Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.”

Cited by (473)

Items 101–200 of 473

  1. Exploring Emergent and Poorly Understood Phenomena in the Strangest of Places: The Footprint of Discovery in Replications, Meta-Analyses, and Null Findings
    C. Chet Miller, Peter A Bamberger · 2016 · Academy of Management Discoveries
  2. Statistical Power Analysis and the contemporary “crisis” in social sciences
    Tom Breur · 2016 · Journal of Marketing Analytics
  3. Escaping Paternalism: Rationality, Behavioral Economics, and Public Policy
    Mario J. Rizzo, Glen Whitman · 2019
  4. From Outcome to Process Focus: Fostering a More Robust Psychological Science Through Registered Reports and Results-Blind Reviewing
    James Andrew Grand, Steven G. Rogelberg, George C. Banks, Ronald S. Landis, Scott Tonidandel · 2018 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
  5. The Evolution of Behavior Analysis: Toward a Replication Crisis?
    Matthew L. Locey · 2020 · Perspectives on Behavior Science
  6. Putting Popper to work
    Maarten Derksen · 2019 · Theory & Psychology
  7. A Causal Replication Framework for Designing and Assessing Replication Efforts
    Peter M. Steiner, Vivian C. Wong, Kylie Anglin · 2019 · Zeitschrift für Psychologie
  8. Making Every Study Count: Learning From Replication Failure to Improve Intervention Research
    James S. Kim · 2019 · Educational Researcher
  9. Advances in transparency and reproducibility in the social sciences
    Jeremy Freese A, Tamkinat Rauf, Jan Gerrit Voelkel · 2022 · Social Science Research
  10. A visual tool for defining reproducibility and replicability
    Prasad Patil, Roger D. Peng, Jeffrey T. Leek · 2019 · Nature Human Behaviour
  11. Toward Open and Reproducible Epidemiology
    Maya B. Mathur, Matthew P. Fox · 2023 · American Journal of Epidemiology
  12. Facial affect processing in incarcerated violent males: A systematic review
    Harriet Chapman, Steven M. Gillespie, Ian Mitchell · 2017 · Aggression and Violent Behavior
  13. Proposal of a Selection Protocol for Replication of Studies in Sports and Exercise Science
    Jennifer Murphy, Cristian Mesquida, Aaron R. Caldwell, Brian David Earp, Joe P. Warne · 2022 · Sports Medicine
  14. Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy
    Florián Cova, Brent Strickland, Angela Abatista, Aurélien Allard, James Andow, Mario Attie, James R. Beebe, Renatas Berniûnas, Jordane Boudesseul, Matteo Colombo et al. · 2018
  15. Design and Analysis of Replication Studies
    Douglas G. Bonett · 2020 · Organizational Research Methods
  16. The Effect of Replications on Citation Patterns: Evidence From a Large-Scale Reproducibility Project
    Felix Schafmeister · 2021 · Psychological Science
  17. Identification of and correction for publication bias
    Maximilian Kasy, Isaiah Andrews · 2018 · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints)
  18. Reproducibility in Psychological Science: When Do Psychological Phenomena Exist?
    Seppo E. Iso‐Ahola · 2017 · Frontiers in Psychology
  19. A collaborative approach to infant research: Promoting reproducibility, best practices, and theory-building
    Michael C. Frank · 2016
  20. Minimal intervention delivered by 2-1-1 information and referral specialists promotes smoke-free homes among 2-1-1 callers: a Texas generalisation trial
    Patricia Dolan Mullen, Lara S. Savas, Łucja Bundy, Regine Haardörfer, Mel Hovell, María E. Fernández, J Monroy, Rebecca S. Williams, Matthew W. Kreuter, David Jobe et al. · 2016 · Tobacco Control
  21. A Replication Agenda for Composition Studies
    John Raucci · 2021 · College Composition and Communication
  22. Probabilistic forecasting of replication studies
    Samuel Pawel, Leonhard Held · 2020 · PLoS ONE
  23. A theory and methodology to quantify knowledge
    Daniele Fanelli · 2019 · Royal Society Open Science
  24. Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research
    Garret Christensen, Edward A. Miguel · 2016 · National Bureau of Economic Research
  25. Measurement equivalence in replications of experiments: when and why it matters and guidance on how to determine equivalence
    Sebastian Jilke, Nicolai Petrovsky, Bart Meuleman, Oliver James · 2016 · Public Management Review
  26. Psychology’s Replication Crisis as Scientific Opportunity: A Précis for Policymakers
    Joseph Lee Rodgers, Patrick E. Shrout · 2017 · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  27. Statistical positivism versus critical scientific realism. A comparison of two paradigms for motivation research: Part 1. A philosophical and empirical analysis of statistical positivism
    Valery Chirkov, Jade Anderson · 2018 · Theory & Psychology
  28. Ego Depletion May Disappear by 2020
    Miguel Angel Vadillo · 2019 · Social Psychology
  29. Moderation of classic social psychological effects by demographics in the U.S. adult population: New opportunities for theoretical advancement.
