Irreversible gene repression model for control of development: Lessening of developmental potential may result from progressive repression of previously active genes
Abstract
As the pluripotent cells of early embryos differentiate, each progressively loses the potency to develop into several phenotypes. Ultimately, each cell becomes irreversibly restricted to the expression of a single phenotype. Although in many instances details regarding those restriction events are well known, there is little information concerning the nature of the gene transcription changes involved. A model that accounts for the diminution of developmental potential as resulting from progressive, irreversible repression of previously active genes is presented. A scheme of progressive gene repression, rather than selective gene activation, is most consistent with observations from experimental embryology as well as from more recent biochemical experimentation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Development is fundamentally irreversible, providing a strong analogy for the irreversible changes that churn during chromosome and genome evolution.
“Interestingly, development is fundamentally irreversible (181–183), providing a strong analogy for the irreversible changes that churn during chromosome and genome evolution.”
From Topological Approaches in Animal Comparative Genomics (2026) · cites this paper as [181]
Cites
<i>In Vitro</i> Synthesis of DNA Complementary to Purified Rabbit Globin mRNA
Ross, J., Aviv, H., Scolnick, E., & Leder, P. (1972) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.69.1.264 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Borok, M. J., Tran, D. A., Ho, M. C. W., & Drewell, R. A. (2010) · Development · doi:10.1242/dev.036160 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Topological Approaches in Animal Comparative Genomics
Schultz, D. T., & Simakov, O. (2026) · Annual Review of Animal Biosciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-animal-030424-084541 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Caplan, A. I., & Ordahl, C. P.
- Affiliations
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
- Temple University (US)
- ORCID
- Caplan, Arnold I.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1978-07-14
- Volume
- 201
- Issue
- 4351
- Pages
- 120-130
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1970182733
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- gene repression, developmental potential, cell differentiation, pluripotency, gene transcription, cell fate determination, embryonic development
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Blastocyst, Cell Differentiation, Cell Nucleus, Cytoplasm, Environment, Enzyme Repression, Extremities, Genes, Models, Biological, Morphogenesis, Phenotype, Regeneration, Transcription, Genetic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review