Cited by 749

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A topological quantum optics interface

Barik, Sabyasachi, Karasahin, Aziz, Flower, Christopher, Cai, Tao, Miyake, Hirokazu, DeGottardi, Wade, Hafezi, Mohammad, Waks, Edo·2018·Science

Abstract

Connecting quantum emitters: Exploiting topological properties of a system allows certain properties to be protected against the disorder and scattering caused by defects. Barik et al. demonstrate a strong light-matter interaction in a topological photonic structure (see the Perspective by Amo). They created topological edge states at the interface between two photonic, topologically distinct regions and coupled them to a single quantum emitter. The chiral nature of single-photon emission was used to inject single photons of opposite polarization into counterpropagating topological edge states. Such a topological quantum optics interface may provide a powerful platform for developing robust integrated quantum optical circuits. Science , this issue p. 666 ; see also p. 638

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aaq0327

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experiments of Barik et al. (2018) showed that the two pseudospins characterizing each interface state band correspond to opposite circular polarizations of the confined photons.

    “The experiments of Barik et al. (2018) showed that the two pseudospins characterizing each interface state band correspond to opposite circular polarizations of the confined photons.”

    From Topological photonics (2019) · cites this paper as Barik et al. (2018)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.83.1523 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.011004 · DOI
  3. 10.1063/PT.3.2394 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.248 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nphys2835 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nphys3185 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.aab0239 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nmat4573 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.274 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1038/nphys2063 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.195317 · DOI
  12. G. Harari M. A. Bandres Y. Lumer Y. Plotnik D. N. Christodoulides M. Segev “Topological lasers ” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics [OSA Technical Digest (online) Optical Society of America 2016] FM3A.3. · DOI
  13. 10.1038/s41566-017-0006-2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1038/nature21037 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/RevModPhys.85.299 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1038/nphoton.2016.259 · DOI
  17. D. G. Angelakis Ed. Quantum Simulations with Photons and Polaritons (Springer International Publishing 2017). · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.223901 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1088/1367-2630/18/11/113013 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.195315 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1257671 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1038/s41598-017-16334-0 · DOI
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.042116 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/113030 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevX.5.021025 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.206809 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1088/1367-2630/15/6/063001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Barik, S., Karasahin, A., Flower, C., Cai, T., Miyake, H., DeGottardi, W., Hafezi, M., & Waks, E.
Affiliations
  • Department of Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and Institute for Research in Electronics and Applied Physics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
  • Joint Quantum Institute, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Venue
Science
Published
2018-02-09
Volume
359
Issue
6376
Pages
666-668
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
749
References
3
Language
en
Funders
  • Office of Naval Research (N000141512727)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA95501610323)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (FG201565959)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review