    David Scott Yeager, Jon A. Krosnick, Penny S. Visser, Allyson L. Holbrook, Alexander M. Tahk · 2019 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  30. Enhancing reproducibility: Failures from Reproducibility Initiatives underline core challenges
    Mullane, Kevin, Williams, Michael · 2017 · Biochemical Pharmacology
  31. From Discovery to Justification: Outline of an Ideal Research Program in Empirical Psychology
    Erich H. Witte, Frank Zenker · 2017 · Frontiers in Psychology
  32. Supporting replication research in management journals: Qualitative analysis of editorials published between 1970 and 2015
    Przemysław G. Hensel · 2018 · European Management Journal
  33. Pre-registration and Results-Free Review in Observational and Qualitative Research
    Alan M. Jacobs · 2020 · Cambridge University Press eBooks
  34. Predict, Control, and Replicate to Understand: How Statistics Can Foster the Fundamental Goals of Science
    Peter R. Killeen · 2018 · Perspectives on Behavior Science
  35. Priority Challenges for Social and Behavioral Research and Its Modeling
    Paul K Davis, Angela O’Mahony, Timothy R. Gulden, Osonde Osoba, Katharine Sieck · 2018 · RAND Corporation eBooks
  36. Toward open science in PLS-SEM: Assessing the state of the art and future perspectives
    Susanne Jana Adler, Pratyush Nidhi Sharma, Lăcrămioara Radomir · 2023 · Journal of Business Research
  37. Examining reproducibility in psychology: A hybrid method for combining a statistically significant original study and a replication
    Robbie C. M. van Aert, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen · 2017 · Behavior Research Methods
  38. Double trouble? The communication dimension of the reproducibility crisis in experimental psychology and neuroscience
    Witold M. Hensel · 2020 · European Journal for Philosophy of Science
  39. Volunteer Science
    Jason Pilny Radford, Andy Pilny, Ashley V. Reichelmann, Brian Keegan, Brooke Foucault Welles, Jefferson Hoye, Katherine Ognyanova, Waleed M. Meleis, David M. J. Lazer · 2016 · Social Psychology Quarterly
  40. The Safety of Autonomous Vehicles: Lessons from Philosophy of Science
    D. Hicks · 2018 · IEEE Technology and Society Magazine
  41. Best practices in replication: a case study of common information in coordination games
    Roy Chen, Yan Chen, Yohanes E. Riyanto · 2020 · Experimental Economics
  42. How accurately do teachers’ judge students? Re-analysis of Hoge and Coladarci (1989) meta-analysis
    Esther Kaufmann · 2020 · Contemporary Educational Psychology
  43. Assessing and Improving Robustness of Psychological Research Findings in Four Steps
    Michèle B. Nuijten · 2022 · Springer eBooks
  44. Open Science
    Barbara A. Spellman, Elizabeth Ann Gilbert, Katherine S. Corker · 2018 · Wiley eBooks
  45. The necessity of construct and external validity for deductive causal inference
    Kevin Esterling, David Brady, Eric Schwitzgebel · 2025 · Journal of Causal Inference
  46. Curating identifiable data for sharing: The databrary project
    Rick Owen Gilmore, Karen E. Adolph, David S. Millman · 2016 · New York Scientific Data Summit (NYSDS)
  47. A Quantitative Synthesis of Early Language Acquisition Using Meta-Analysis
    Molly L. Lewis, Mika Braginsky, Sho Tsuji, Christina Bergmann, Page Elizabeth Piccinini, Alejandrina Cristià, Michael C. Frank · 2016
  48. Advancing Transparency and Openness in Child Development Research: Opportunities
    Lisa A. Gennetian, Catherine S. Tamis‐LeMonda, Michael C. Frank · 2020 · Child Development Perspectives
  49. Replikationskrise, p-hacking und Open Science
    Johannes Brachem, Maximilian Frank, Tatiana Kvetnaya, Leonhard Falk Florentin Schramm, Leonhard Volz · 2022 · Psychologische Rundschau
  50. Pseudotheory proliferation is damaging the organizational sciences
