Cited by 193Enzyme Structure and FunctionCarbohydrate Chemistry and SynthesisChemical Reaction Mechanisms

A Covalent Enzyme-Substrate Intermediate with Saccharide Distortion in a Mutant T4 Lysozyme

Kuroki, Ryota, Weaver, Larry H., Matthews, Brian W.·1993·Science

Abstract

The glycosyl-enzyme intermediate in lysozyme action has long been considered to be an oxocarbonium ion, although precedent from other glycosidases and theoretical considerations suggest it should be a covalent enzyme-substrate adduct. The mutation of threonine 26 to glutamic acid in the active site cleft of phage T4 lysozyme (T4L) produced an enzyme that cleaved the cell wall of Escherichia coli but left the product covalently bound to the enzyme. The crystalline complex was nonisomorphous with wild-type T4L, and analysis of its structure showed a covalent linkage between the product and the newly introduced glutamic acid 26. The covalently linked sugar ring was substantially distorted, suggesting that distortion of the substrate toward the transition state is important for catalysis, as originally proposed by Phillips. It is also postulated that the adduct formed by the mutant is an intermediate, consistent with a double displacement mechanism of action in which the glycosidic linkage is cleaved with retention of configuration as originally proposed by Koshland. The peptide part of the cell wall fragment displays extensive hydrogen-bonding interactions with the carboxyl-terminal domain of the enzyme, consistent with previous studies of mutations in T4L.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.8266098

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ProGen-generated artificial lysozymes cover the sequence landscape of natural lysozymes across five families with diverse folds, active sites, and mechanisms.

    “Our artificial lysozymes span the sequence landscape of natural lysozymes, Fig. 2a, across five families which contain diverse protein folds, active site architectures, and enzymatic mechanisms49,50.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuroki, R., Weaver, L. H., & Matthews, B. W.
Affiliations
Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Science
Published
1993-12-24
Volume
262
Issue
5142
Pages
2030-2033
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1968938754
Cited by
193
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
11.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM-21967, R01GM021967)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Reaction Mechanisms
Keywords
T4 lysozyme, glycosyl-enzyme intermediate, transition state, ping-pong mechanism, hydrogen bonding, enzyme active site, protein crystal structure
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Binding Sites, Carbohydrate Conformation, Carbohydrate Sequence, Cell Wall, Chickens, Disaccharides, Egg White, Escherichia coli, Molecular Sequence Data, Muramidase, Mutation, Oligopeptides, Peptidoglycan, Bacteriophage T4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review