Cited by 807Orbital Angular Momentum in OpticsMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsPlasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research

Chiral nanophotonic waveguide interface based on spin-orbit interaction of light

Open access
Petersen, Jan, Volz, Jürgen, Rauschenbeutel, Arno·2014·Science

Abstract

Controlling the flow of light with nanoparticles: Light propagating through optic fibers could provide the ultimate in information flow, but controlling the direction of flow is a key requirement. Petersen et al. show that the directional flow of light in a fiber can be controlled by placing a single gold nanoparticle on or near the surface of the fiber. By exploiting the chiral properties of light (the spin-orbit interaction), the authors demonstrate that the “handedness” or polarization state of the light hitting the particle determines in which direction the light flows in the fiber. Science , this issue p. 67

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1257671

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Berry connection and Berry curvature immediately appear in all intrinsic SOI phenomena, such as the spin-Hall effect.

    “Therefore, the Berry connection and Berry curvature immediately appear in all intrinsic SOI phenomena, such as the spin-Hall effect.”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [60]

    The introduction (p. 1) identifies the spin-Hall effect as a phenomenon associated with spin-orbit coupling. But the passages in our copy do not discuss Berry connection or Berry curvature, so they do not support the claim that these appear in all intrinsic spin-orbit-interaction phenomena. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Two fundamental concepts underpin the SOI of light: optical angular momentum and geometric (Berry) phases for light.

    “Two important fundamental concepts underpin the SOI of light: optical angular momentum 57- 59 and geometric (Berry) phases for light 60- 62 .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [60]

    The introduction (p. 1) says that spin and orbital angular momentum of guided light become coupled, supporting the optical-angular-momentum part of the claim. Our copy does not describe geometric (Berry) phases as a concept underpinning spin–orbit interaction; a geometric phase appears only in a cited reference title (p. 5). (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Geometric phases in optics originate from the coupling between intrinsic angular momentum and rotations of coordinates.

    “Geometric phases in optics originate from the coupling between intrinsic angular momentum and rotations of coordinates .”

    From Spin–orbit interactions of light (2015) · cites this paper as [60]

    The discussion on p. 1 describes coupling between photon spin and orbital angular momentum in confined waveguides, but does not explain the origin of geometric phases. A reference title on p. 5 mentions a geometric phase; searches for geometric phases and coordinate rotations found no passage in this paper making the claimed connection. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [17]Scully, M. O. & Zubairy, M. Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
  2. [20]Bohren, C. F. & Huffman, D. R. Absorption and scattering of light by small particles (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petersen, J., Volz, J., & Rauschenbeutel, A.
Affiliations
TU Wien (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Volz, Jürgen
  • Rauschenbeutel, Arno
Venue
Science
Published
2014-10-03
Volume
346
Issue
6205
Pages
67-71
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2050828289
Cited by
807
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 78 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 77 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 1
FWCI
31.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials › Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Keywords
spin-orbit interaction of light, nanophotonic waveguides, gold nanoparticles, mirror symmetry breaking, orbital angular momentum, spin angular momentum, optical sensors, integrated photonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review