Cited by 168

Cocaine: plasma concentrations after intranasal application in man.

Van Dyke, C., Barash, P G., Jatlow, P., Byck, R.·1976·Science

Abstract

Cocaine (1.5 milligrams per kilogram) was applied to the nasal mucosa of human subjects. The cocaine persisted in the plasma for 4 to 6 hours and reached peak concentrations of 120 to 474 nanograms per milliliter at 15 to 60 minutes. In that residual cocaine was detectable on the nasal mucosa for 3 hours, continuous absorption secondary to its vasoconstrictive action might explain its persistence in the plasma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.56036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Plasma levels of cocaine in humans who inhale cocaine intranasally range between 0.4 and 1.6 μM.

    “It has been shown that the plasma levels of cocaine in humans who inhale cocaine intranasally ranges between 0.4 and 1.6 μM (Van Dyke et al., 1976) while the plasma cocaine levels in tolerant abusers was found to be 13 μM (Stephens et al., 2004).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Dyke, C., Barash, P. G., Jatlow, P., & Byck, R.
Affiliations
  • Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
  • Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
  • Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510
Venue
Science
Published
1976-02-27
Volume
191
Issue
4229
Pages
859-861
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
168
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review