Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.”

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

Open Science Collaboration (2015) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aac4716 · Cited by 8,515 · see citing works

False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant

Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797611417632 · Cited by 6,567 · see citing works

Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project

Klein, R. A., Ratliff, K. A., Vianello, M., Adams, R. B., Bahník, Š., Bernstein, M. J., Bocian, K., Brandt, M. J., Brooks, B., Brumbaugh, C. C., et al. (2014) · Social Psychology · doi:10.1027/1864-9335/a000178 · Cited by 1,208 · see citing works

A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation.

Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.116 · Cited by 618 · see citing works

Why do implicit and explicit attitude tests diverge? The role of structural fit.

Payne, B. K., Burkley, M. A., & Stokes, M. B. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.16 · Cited by 401 · see citing works

Detecting the Snake in the Grass

LoBue, V., & DeLoache, J. S. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02081.x · Cited by 382 · see citing works

Toward a Physiology of Dual-Process Reasoning and Judgment: Lemonade, Willpower, and Expensive Rule-Based Analysis

Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02077.x · Cited by 331 · see citing works

Dynamics of self-regulation: How (un)accomplished goal actions affect motivation.

Koo, M., & Ayelet Fishbach, B. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.183 · Cited by 291 · see citing works

Why people are reluctant to tempt fate.

Risen, J. L., & Gilovich, T. (2008) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.2.293 · Cited by 138 · see citing works

Replication Data for: Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.”

Gilbert, D. K., King, G., Pettigrew, S., & Wilson, T. (2016) · Harvard Dataverse · doi:10.7910/dvn/5lkvh2 · Cited by 1 · see citing works

Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015

Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T.-H., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., et al. (2018) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z · Cited by 1,521 · see citing works

What does research reproducibility mean?

Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaf5027 · Cited by 1,293 · see citing works

Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings

Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams, R. B., Alper, S., Aveyard, M., Axt, J. R., Babalola, M. T., Bahník, Š., et al. (2018) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245918810225 · Cited by 944 · see citing works

Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science

Nosek, B. A., Hardwicke, T. E., Moshontz, H., Allard, A., Corker, K. S., Dreber, A., Fidler, F., Hilgard, J., Kline Struhl, M., Nuijten, M. B., et al. (2022) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157 · Cited by 770 · see citing works

A problem in theory

Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-018-0522-1 · Cited by 676 · see citing works

Psychology's Renaissance

Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J., & Simonsohn, U. (2018) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836 · Cited by 548 · see citing works

Generalizing from Survey Experiments Conducted on Mechanical Turk: A Replication Approach

Coppock, A. (2019) · Political Science Research and Methods · doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.10 · Cited by 515 · see citing works

Behavioural science is unlikely to change the world without a heterogeneity revolution

Bryan, C. J., Tipton, E., & Yeager, D. S. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01143-3 · Cited by 547 · see citing works

Small is beautiful: In defense of the small-N design

Smith, P. L., & Little, D. R. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-018-1451-8 · Cited by 466 · see citing works

Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics Research

Christensen, G., & Miguel, E. A. (2018) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.20171350 · Cited by 448 · see citing works

Identification of and correction for publication bias

Andrews, I., & Kasy, M. (2019) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20180310 · Cited by 388 · see citing works

Contextual sensitivity in scientific reproducibility

Van Bavel, J. J., Mende-Siedlecki, P., Brady, W. J., & Reinero, D. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1521897113 · Cited by 398 · see citing works

Exploratory Research

Swedberg, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.002 · Cited by 408 · see citing works

Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology

Errington, T. M., Mathur, M., Soderberg, C. K., Denis, A., Perfito, N., Iorns, E., & Nosek, B. A. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.71601 · Cited by 393 · see citing works

Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: A consensus and critical position paper

Buch, E. R., Santarnecchi, E., Antal, A., Jan Born, A., Celnik, P. A., Claßen, J., Gerloff, C. P., Hallett, M., Hummel, F. C., Nitsche, M. A., et al. (2017) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2017.01.004 · Cited by 351 · see citing works

A Collaborative Approach to Infant Research: Promoting Reproducibility, Best Practices, and Theory‐Building

Frank, M. C., Bergelson, E., Bergmann, C., Cristià, A., Floccia, C., Gervain, J., Hamlin, J. K., Hannon, E. E., Struhl, M. K., Levelt, C. C., et al. (2017) · Infancy · doi:10.1111/infa.12182 · Cited by 333 · see citing works

Replication in Social Science

Jeremy Freese, A., & Peterson, D. (2017) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053450 · Cited by 323 · see citing works

Predicting risk and outcomes for frail older adults: an umbrella review of frailty screening tools

Apóstolo, J., Cooke, R. W. I., Campos, E. B., Santana, S., Marcucci, M., Cano, A., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M. M. R., Germini, F., & Holland, C. (2017) · The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/jbisrir-2016-003018 · Cited by 241 · see citing works

The experimental evidence for parapsychological phenomena: A review.

