China cracks down on fraud
Abstract
More than 400 authors face punishment for peer-review scam.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
News in the past few years has implicated an alarmingly high proportion of plagiarism, falsification or fabrication in the scientific and clinical literature from China.
“Moreover, news in the past few years has implicated an alarmingly high proportion of plagiarism, falsification or fabrication in the scientific and clinical literature from China [13–15].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tong, Z., Li, F., Ogawa, Y., Watanabe, N., & Furukawa, T. A. (2018) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0554-2 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
A comprehensive review of Hep-2 cell line in translational research for laryngeal cancer.
Gorphe, P. (2019) · PubMed Central · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Shen, S., Rousseau, R., & Wang, D. (2018) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2691-0 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Therefore, e-mail fraud is the main method used in this academic scandal (Normile 2017).”
MethodWang, L., & Liu, Z. (2019) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2019.08.006 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Chang, X., Gong, Q., Li, C., Yue, W., Yu, X., Yao, S., & Feng, J. (2021) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291721002816 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“In order to respond to these challenges, the government has been reforming the academic evaluation system that placed much emphasis on the number of publications (Qiu, 2010), and has announced strict regulations against academic fraud (Normile, 2017).”
BackgroundFunding sources of research articles published in anaesthesia journals over 10 years
van Zundert, A. A. J., Grace, S. G., & Wiepking, F. S. S. (2022) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/eja.0000000000001513 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Conclusion: The Dark Side of the Three-Player Game
Janeway, W. H. (2018)
Academic Misconduct in China’s Physiology and Medicine Sector: Trends and Challenges
Bo, Y., Zhang, X., & Wang, X. (2025) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-025-09694-0
“In 2017, Tumor Biology , a journal of the International Society of Oncology and BioMarkers, retracted approximately 100 medical articles from Chinese authors, draw - ing the Chinese government’s attention to AM (Normile, 2017 ).”
- Authors
- Normile, D.
- Corresponding author
- Normile, Dennis
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2017-08-04
- Volume
- 357
- Issue
- 6350
- Pages
- 435-435
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2744811023
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Publishing and Scholarly Communication
- Keywords
- peer review fraud, author misconduct, research integrity, scholarly publishing, China
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review