Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 500

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protective efficacy of multiple vaccine platforms against Zika virus challenge in rhesus monkeys

Open access
Abbink, Peter, Larocca, Rafael A., De La Barrera, Rafael A., Bricault, Christine A., Moseley, Edward T., Boyd, Michael, Kirilova, Marinela, Li, Zhenfeng, Ng’ang’a, David, Nanayakkara, Ovini, Nityanandam, Ramya, Mercado, Noe B., Borducchi, Erica N., Agarwal, Arshi, Brinkman, Amanda L., Cabral, Crystal, Chandrashekar, Abishek, Giglio, Patricia B., Jetton, David, Jimenez, Jessica, Lee, Benjamin C., Mojta, Shanell, Molloy, Katherine, Shetty, Mayuri, Neubauer, George H., Stephenson, Kathryn E., Peron, Jean Pierre S., Zanotto, Paolo M. de A., Misamore, Johnathan, Finneyfrock, Brad, Lewis, Mark G., Alter, Galit, Modjarrad, Kayvon, Jarman, Richard G., Eckels, Kenneth H., Michael, Nelson L., Thomas, Stephen J., Barouch, Dan H.·2016·Science

Abstract

Zika virus (ZIKV) is responsible for a major ongoing epidemic in the Americas and has been causally associated with fetal microcephaly. The development of a safe and effective ZIKV vaccine is therefore an urgent global health priority. Here we demonstrate that three different vaccine platforms protect against ZIKV challenge in rhesus monkeys. A purified inactivated virus vaccine induced ZIKV-specific neutralizing antibodies and completely protected monkeys against ZIKV strains from both Brazil and Puerto Rico. Purified immunoglobulin from vaccinated monkeys also conferred passive protection in adoptive transfer studies. A plasmid DNA vaccine and a single-shot recombinant rhesus adenovirus serotype 52 vector vaccine, both expressing ZIKV premembrane and envelope, also elicited neutralizing antibodies and completely protected monkeys against ZIKV challenge. These data support the rapid clinical development of ZIKV vaccines for humans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aah6157

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 500

Metadata

Authors
Abbink, P., Larocca, R. A., De La Barrera, R. A., Bricault, C. A., Moseley, E. T., Boyd, M., Kirilova, M., Li, Z., Ng’ang’a, D., Nanayakkara, O., Nityanandam, R., Mercado, N. B., Borducchi, E. N., Agarwal, A., Brinkman, A. L., Cabral, C., Chandrashekar, A., Giglio, P. B., Jetton, D., Jimenez, J., Lee, B. C., Mojta, S., Molloy, K., Shetty, M., Neubauer, G. H., Stephenson, K. E., Peron, J. P. S., Zanotto, P. M. D. A., Misamore, J., Finneyfrock, B., Lewis, M. G., Alter, G., Modjarrad, K., Jarman, R. G., Eckels, K. H., Michael, N. L., Thomas, S. J., & Barouch, D. H.
Venue
Science
Published
2016-09-09
Volume
353
Issue
6304
Pages
1129-1132
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2503597067
Cited by
500
References
7
FWCI
91.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protective efficacy of multiple vaccine platforms against Zika virus challenge in rhesus monkeys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1126/science.aah6157
The paper
Abbink, P., Larocca, R. A., De La Barrera, R. A., Bricault, C. A., Moseley, E. T., Boyd, M., Kirilova, M., Li, Z., Ng’ang’a, D., Nanayakkara, O., Nityanandam, R., Mercado, N. B., Borducchi, E. N., Agarwal, A., Brinkman, A. L., Cabral, C., Chandrashekar, A., Giglio, P. B., Jetton, D., . . . Barouch, D. H. (2016). Protective efficacy of multiple vaccine platforms against Zika virus challenge in rhesus monkeys. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah6157

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.