A high-coverage Neandertal genome from Vindija Cave in Croatia
Open accessAbstract
Revelations from a Vindija Neandertal genome: Neandertals clearly interbred with the ancestors of non-African modern humans, but many questions remain about our closest ancient relatives. Prüfer et al. present a 30-fold-coverage genome sequence from 50,000- to 65,000-year-old samples from a Neandertal woman found in Vindija, Croatia, and compared this sequence with genomes obtained from the Altai Neandertal, the Denisovans, and ancient and modern humans (see the Perspective by Bergström and Tyler-Smith). Neandertals likely lived in small groups and had lower genetic diversity than modern humans. The findings increase the number of Neandertal variants identified within populations of modern humans, and they suggest that a larger number of phenotypic and diseaserelated variants with Neandertal ancestry remain in the modern Eurasian gene pool than previously thought. Science , this issue p. 655 ; see also p. 586
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neanderthals had a relatively small effective population size of 2,000-3,000 individuals.
“We find that Neanderthals had a relatively small N e of 2,000-3,000 individuals, in agreement with previous pairwise sequential Markov chain analyses of Neanderthal genomes 1 .”
From The nature of Neanderthal introgression revealed by 27,566 Icelandic genomes (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
The Main Text (page not provided) says low heterozygosity suggests small, isolated populations with an effective population size of around 3,000. It does not give a 2,000–3,000 range, and it presents the estimate as an inference rather than an established fact. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe introgressing Neanderthal population diverged from the Altai Neanderthal population more than 100 kya, while the Vindija was much closer genetically and geographically.
“The introgressing Neanderthal population diverged from the Altai Neanderthal population more than 100 kya, while the Vindija was much closer genetically and geographically1,53.”
From Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
The Main Text estimates the Vindija–Altai population split at 130–145 kya and reports that Neanderthal DNA in present-day people is much closer to Vindija than to Altai. These findings support the genetic comparison and are consistent with a split from the Altai lineage more than 100 kya. The passages do not establish where the introgressing population lived, so they do not support the claim that Vindija was geographically closer to it. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMost humans outside of Africa trace about 2% of their genomes to admixture from Neanderthals, which occurred 50-60 thousand years ago.
“Most humans outside of Africa trace about 2% of their genomes to admixture from Neanderthals, which occurred 50-60 thousand years ago 1 .”
From The nature of Neanderthal introgression revealed by 27,566 Icelandic genomes (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
The Main Text reports that people with roots outside Africa have Neandertal ancestry and estimates 1.8–2.6% Neandertal DNA in non-African populations outside Oceania, supporting the claim's approximate 2%. It says Neandertals mixed with the ancestors of people outside sub-Saharan Africa, but the passages found do not date that admixture to 50–60 thousand years ago; the paper's 80–100-thousand-year figure concerns a split between Neandertal populations, not the admixture event. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe introgressing Neanderthals were probably from populations separated in time and space from the three high-coverage archaic individuals (DAV).
“Moreover, the introgressing Neanderthals were probably from populations that were separated both in time and space from the three archaic individuals who have so far been sequenced to high coverage-hereafter referred to as DAV (Denisovan, Altai Neanderthal and Vindija Neanderthal) 1,17,18 .”
From The nature of Neanderthal introgression revealed by 27,566 Icelandic genomes (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
The Main Text (page unavailable) says most Neanderthal DNA in present-day people came from populations that diverged from the Vindija and Mezmaiskaya lineages before those lineages separated about 80–100 thousand years ago; it also reports distinct ages for the three high-coverage archaic individuals. This supports a temporal and population-lineage distinction, but the passages do not establish that the introgressing populations were geographically separated from all three individuals. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAnalyses of available genome-wide association studies and large-scale biobank data revealed that alleles of Neanderthal ancestry are associated with diverse traits in modern Eurasians.
“Analyses of available genome-wide association studies and large-scale biobank data revealed that alleles of Neanderthal ancestry are associated with diverse traits in modern Eurasians1,3–5.”
From Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
The Main Text (page unavailable) reports Neandertal-derived variants associated with diverse traits and disease risks in present-day non-Africans, which includes modern Eurasians. The References cite a GWAS catalogue, but the passages do not establish that this paper used large-scale biobank data to reach those findings. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Nearly all Eurasians have ~2% Neanderthal ancestry resulting from interbreeding events that occurred shortly after their ancestors left Africa.
