Cited by 2,215Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureCold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks

Open access

Abstract

Machine learning and quantum physics: Elucidating the behavior of quantum interacting systems of many particles remains one of the biggest challenges in physics. Traditional numerical methods often work well, but some of the most interesting problems leave them stumped. Carleo and Troyer harnessed the power of machine learning to develop a variational approach to the quantum many-body problem (see the Perspective by Hush). The method performed at least as well as state-of-the-art approaches, setting a benchmark for a prototypical two-dimensional problem. With further development, it may well prove a valuable piece in the quantum toolbox. Science , this issue p. 602 ; see also p. 580

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aag2302

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

2 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. J.Carrasquilla R. G.Melko https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.01735 (2016). · arXiv
  2. M. H.Amin E.Andriyash J.Rolfe B.Kulchytskyy R.Melko https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.02036 (2016). · arXiv
  3. Y. I. Frenkel Wave Mechanics: Advanced General Theory (International Series of Monographs on Nuclear Energy: Reactor Design Physics The Clarendon Press 1934).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Carleo, G., & Troyer, M.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Microsoft (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Carleo, Giuseppe
Venue
Science
Published
2017-02-10
Volume
355
Issue
6325
Pages
602-606
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2419175238
Cited by
2,215
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 178 · 2025: 297 · 2024: 257 · 2023: 250 · 2022: 289 · 2021: 303 · 2020: 255 · 2019: 208 · 2018: 132 · 2017: 46
FWCI
86.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (award287220)
  • Microsoft Research (award287221)
  • Lincoln Laboratory (award287222)
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (award287223)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
Keywords
quantum many-body problem, artificial neural networks, variational quantum states, reinforcement learning, ground state, unitary evolution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review