Cardeña, E. (2018) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000236 · Cited by 221 · see citing works

Reproducibility and replicability of rodent phenotyping in preclinical studies

Kafkafi, N., Agassi, J., Chesler, E. J., Crabbe, J. C., Crusio, W. E., Eilam, D., Gerlai, R., Golani, I., Gomez-Marin, A., Heller, R., et al. (2018) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.01.003 · Cited by 215 · see citing works

Play It Again, Sam! An Analysis of Constructive Replication in the Organizational Sciences

Köhler, T., & Cortina, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206319843985 · Cited by 204 · see citing works

Reliability of the chronic mild stress model of depression: A user survey

Willner, P. (2017) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2016.08.001 · Cited by 198 · see citing works

Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”

Anderson, C., Bahník, Š., Barnett‐Cowan, M., Bosco, F. A., Chandler, J., Chartier, C. R., Cheung, F., Christopherson, C. D., Cordes, A., Cremata, E. J., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad9163 · Cited by 189 · see citing works

What is science’s crisis really about?

Saltelli, A., & Funtowicz, S. (2017) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.010 · Cited by 188 · see citing works

Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy

Cova, F., Strickland, B., Abatista, A., Allard, A., Andow, J., Attie, M., Beebe, J. R., Berniûnas, R., Boudesseul, J., Colombo, M., et al. (2018) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-018-0400-9 · Cited by 184 · see citing works

Does Talking on a Cell Phone, With a Passenger, or Dialing Affect Driving Performance? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies

Caird, J. K., Simmons, S. M., Wiley, K., Johnston, K. A., & Horrey, W. J. (2018) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720817748145 · Cited by 180 · see citing works

The New Statistics for Better Science: Ask How Much, How Uncertain, and What Else Is Known

Calin-Jageman, R. J., & Cumming, G. (2019) · The American Statistician · doi:10.1080/00031305.2018.1518266 · Cited by 170 · see citing works

A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science

Leible, S., Steffen Schlager, C., Schubotz, M., & Gipp, B. (2019) · Frontiers in Blockchain · doi:10.3389/fbloc.2019.00016 · Cited by 176 · see citing works

Attitudes Towards Science

Rutjens, B. T., Heine, S. J., Sutton, R. M., & van Harreveld, F. (2017) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2017.08.001 · Cited by 154 · see citing works

Evidence-based policymaking: promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research

Leuz, C. (2018) · Accounting and Business Research · doi:10.1080/00014788.2018.1470151 · Cited by 153 · see citing works

Replication in Criminology and the Social Sciences

Pridemore, W. A., Makel, M. C., & Plucker, J. A. (2017) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-032317-091849 · Cited by 152 · see citing works

Researchers’ Intuitions About Power in Psychological Research

Bakker, M., Hartgerink, C. H. J., Wicherts, J. M., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2016) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797616647519 · Cited by 147 · see citing works

The Production of Knowledge

(2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519 · Cited by 135 · see citing works

Addressing the “Replication Crisis”: Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power

Anderson, S. F., & Maxwell, S. E. (2017) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2017.1289361 · Cited by 133 · see citing works

Open Science Practices are on the Rise: The State of Social Science (3S) SurveyPreprint

Christensen, G., Wang, Z., Paluck, E. L., Swanson, N., Birke, D. J., Miguel, E. A., & Littman, R. (2019) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/5rksu · Cited by 127 · see citing works

The Emergence of Contextual Social Psychology

Pettigrew, T. F. (2018) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167218756033 · Cited by 122 · see citing works

No Replication, No Trust? How Low Replicability Influences Trust in Psychology

Wingen, T., Berkessel, J. B., & Englich, B. (2019) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619877412 · Cited by 121 · see citing works

Replication studies in economics—How many and which papers are chosen for replication, and why?