“nearly all Eurasians have ~2% Neanderthal ancestry resulting from interbreeding events that occurred shortly after their ancestors left Africa1,2.”
From Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
The Main Text says that Neandertals mixed with ancestors of present-day people outside Africa and estimates 1.8–2.6% Neandertal DNA in non-African populations outside Oceania, supporting the approximately 2% figure for Eurasians. It does not say that the interbreeding occurred shortly after their ancestors left Africa; the timing stated in the claim is therefore unsupported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe Altai-matching set contains alleles that originated in the Neanderthal lineage and were likely common among diverse Neanderthal groups given the substantial genetic, geographical, and temporal divergence of the Altai Neanderthal from the introgressing population.
“The Altai-matching set contains alleles that originated in the Neanderthal lineage and were likely common among diverse Neanderthal groups given the substantial genetic, geographical, and temporal divergence of the Altai Neanderthal from the introgressing population1,53.”
From Quantifying the contribution of Neanderthal introgression to the heritability of complex traits (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredNeanderthal ancestry is relatively uniform among modern Eurasian populations but is approximately 8 to 24% higher in East Asia than in Europe.
“While NE ancestry is relatively uniform among modern Eurasian populations (1, 2), it is approximately 8 to 24% higher in East Asia than in Europe (5, 10, 12, 13).”
From Past human expansions shaped the spatial pattern of Neanderthal ancestry (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
The Main Text (page not provided) reports that East Asians carry somewhat more Neandertal DNA (2.3–2.6%) than people in Western Eurasia (1.8–2.4%). It does not give the cited 8–24% relative difference, so the direction of the comparison is supported but its precise magnitude is not established by this passage. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredEvidence in favor of hybridization between Neanderthals and modern humans has accumulated during the past decade.
“Evidence in favor of hybridization has accumulated during the past decade (4–6).”
From Past human expansions shaped the spatial pattern of Neanderthal ancestry (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Eurasians are estimated to trace around 2% of their genomes to introgression from archaic humans related to the Vindija Neanderthal.
“Eurasians are estimated to trace around 2% of their genomes to introgression from archaic humans 2 related to the Vindija Neanderthal 1 .”
From The nature of Neanderthal introgression revealed by 27,566 Icelandic genomes (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
Both our results and previous studies indicate that the introgressing Neanderthal was closer to the Vindija Neanderthal than the Altai Neanderthal or Denisovan.
“Both our results and previous studies 1 indicate that the introgressing Neanderthal was closer to the Vindija Neanderthal than the Altai Neanderthal or Denisovan.”
From The nature of Neanderthal introgression revealed by 27,566 Icelandic genomes (2020) · cites this paper as [1]
Much of the current genetic variation within humans predates the split, estimated at 520 to 630 thousand years ago, between the populations that would become modern humans and Neanderthals.
“Much of the current genetic variation within humans predates the split, estimated at 520 to 630 thousand years (ka) ago (1), between the populations that would become modern humans and Neanderthals.”
From An ancestral recombination graph of human, Neanderthal, and Denisovan genomes (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
The mean TMRCA to Neanderthal across all Neanderthal haplotype blocks in non-African populations is about 74 ka ago, using published corrections for branch shortening in the archaic genomes.
“We detect a mean TMRCA to Neanderthal of about 74 ka ago across all Neanderthal haplotype blocks in non-African populations, using published corrections for branch shortening in the archaic genomes (1).”
From An ancestral recombination graph of human, Neanderthal, and Denisovan genomes (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
This second range expansion is essential for explaining the pattern currently observed of lower Neanderthal ancestry in western Europe than in East Asia.
“This second range expansion is essential for explaining the pattern currently observed of lower NE ancestry in western Europe than in East Asia (5, 10, 12, 13).”
From Past human expansions shaped the spatial pattern of Neanderthal ancestry (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
Some loci introgressed from archaic hominins in present-day populations appear to influence disease risk, such as neurological, psychiatric, immunological, dermatological, and dietary disorders, either positively or negatively.
“in present-day populations, some loci introgressed from archaic hominins appear to influence disease risk, such as neurological, psychiatric, immunological, dermatological, and dietary disorders (5, 58), either positively or negatively.”