    Jeffrey M. Cucina, Michael A. McDaniel · 2016 · Journal of Organizational Behavior
  51. Another step towards scientific transparency: Requiring research materials for publication
    Jon E. Grahe · 2017 · The Journal of Social Psychology
  52. Improving Social Science: Lessons from the Open Science Movement
    Per Engzell, Julia M. Rohrer · 2020 · PS Political Science & Politics
  53. MRI-based basal forebrain atrophy and volumetric signatures associated with limbic TDP-43 compared to Alzheimer's disease pathology
    Stefan Johannes Teipel, Michel J. Grothe · 2023 · Neurobiology of Disease
  54. Belastbare und effiziente Wissenschaft
    Andreas Glöckner, Susann Fiedler, Frank Renkewitz · 2018 · Psychologische Rundschau
  55. Changing the logic of replication: A case from infant studies
    Francesco Margoni, Martin Shepperd · 2020 · Infant Behavior and Development
  56. Replication studies in the Netherlands: Lessons learned and recommendations for funders, publishers and editors, and universities
    Maarten Derksen, Stephanie Meirmans, Jonna Brenninkmeijer, Jeannette J. Pols, Annemarijn R de Boer, Hans Van Eyghen, Surya Gayet, Rolf H. H. Groenwold, Dennis Hernaus, Pim Huijnen et al. · 2024 · Accountability in Research
  57. Toward open science in marketing research
    Lachlan Deer, Susanne Jana Adler, Hannes Datta, Natalie Mizik, Marko Sarstedt · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Marketing
  58. Replication is fundamental, but is it common? A call for scientific self-reflection and contemporary research practices in gambling-related research
    Debi A. LaPlante · 2019 · International Gambling Studies
  59. What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman–Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications
    Mark Rubin · 2019 · Synthese
  60. Has Stereotype Threat Dissipated Over Time? A Cross-Temporal Meta-Analysis
    Neil Anthony Lewis, Nicholas Michael Michalak · 2019 · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints)
  61. From Gutenberg to Open Science: An Unfulfilled Odyssey
    Chris R. Triggle, David J. Triggle · 2016 · Drug Development Research
  62. How to trust a scientist
    Jeroen de Ridder · 2022 · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
  63. Précis ofTalking to Our Selves: Reflection, Ignorance, and Agency
    John M. Doris · 2016 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  64. Why social status matters for understanding the interrelationships between testosterone, economic risk‐taking, and gender
    Susan Rebecca Fisk, Brennan J. Miller, Jon Overton · 2017 · Sociology Compass
  65. The uphill battle for action-specific perception
    Emily L. Laitin, Michael J. Tymoski, Nathan L. Tenhundfeld, Jessica K. Witt · 2019 · Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  66. Psychology’s reproducibility problem is exaggerated – say psychologists
    Monya Baker · 2016 · Nature
  67. Evaluating Psychological Research Requires More Than Attention to the N
    Norbert Schwarz, Gerald L. Clore · 2016 · Psychological Science
  68. Trails of Data: Three Cases for Collecting Web Information for Social Science Research
    Fumin Li, Yisu Zhou, Tianji Cai · 2019 · Social Science Computer Review
  69. Dude, Where’s My Treatment Effect? Errors in Administrative Data Linking and the Destruction of Statistical Power in Randomized Experiments
    Sarah Tahamont, Zubin Jelveh, Aaron J. Chalfin, Shi Yan, Benjamin Hansen · 2020 · Journal of Quantitative Criminology
  70. Wired to be connected? Links between mobile technology engagement, intertemporal preference and frontostriatal white matter connectivity
    Henry H. Wilmer, William Heyward Hampton, Thomas M. Olino, Ingrid R. Olson, Jason M. Chein · 2019 · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