Mueller‐Langer, F., Fecher, B., Harhoff, D., & Wagner, G. G. (2018) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.019 · Cited by 118 · see citing works

What Is Meant by “Replication” and Why Does It Encounter Resistance in Economics?

Duvendack, M., Palmer‐Jones, R., & Reed, W. R. (2017) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.p20171031 · Cited by 118 · see citing works

Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015Preprint

Camerer, C. F., Dreber, A., Holzmeister, F., Ho, T., Huber, J., Johannesson, M., Kirchler, M., Nave, G., Nosek, B. A., Pfeiffer, T., et al. (2018) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/4hmb6 · Cited by 117 · see citing works

The state of social and personality science: Rotten to the core, not so bad, getting better, or getting worse?

Motyl, M. S., Demos, A. P., Carsel, T. S., Hanson, B. E., Melton, Z. J., Mueller, A. B., Prims, J., Sun, J., Washburn, A. N., Wong, K., et al. (2017) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000084 · Cited by 109 · see citing works

Predicting Ideological Prejudice

Brandt, M. J. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617693004 · Cited by 105 · see citing works

Many Labs 5: Testing Pre-Data-Collection Peer Review as an Intervention to Increase Replicability

Ebersole, C. R., Mathur, M. B., Baranski, E., Bart-Plange, D.-J., Buttrick, N. R., Chartier, C. R., Corker, K. S., Corley, M., Hartshorne, J. K., IJzerman, H., et al. (2020) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245920958687 · Cited by 105 · see citing works

Progress toward openness, transparency, and reproducibility in cognitive neuroscience

Gilmore, R. O., Diaz, M. T., Wyble, B. A., & Yarkoni, T. (2017) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13325 · Cited by 95 · see citing works

What Is a Replication?

Machery, É. (2020) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/709701 · Cited by 95 · see citing works

Z-curve 2.0: Estimating Replication Rates and Discovery Rates

Bartos̆, F., & Schimmack, U. (2022) · Meta-Psychology · doi:10.15626/mp.2021.2720 · Cited by 92 · see citing works

A statistical definition for reproducibility and replicabilityPreprint

Patil, P., Peng, R. D., & Leek, J. T. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/066803 · Cited by 90 · see citing works

An Overview of Scientific Reproducibility: Consideration of Relevant Issues for Behavior Science/Analysis

Laraway, S., Snycerski, S., Pradhan, S., & Huitema, B. E. (2019) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-019-00193-3 · Cited by 87 · see citing works

Survey of open science practices and attitudes in the social sciences

Ferguson, J., Littman, R., Christensen, G., Paluck, E. L., Swanson, N., Wang, Z., Miguel, E. A., Birke, D. J., & Pezzuto, J.-H. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41111-1 · Cited by 86 · see citing works

To Replicate or Not to Replicate? Exploring Reproducibility in Economics through the Lens of a Model and a Pilot Study

Maniadis, Z., Tufano, F., & List, J. A. (2017) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/ecoj.12527 · Cited by 84 · see citing works

Some Advances in the Design of Survey Experiments

Sniderman, P. M. (2018) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-042716-115726 · Cited by 84 · see citing works

Perception science in the age of deep neural networks.

VanRullen, R. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00142 · Cited by 82 · see citing works

Video can make behavioural science more reproducible

Gilmore, R. O., & Adolph, K. E. (2017) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-017-0128 · Cited by 81 · see citing works

Preregistration Is Neither Sufficient nor Necessary for Good Science

Pham, M. T., & Oh, T. T. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.1209 · Cited by 85 · see citing works

Escaping Paternalism

Rizzo, M. J., & Whitman, G. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781139061810 · Cited by 125 · see citing works

Stress hypothesis overload: 131 hypotheses exploring the role of stress in tradeoffs, transitions, and health

Harris, B. N. (2019) · General and Comparative Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2019.113355 · Cited by 76 · see citing works

Pre-registration: Weighing costs and benefits for researchers

Logg, J. M., & Dorison, C. A. (2021) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2021.05.006 · Cited by 69 · see citing works

Self-correction in science: The diagnostic and integrative motives for replication

Peterson, D., & Panofsky, A. L. (2021) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127211005551 · Cited by 73 · see citing works

Evidence-Based Policymaking: Promise, Challenges and Opportunities for Accounting and Financial Markets Research

Leuz, C. (2018) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w24535 · Cited by 72 · see citing works

Statistical analyses for studying replication: Meta-analytic perspectives.

