The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biological Impact of Small Air Ions: Despite a history of contention, there is evidence that small air ions can affect life processes.
Abstract
The thrust of the experimental data presented here is that small air ions are biologically active. There is convincing evidence that both negative and positive ions (i) inhibit growth of bacteria and fungi on solid media; (ii) exert a lethal effect on vegetative forms of bacteria suspended in water when opportunity is provided for contact of cells and ions; and (iii) reduce the viable count of bacterial aerosols. Through physical action, ions of either charge upset the stability of aerosolized bacterial suspensions and, in addition, have a direct lethal effect which is more prominent with negative ions than with positive ions. With regard to the serotonin hypothesis of air ion action, the situation is more complex. The essential fact is that mice and rats display a charge-related metabolic response to air ions and this phenomenon also occurs in humans. Because serotonin is such a potent hormone, the ultimate functional changes incident to air ion action are impressive and account for the signs and symptoms of the sharav syndrome. Alterations in the cumulative mortality rate with three experimental respiratory diseases in the mouse also are charge-dependent, positive ions routinely exercising a detrimental effect. Further, in the case of mice infected with influenza virus, ion deprivation increases the cumulative mortality rate. Since ion depletion is a constant concomitant of modern urban life, one reasonably may speculate about comparable inimical effects on humans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Weather, mood, and helping behavior: Quasi experiments with the sunshine samaritan.
Cunningham, M. R. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.11.1947 · Cited by 555
The assessment of bioaerosols: A critical review
Griffiths, W. D., & DeCosemo, G. A. L. (1994) · Journal of Aerosol Science · doi:10.1016/0021-8502(94)90218-6 · Cited by 215
Much ado about the full moon: a meta-analysis of lunar–lunacy research
Rotton, J., & Kelly, I. W. (1985) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.97.2.286 · Cited by 162
Flory, R., Ametepe, J., & Bowers, B. (2010) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2008.08.011 · Cited by 45
Climatic Conditions in Classrooms
Kevan, S. M., & Howes, J. D. (1980) · Educational Review · doi:10.1080/0013191800320305 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Krueger, A. P., & Reed, E. J.
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 1976-09-24
- Volume
- 193
- Issue
- 4259
- Pages
- 1209-1213
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- OpenAlex
- W2045602174
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Impact of Small Air Ions: Despite a history of contention, there is evidence that small air ions can affect life processes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.959834
- The paper
- Krueger, A. P., & Reed, E. J. (1976). Biological Impact of Small Air Ions: Despite a history of contention, there is evidence that small air ions can affect life processes. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.959834
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.