Cited by 75Agricultural and Food SciencesForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementForest Management and Policy

Are wood pellets a green fuel?

Schlesinger, William H.·2018·Science

Abstract

A return to firewood is bad for forests and for the climate

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aat2305

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schlesinger, W. H.
Affiliations
Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies (US)
Corresponding author
Schlesinger, William H.
Venue
Science
Published
2018-03-23
Volume
359
Issue
6382
Pages
1328-1329
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2793700940
Cited by
75
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8
FWCI
21.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
wood pellets, bioenergy, firewood, forest degradation, climate change, CO2 emissions, renewable energy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review