Hedges, L. V., & Schauer, J. M. (2018) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000189 · Cited by 69 · see citing works

The quest for an optimal alpha

Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208631 · Cited by 63 · see citing works

Point estimates, Simpson’s paradox, and nonergodicity in biological sciences

Mangalam, M., & Kelty‐Stephen, D. G. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.017 · Cited by 68 · see citing works

Replicating and fixing failed replications: The case of need for cognition and argument quality

Luttrell, A., Petty, R., & Xu, M.-R. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.09.006 · Cited by 64 · see citing works

Replicator degrees of freedom allow publication of misleading failures to replicate

Bryan, C. J., Yeager, D. S., & O’Brien, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1910951116 · Cited by 70 · see citing works

Reproducibility in Accounting Research: Views of the Research Community

Hail, L., Lang, M. H., & Leuz, C. (2020) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12305 · Cited by 67 · see citing works

Perceived crisis and reforms: Issues, explanations, and remedies.

de Boeck, P. A. L., & Jeon, M. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000154 · Cited by 67 · see citing works

More Than One Replication Study Is Needed for Unambiguous Tests of Replication

Hedges, L. V., & Schauer, J. M. (2019) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/1076998619852953 · Cited by 64 · see citing works

Evaluative Spillovers from Technological Change: The Effects of “DNA Envy” on Occupational Practices in Forensic Science

Bechky, B. A. (2019) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0001839219855329 · Cited by 64 · see citing works

Employees’ financial insecurity and health: The underlying role of stress and work–family conflict appraisals

Odle‐Dusseau, H. N., Matthews, R. A., & Wayne, J. H. (2018) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1111/joop.12216 · Cited by 61 · see citing works

Behavioral Public Administration: Combining Insights from Public Administration and Psychology

Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Jilke, S., Olsen, A. L., & Tummers, L. G. (2016) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12609 · Cited by 61 · see citing works

Improving Psychological Science through Transparency and Openness: An Overview

Hales, A. H., Wesselmann, E. D., & Hilgard, J. (2018) · Perspectives on Behavior Science · doi:10.1007/s40614-018-00186-8 · Cited by 61 · see citing works

The Emergence of Statistical Objectivity: Changing Ideas of Epistemic Vice and Virtue in Science

Jeremy Freese, A., & Peterson, D. (2018) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275118794987 · Cited by 60 · see citing works

From old school to open science: The implications of new research norms for educational psychology and beyond

Gehlbach, H., & Robinson, C. D. (2021) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/00461520.2021.1898961 · Cited by 46 · see citing works

How Powerful is the Evidence in Criminology? On Whether We Should Fear a Coming Crisis of Confidence

Barnes, J. C., TenEyck, M. F., Pratt, T. C., & Cullen, F. T. (2019) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2018.1495252 · Cited by 59 · see citing works

Bayesian evaluation of effect size after replicating an original study

van Aert, R. C. M., & van Assen, M. A. L. M. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175302 · Cited by 53 · see citing works

Strengthening the foundation of educational psychology by integrating construct validation into open science reform

Flake, J. K. (2021) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2021.1898962 · Cited by 58 · see citing works

Science is not a signal detection problem

Wilson, B. M., Harris, C. R., & Wixted, J. T. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1914237117 · Cited by 56 · see citing works

Examining the generalizability of research findings from archival data

Delios, A., Clemente, E. G., Wu, T., Tan, H., Wang, Y., Gordon, M., Viganola, D., Chen, Z., Dreber, A., Johannesson, M., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2120377119 · Cited by 56 · see citing works

The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them)

Wicherts, J. M. (2017) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani7120090 · Cited by 53 · see citing works

Improving the rigor of psychophysiology research

Baldwin, S. A. (2016) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.04.006 · Cited by 53 · see citing works

Null hypothesis significance testing and Type I error: The domain problem

Trafimow, D., & Earp, B. (2017) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.01.002 · Cited by 57 · see citing works

Infants’ false belief understanding: A non-replication of the helping task

Crivello, C., & Poulin‐Dubois, D. (2017) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.10.003 · Cited by 52 · see citing works

