The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recombination Between Viral RNA and Transgenic Plant Transcripts
Abstract
Transformed plants expressing the 3′ two-thirds of the cowpea chlorotic mottle virus (CCMV) capsid gene were inoculated with a CCMV deletion mutant lacking the 3′ one-third of the capsid gene. Although the deletion inoculum replicates in inoculated cells, systemic infections occur only if recombination restores a functional capsid gene. Four of 125 inoculated transgenic plants, representing three different transgenic lines, became systemically infected. Analysis of viral RNA confirmed that RNA recombination had united the transgenic messenger RNA and the challenging virus through aberrant homologous recombination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Evolutionary aspects of recombination in RNA viruses
Worobey, M., & Holmes, E. C. (1999) · Journal of General Virology · doi:10.1099/0022-1317-80-10-2535 · Cited by 556
PLANT VIRUS GENE VECTORS FOR TRANSIENT EXPRESSION OF FOREIGN PROTEINS IN PLANTS
Scholthof, H. B., Scholthof, K.-B. G., & Jackson, A. O. (1996) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.34.1.299 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Greene, A. E., & Allison, R. F.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1994-03-11
- Volume
- 263
- Issue
- 5152
- Pages
- 1423-1425
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W1993005458
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recombination Between Viral RNA and Transgenic Plant Transcripts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.8128222
- The paper
- Greene, A. E., & Allison, R. F. (1994). Recombination Between Viral RNA and Transgenic Plant Transcripts. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.8128222
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