  71. Is the Political Slant of Psychology Research Related to Scientific Replicability?
    Diego A. Reinero, Julian Augustus Wills, William J. Brady, Peter Mende‐Siedlecki, Jarret T. Crawford, Jay Joseph Van Bavel · 2020 · Perspectives on Psychological Science
  72. Convenient but biased? The reliability of convenience samples in research about attitudes toward climate change
    Matthew H. Goldberg, Sander van der Linden, Matthew Thomas Ballew, Seth A. Rosenthal, Anthony Leiserowitz · 2019 · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)
  73. Inter-study and intra-study replications in leading marketing journals: a longitudinal analysis
    Eun Sook Kwon, Shan Yan, Joong Suk Lee, Leonard N. Reid · 2017 · European Journal of Marketing
  74. Trombones Elicit Bitter More Strongly Than Do Clarinets: a Partial Replication of Three Studies of Crisinel and Spence
    Quentin J. Watson, Karen L. Gunther · 2017 · Multisensory Research
  75. On the Merits and Limits of Replication and Negation for IS Research
    Sebastian Olbrich, Ulrich Frank, Shirley Diane Gregor, Fred Niederman, Frantz Rowe · 2017 · AIS Transactions on Replication Research
  76. Replication and the Establishment of Scientific Truth
    Seppo E. Iso‐Ahola · 2020 · Frontiers in Psychology
  77. Reproducibility in Psychology: Theoretical Distinction of Different Types of Replications
    Aleksandar Baucal, Alex Gillespie, Ksenija Krstić, Tania Zittoun · 2019 · Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science
  78. Quality science from quality measurement: The role of measurement type with respect to replication and effect size magnitude in psychological research
    Diana Eugenie Kornbrot, Richard J. Wiseman, George J. Georgiou · 2018 · PLoS ONE
  79. Norms for Behavioral Change (NBC) model: How injunctive norms and enforcement shift descriptive norms in science
    Jeremy A. Yip, Maurice E. Schweitzer · 2022 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  80. On the significance of statistically insignificant results in consumer behavior experiments
    Robert A. Peterson, U. N. Umesh · 2017 · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  81. Revisiting a Criminological Classic: The Cycle of Violence
    Wesley Myers, Kristin M. Lloyd, Jillian J. Turanovic, Travis C. Pratt · 2018 · Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice
  82. Identification of and Correction for Publication Bias
    Isaiah Andrews, Maximilian Kasy · 2017 · National Bureau of Economic Research
  83. Incentives and the replication crisis in social sciences: A critical review of open science practices
    Loukas Balafoutas, Jérémy Celse, Alexandros Karakostas, Nicholas Umashev · 2024 · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
  84. What Psychology Teachers Should Know About Open Science and the New Statistics
    Beth Morling, Robert J Calin-Jageman · 2020 · Teaching of Psychology
  85. Publication Biases in Replication Studies
    Adam J. Berinsky, James N. Druckman, Teppei Yamamoto · 2020 · Political Analysis
  86. The Effect of Backloading Instructions on Eyewitness Identification from Simultaneous and Sequential Lineups
    Curt A. Carlson, Maria A. Carlson, Dawn R. Weatherford, Amanda Tucker, Jane E. Bednarz · 2016 · Applied Cognitive Psychology
  87. A systematic review of Drosophila short-term-memory genetics: Meta-analysis reveals robust reproducibility
    Tayfun Tumkaya, Stanislav Ott, Adam Claridge‐Chang · 2018 · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  88. Above a swamp: A theory of high-quality scientific production
    Bralind Kiri, Nicola Lacetera, Lorenzo Zirulia · 2018 · Research Policy
  89. Statistical methods for replicability assessment
    Kenneth E. Hung, William Fithian · 2020 · The Annals of Applied Statistics
  90. Quantity Over Quality? Reproducible Psychological Science from a Mixed Methods Perspective
    Hollen N. Reischer, Henry R. Cowan · 2020 · Collabra Psychology
  91. Measuring the effects of publication bias in political science
    Justin Esarey, Ahra Wu · 2016 · Research & Politics
  92. A Bayes Factor for Replications of ANOVA Results
    Christopher Harms · 2018 · The American Statistician
  93. A Social Psychological Model of Scientific Practices: Explaining Research Practices and Outlining the Potential for Successful Reforms
    Lee J. Jussim, Jon A. Krosnick, Sean T. Stevens, Stephanie M. Anglin · 2019 · Psychologica Belgica
  94. Idiographic Psychology: From Forms of Inference to Levels of Analysis, and Back Again
    Moin Syed · 2022
  95. The sociocultural movement in psychology, the role of theories in sociocultural inquiries, and the theory of sociocultural models
    Valery Chirkov · 2020 · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology
  96. Reproducibility Starts from You Today
    Yasemin Türkyilmaz-van der Velden, Nicolas Dintzner, Marta Teperek · 2020 · Patterns
  97. How (not) to measure replication
    Samuel C. Fletcher · 2021 · European Journal for Philosophy of Science
  98. Optimizing Research Output: How Can Psychological Research Methods Be Improved?
    Jeff O. Miller, Rolf Ulrich · 2021 · Annual Review of Psychology
  99. How failure to falsify in high-volume science contributes to the replication crisis
    Sarah Michele Rajtmajer, Timothy M. Errington, Frank Gerard Hillary · 2022 · eLife
  100. The Importance of Replication in Measurement Research: Using Curriculum-Based Measures With Postsecondary Students With Developmental Disabilities
    John L. Hosp, Jeremy W. Ford, Sally M. Huddle, Kiersten Hensley · 2017 · Assessment for Effective Intervention