A Systems-Based Approach to Fostering Robust Science in Industrial-Organizational Psychology

Grand, J. A., Rogelberg, S. G., Allen, T. D., Landis, R. S., Reynolds, D. H., Scott, J. C., Tonidandel, S., & Truxillo, D. M. (2018) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2017.55 · Cited by 52 · see citing works

Open science, closed doors: The perils and potential of open science for research in practice

Guzzo, R. A., Schneider, B., & Nalbantian, H. R. (2022) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2022.61 · Cited by 52 · see citing works

Communicating What We Know and What Isn’t So: Science Communication in Psychology

Lewis, N. A., & Wai, J. (2021) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620964062 · Cited by 50 · see citing works

Transparency, Reproducibility, and the Credibility of Economics ResearchPreprint

Christensen, G., & Miguel, E. A. (2017) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/9a3rw · Cited by 57 · see citing works

The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative

Amaral, O. B., Neves, K., Wasilewska‐Sampaio, A. P., & Carneiro, C. F. D. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.41602 · Cited by 56 · see citing works

Open Science: What, Why, and HowPreprint

Spellman, B., Gilbert, E. A., & Corker, K. S. (2017) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ak6jr · Cited by 50 · see citing works

Seven Pervasive Statistical Flaws in Cognitive Training Interventions

Moreau, D., Kirk, I. J., & Waldie, K. E. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00153 · Cited by 49 · see citing works

Replication without repeating ourselves: Addressing the replication crisis in operations and supply chain management research

Pagell, M. (2020) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1120 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

High Replicability of Newly-Discovered Social-behavioral Findings is AchievablePreprint

Protzko, J., Krosnick, J. A., Nelson, L. D., Nosek, B. A., Axt, J. R., Berent, M. K., Buttrick, N., DeBell, M., Ebersole, C. R., Lundmark, S., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/n2a9x · Cited by 48 · see citing works

Replication in computing education research: researcher attitudes and experiences

Ahadi, A., Hellas, A., Ihantola, P., Korhonen, A., & Petersen, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 16th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research · doi:10.1145/2999541.2999554 · Cited by 48 · see citing works

What Can We Learn from Many Labs Replications?

Stroebe, W. (2019) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2019.1577736 · Cited by 34 · see citing works

Gut microbiota dysbiosis and Huntington's disease: Exploring the gut-brain axis and novel microbiota-based interventions

Sharma, G., Biswas, S. S., Mishra, J., Navik, U., Kandimalla, R. J. L., Reddy, P. H., Bhatti, G. K., & Bhatti, J. S. (2023) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121882 · Cited by 46 · see citing works

Revisiting the revisit: added evidence for a social chemosignal in human emotional tears

Sobel, N. (2016) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1177488 · Cited by 47 · see citing works

Too Good to be False: Nonsignificant Results Revisited

Hartgerink, C., Wicherts, J., & van Assen, M. (2017) · Collabra Psychology · doi:10.1525/collabra.71 · Cited by 46 · see citing works

Improving the Replicability of Psychological Science Through Pedagogy

Hawkins, R. X. D., Smith, E. N., Au, C., Arias, J. M., Catapano, R., Hermann, E., Keil, M., Lampinen, A. K., Raposo, S., Reynolds, J., et al. (2018) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245917740427 · Cited by 46 · see citing works

Practical Methodological Reform Needs Good Theory

Gervais, W. M. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620977471 · Cited by 37 · see citing works

Replication initiatives will not salvage the trustworthiness of psychology

Coyne, J. C. (2016) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-016-0134-3 · Cited by 44 · see citing works

Comment on: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349, 943 (2015), with a response from the Open Science Collaboration

Ropovik, I. (2015) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.1131.9769

Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science

Nosek, B. A., Cohoon, J., Kidwell, M., & Spies, J. R. (2016) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/447b3 · Cited by 88 · see citing works

Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.pptx

Hua, L. (2018) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.7144541

An Open, Large-Scale, Collaborative Effort to Estimate the Reproducibility of Psychological Science

Open Science Collaboration (2012) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691612462588 · Cited by 605 · see citing works

Response to Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”

Anderson, C., Bahník, Š., Barnett‐Cowan, M., Bosco, F. A., Chandler, J., Chartier, C. R., Cheung, F., Christopherson, C. D., Cordes, A., Cremata, E. J., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad9163 · Cited by 189 · see citing works