume of data and derive meaning from these genomes. GENE E. ROBINSON,* KEVIN J. HACKETT, MARY PURCELL-MIRAMONTES, SUSAN J. BROWN, JAY D. EVANS, MARIAN R. GOLDSMITH, DANIEL LAWSON, JACK OKAMURO, HUGH M. ROBERTSON, DAVID J. SCHNEIDER Department of Entomology, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250, USA. Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506–4190, USA. Arthropod Genomics Consortium and European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK. College of the Environment and Life Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA. USDA Agricultural Research Service, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Big Data: Astronomical or Genomical?
Stephens, Z. D., Lee, S. Y., Faghri, F., Campbell, R. H., Zhai, C., Efron, M. J., Iyer, R., Schatz, M. C., Sinha, S., & Robinson, G. E. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002195 · Cited by 1,340
Self-citationMODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways—2013 update
Machnicka, M. A., Milanowska, K., Osman Oglou, O., Purta, E., Kurkowska, M., Olchowik, A., Januszewski, W., Kalinowski, S., Dunin-Horkawicz, S., Rother, K. M., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks1007 · Cited by 1,013
Anchored Hybrid Enrichment for Massively High-Throughput Phylogenomics
Lemmon, A. R., Emme, S. A., & Lemmon, E. M. (2012) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/sys049 · Cited by 833
Genome-scale coestimation of species and gene trees
Boussau, B., Szöllősi, G. J., Duret, L., Gouy, M., Tannier, E., & Daubin, V. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.141978.112 · Cited by 258
Hiller, M., Schaar, B. T., Indjeian, V. B., Kingsley, D. M., Hagey, L. R., & Bejerano, G. (2012) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.032 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, G. E., Hackett, K. J., Purcell-Miramontes, M., Brown, S. J., Evans, J. D., Goldsmith, M. R., Lawson, D., Okamuro, J., Robertson, H. M., & Schneider, D. J.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2011-03-18
- Volume
- 331
- Issue
- 6023
- Pages
- 1386-1386
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1976049389
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Creating a Buzz About Insect Genomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.331.6023.1386
- The paper
- Robinson, G. E., Hackett, K. J., Purcell-Miramontes, M., Brown, S. J., Evans, J. D., Goldsmith, M. R., Lawson, D., Okamuro, J., Robertson, H. M., & Schneider, D. J. (2011). Creating a Buzz About Insect Genomes. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.331.6023.1386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.