From Past human expansions shaped the spatial pattern of Neanderthal ancestry (2023) · cites this paper as [5]
After modern humans left Africa more than 60,000 years ago, multiple admixture events around 55,000 years ago occurred between modern humans and now extinct archaic humans including Neandertals and Denisovans.
“After modern humans left Africa more than 60,000 years ago, genetic evidence suggests multiple admixture events ~55,000 years [9] between modern humans and now extinct archaic humans including Neandertals [10–12] and Denisovans [13, 14].”
From Neandertal introgression partitions the genetic landscape of neuropsychiatric disorders and associated behavioral phenotypes (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
The mutation rate used in demographic simulations is different from that in the original description of the demographic model but concordant with more recent studies that measured divergence between modern and archaic hominins.
“This mutation rate is different from that in the original description of the demographic model but concordant with more recent studies that measured divergence between modern and archaic hominins (1).”
From An ancestral recombination graph of human, Neanderthal, and Denisovan genomes (2021) · cites this paper as [1]
The Main Text reports modern human–Neandertal split-time estimates and notes uncertainty in mutation rates, but it does not compare a mutation rate used in demographic simulations with the rate in an original model or with rates from more recent divergence studies. Searches for those comparisons found no passage addressing them; the relevant passages have no page number in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 113 · Cited by 719
- Authors
- Prüfer, K., de Filippo, C., Grote, S., Mafessoni, F., Korlević, P., Hajdinjak, M., Vernot, B., Skov, L., Hsieh, P., Peyrégne, S., Reher, D., Hopfe, C., Nagel, S., Maricic, T., Fu, Q., Theunert, C., Rogers, R., Skoglund, P., Chintalapati, M., Dannemann, M., Nelson, B. J., Key, F. M., Rudan, P., Kućan, Ž., Gušić, I., Golovanova, L. V., Doronichev, V. B., Patterson, N., Reich, D., Eichler, E. E., Slatkin, M., Schierup, M. H., Andrés, A. M., Kelso, J., Meyer, M., & Pääbo, S.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
- Aarhus University (DK)
- University of Washington (US)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Broad Institute (US)
- Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts (HR)
- ANO Laboratory of Prehistory 14 Linia 3-11, St. Petersburg 1990 34, Russia.
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Prüfer, Kay
- Grote, Steffi
- Mafessoni, Fabrizio
- Pääbo, Svante
- ORCID
- Prüfer, Kay
- Mafessoni, Fabrizio
- Korlević, Petra
- Hajdinjak, Mateja
- Vernot, Benjamin
- Skov, Laurits
- Hsieh, Pinghsun
- Peyrégne, Stéphane
- Reher, David
- Hopfe, Charlotte
- Fu, Qiaomei
- Rogers, Rebekah
- Skoglund, Pontus
- Chintalapati, Manjusha
- Dannemann, Michael
- Nelson, Bradley J.
- Key, Felix M.
- Golovanova, Liubov V.
- Doronichev, Vladimir B.
- Patterson, Nick
- Reich, David
- Eichler, Evan E.
- Slatkin, Montgomery
- Schierup, Mikkel H.
- Andrés, Aida M.
- Kelso, Janet
- Meyer, Matthias
- Pääbo, Svante
- Venue
- Science
- Published
- 2017-11-03
- Volume
- 358
- Issue
- 6363
- Pages
- 655-658
- ISSN
- 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-9203
- PMC
- PMC6185897
- OpenAlex
- W2762876887
- Semantic Scholar
- 987553bf20e69819b8e0f7b09bc092f91dce57f9
- Cited by
- 719
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 75 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 5
- FWCI
- 236.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- europepmc.org
- Locations
- Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste (University of Trieste https://www.units.it/) (submittedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (award335691, BCS-1032255)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (award350447, 55008731)
- European Research Council (award335689, 694707)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (award350444, 91731303, award350445, 41672021, award350446, 41630102)
- NIH (award348289, R01-GM40282)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (award350440, XDB13000000, award350441, QYZDB-SS, award350442, W-DQC003, award350443, XDPB05)
- National key R&D program of China (award350439, 2016YFE0203700)
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft (award335688, 31-12LMP)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- LDL cholesterol, schizophrenia, ancient DNA, high-coverage sequencing
- MeSH terms
- DNA, Ancient, Alleles, Animals, Biological Evolution, Humans, Genome, Croatia, Neanderthals, Caves
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review